Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[pierce your heart]

You called me a racist, that's an attack.
racist + nazi are your favorite attacks to silence white people.
So i asked you, what do you mean by racist?
you're calling me a racist to deny me a white community, roundabout way of enacting open borders, + prevent any accountability for other groups.
yes or no?
we're not changing the subject until you're held accountable for marginalizing the white community through his racist hate label slur.
Cuz that's what racism is, slur against white people to delegitimize our group interest.
Break us down into individuals so you can destroy us by making us a minority and creating an unconscious bias that you must race mix or you're a racist.
that's the goal of anti racism, white genocide.

As long as you remember your place not many people here care about the future of inferior races like wh*tes

 

[BoxerShorts47]

As long as you remember your place not many people here care about the future of inferior races like wh*tes

yes or no.
do you support the right of whites to exist? to have self determination? to have communities without diversity and leadership that represents us?
do you support the right of whites to judge others by the content of their character? to stand with science? to protect ourselves from disproportionate crime through racial profiling?
yes or no.
are you an ally of the white community or an enemy.
silence is violence. remember that.
you're either with us or against us.

 

[pierce your heart]

yes or no.
do you support the right of whites to exist? to have self determination? to have communities without diversity and leadership that represents us?
do you support the right of whites to judge others by the content of their character? to stand with science? to protect ourselves from disproportionate crime through racial profiling?
yes or no.
are you an ally of the white community or an enemy.
silence is violence. remember that.
you're either with us or against us.

I understand you are not part of the master race but even so your reading comprehension is abysmal

 

[BoxerShorts47]

BoxerShorts47 is basically halal at this point. 34 pages of this shit.

we're going 1k+ posts at this rate.
until i run out of low iq spergs to debate.
i was hoping for a challenge but I've already heard all these talking points from sjws on twitter or libertarians on gab.
so I'm not even breaking a sweat debunking all these stupid talking points.
and everyone has to evade my points with strawman or moat and bailey fallacies.

 

[Niggaplease]

absolutely retarded.
look you've given up
you've accepted the liberal agenda
do i have a right to no diversity?
do i have a right to judge blacks by the content of their character?
you're saying no, because the liberals will attack you as "racist."
so you're not willing to fight against them.
you've accepted that liberals will be in control and they will tell you what is socially accountable or not.
you are cucking for liberals.
that's why you're a cuckservative.
if you're defending liberals than you're a liberal.

well then quit being a pussy and do it faggot. no one here is taking you seriously and truthfully if your Latino you have no dog in this fight anyway. you're just wanting to brawl on the streets.

 

[JuanLee]

you're either with us or against us.

Just because you say something doesn't make it true. Like this. What about indifference? I mean, you see either/or, which, aside from all the other indicators , marks you down as a bit basic.

 

[Fareal]

I got a dozen pages into this and all I took away is some beaner called Garcia thinks he can become white. He’s some kind of.... transracialist?

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Just because you say something doesn't make it true. Like this. What about indifference? I mean, you see either/or, which, aside from all the other indicators , marks you down as a bit basic.

no such thing as indifference or shades of grey or neutrality.
let me give you an example.
let's say your being attacked. you got jumped on the streets
and there is a male next to you, stranger,
and he stands by and watches, he is neutral.
would your brain say that is okay?
rephrase, if you met this person in the future and they asked you for a favor, would you do it?
probably not.
problem here is the brain will reinterpret neutrality as "well he/she COULD have helped me but they didn't so they are my enemy."
brain is hardwired to resolve neutrality, resolve shades of grey. make a definitive yes/no, good/bad decision.
this is why the US declaring sanctions on Japan before WW2 was considered an act of war by the Japanese, not viewed as neutrality.
Likewise this explains why the liberals always preach equality but in practice enact inversion.
e.g. 1950s: sex before marriage was not okay.
liberals said don't judge. be neutral
BUT IN PRACTICE, an unconscious bias was created against people who we're whores,
"omg you're prude. have you finally done it? home base? etc."
they never got equality, never stay in shades of grey, final result was inversion,
we went from no sex before marriage = good to being