❄️ Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku HG 400
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Ostatnio edytowane:
I really shouldn't be surprised, but I am floored with the degenerates that EFAP manages to get on. But then again, what could you expect with one of the co-hosts is Mister Metokur if he were a gay furry.
They really seem to be rotating lately through a list of skeptic/ibs style people who were popular 2 years ago. Aydin was on not that long ago, now Skeptic. EFAP is popular and makes a ton of money, why are they getting on people that are a few years past being relevant? They could invite practically anyone they want. The shows have thousands of live viewers. Is this supposed to be some type of pr because of the breakup?
 
They really seem to be rotating lately through a list of skeptic/ibs style people who were popular 2 years ago. Aydin was on not that long ago, now Skeptic. EFAP is popular and makes a ton of money, why are they getting on people that are a few years past being relevant? They could invite practically anyone they want. The shows have thousands of live viewers. Is this supposed to be some type of pr because of the breakup?
They even got the Don himself a while ago.
 
They really seem to be rotating lately through a list of skeptic/ibs style people who were popular 2 years ago. Aydin was on not that long ago, now Skeptic. EFAP is popular and makes a ton of money, why are they getting on people that are a few years past being relevant? They could invite practically anyone they want. The shows have thousands of live viewers. Is this supposed to be some type of pr because of the breakup?

That's probably the case. Aydin appeared because MauLer wanted female co-hosts in covering a Jenny Nicholson video so he wouldn't be accused of sexism. Greg needs a place to improve his image and EFAP is quite the echo chamber.

Incidentally, Greg was one of the channels MauLer made fun of for liking TFA. But then Greg said bad stuff about TLJ and the people who liked it, so now MauLer's cool with him.
 
I miss the days when MauLer just made autistic videos about stuff he didn't like, instead of boring livestreams of circle-jerking.

Unfortunately, the latter is a lot less stress-inducing to make. Considering how Greg's video output has been lacking this year, even before the split, I can see him following MauLer's example of hosting streams and his fans still pay him the same amount of money he would be making with scripted content.
 
Unfortunately, the latter is a lot less stress-inducing to make. Considering how Greg's video output has been lacking this year, even before the split, I can see him following MauLer's example of hosting streams and his fans still pay him the same amount of money he would be making with scripted content.
His takes on stream are slightly worse than the takes in his videos, whether it be through lack of information or being unfiltered, his livestreams are objectively worse than his videos.
It'd be funny to hear about the breakup on stream, but I doubt any of them will bring it up because they;re all wimps
 
1593910387887.png

[SPOILER="Vaush, Bernie, AOC, and leftist cringe,

Liking that post may be the worst thing Shoe has ever done every word of that gives me pain to read
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
His takes on stream are slightly worse than the takes in his videos, whether it be through lack of information or being unfiltered, his livestreams are objectively worse than his videos.
It'd be funny to hear about the breakup on stream, but I doubt any of them will bring it up because they;re all wimps

They can't offend their big guest star, even if when he becomes irrelevant later this year.
 
Unfortunately, the latter is a lot less stress-inducing to make. Considering how Greg's video output has been lacking this year, even before the split, I can see him following MauLer's example of hosting streams and his fans still pay him the same amount of money he would be making with scripted content.

The era of the scripted and edited video is dead. Streaming is ultimately just an easier and better option. Especially since the adpocalypse hit. Instead of raking in revenue through ads, you have to get it thought donations from fans.

I wouldn't be shocked if in the coming years all content creators focus solely on streaming, with other video types becoming a much rarer breed.
 
The era of the scripted and edited video is dead. Streaming is ultimately just an easier and better option. Especially since the adpocalypse hit. Instead of raking in revenue through ads, you have to get it thought donations from fans.

I wouldn't be shocked if in the coming years all content creators focus solely on streaming, with other video types becoming a much rarer breed.

You would think that negatively affects political commentary channels like Greg and June where getting the facts right is crucial.

But fans never watch political commentary for the facts. They just want their beliefs reinforced.
 
It's like June's parents seriously need to have a long, heart-felt conversation with June. Of course, they should come at her with empathy, but they also need to realistically help June define her options in life. I'm not a parent, so I cannot say I know the best thing to do in this situation, but a long conversation seems like something sorely needed, at least from the perspective of a random anon.
Well June kind of had a path (getting married). But that fell through. Given that June was living at home, her parents (mother & father) should have done of better of sniffing out the situation.

In a long distance relationship with a divorced man, who loves to sleep with other women (but June can't sleep with other men). They play mock a BDSM relationship. He did propose. But it had been two years and no one was planning the wedding. This was a shit or get off the pot scenario.

yawn it's the same statement as before.
Wyświetl załącznik 1419747
"No we are not poly."
She just happened to make a video about him being able to fuck other women, and she can't. OK. Fine. Technically not poly. More of a one-way open relationship for him.
Also, Bill Clinton did not have sex with that intern. It depends on what the definition of "is" is.
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
But fans never watch political commentary for the facts. They just want their beliefs reinforced.
Honestly, seeing someone else parrot what you're thinking is important, even as seeing people challenge your thinking is.

The entire point of tech censorship is to make people who think normal things, things like "uhhh. riots are bad and dangerous tho. also, how come that's ok but I can't go to the beach with my kid?" feel like they're completely alone and everyone else has taken crazy pills, so they better toe the line.

But I still look down on anyone who turns to one of these two for political commentary.

Even if you're looking for leftycuck content, there has to be someone better than this.
 
Honestly, seeing someone else parrot what you're thinking is important, even as seeing people challenge your thinking is.

The entire point of tech censorship is to make people who think normal things, things like "uhhh. riots are bad and dangerous tho. also, how come that's ok but I can't go to the beach with my kid?" feel like they're completely alone and everyone else has taken crazy pills, so they better toe the line.

But I still look down on anyone who turns to one of these two for political commentary.

Even if you're looking for leftycuck content, there has to be someone better than this.

I'd like to think it'll still be important for creators to script and edit their content in the future, especially political commentary. Parroted or not, it needs to be correct or you end up with false accusations being spread.
 
I always had the impression both were on the left, but just didn't like SJW's ruining their entertainment. Never got the impression they were on the right at all. They were following Youtube trends - atheism, gamergate, anti-sjw, etc. Their positions were on the left, they just made anti Anita or anti Laci videos before they became friends. No one talks about their videos anymore except their most loyal fans, so why not go full leftist? That's what's rising on Youtube, if for no other reason than they are not getting banned.
Exactly both were proto-dirtbag left. Honestly if June decided to wait a year or two later to make her anti-sjw videos she would have been fucking one of the guys on ChapoTrapHouse instead of Greg.

All skeptics were just proto-dirtbag leftists. But because they were too early for the wave they leaned hard on the conservative YouTube fanbase and some embraced it entirely. But most got fucked hard for it. All the skeptics are all done and gone while the dirtbag leftists who emerged literally only 18 months later are still going strong, only losing 1% of subs monthly instead of the full death skeptics have.

Honestly though sweet June would have been better off missing the GG movement and waiting that extra year or two, sure someone else could have been the hot GG chick. But her being the hot bernie gal would have beeb better for her career wise and mentally. She wouldnt have been forced to live in buffalo for a shitty boyfriend and she would have gotten a lot more people in her friend group closer to her age and be better at dealing with her clingyness and weird personality. She could have been the queen of brooklyn instead of being the sugar momma for some fat 40 hear old
 

She's back guys. And you definitely want to archive this video. This is going to age terribly.

"We don't even use tear gas in war. But we will use it on our own citizens. And by the way, the cops can throw it at you, but if you pick it up and throw it back at them, that's assault with a deadly weapon."

And she gives that look at the camera like "do I really have to explain it?"

Yes, June, you have to explain why you don't understand that the police have a monopoly on violence. Guess what? If I draw my gun and shoot a cop, that's also assault with a deadly weapon. But the cop can shoot me. That's how our society works. Citizens are not equals with the police, and guess what, we aren't held to the same rigorous standards either. So the cops get some freedom to use violence, but they also have a responsibility to stop others from messing with their rights.

Then later on she puts up a tweet commenting about how no one who is peaceful is stopping the rioters. No real comments there, but it flies in the face of her own point. If the protestors aren't going to stop looters and rioters, why should they be allowed to use violence against the cops? Self-defense? You don't have the right to defend yourself against a police officer, it's actually a crime in and of itself called "resisting arrest".

If we could get this through these idiots' heads, maybe there would be fewer police shootings? Do not resist arrest.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=m9ThyFE0V1Q
She's back guys. And you definitely want to archive this video. This is going to age terribly.

"We don't even use tear gas in war. But we will use it on our own citizens. And by the way, the cops can throw it at you, but if you pick it up and throw it back at them, that's assault with a deadly weapon."

And she gives that look at the camera like "do I really have to explain it?"

Yes, June, you have to explain why you don't understand that the police have a monopoly on violence. Guess what? If I draw my gun and shoot a cop, that's also assault with a deadly weapon. But the cop can shoot me. That's how our society works. Citizens are not equals with the police, and guess what, we aren't held to the same rigorous standards either. So the cops get some freedom to use violence, but they also have a responsibility to stop others from messing with their rights.

Then later on she puts up a tweet commenting about how no one who is peaceful is stopping the rioters. No real comments there, but it flies in the face of her own point. If the protestors aren't going to stop looters and rioters, why should they be allowed to use violence against the cops? Self-defense? You don't have the right to defend yourself against a police officer, it's actually a crime in and of itself called "resisting arrest".

If we could get this through these idiots' heads, maybe there would be fewer police shootings? Do not resist arrest.
You're implying it's not shit already? I already ranted about how bad this video was.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole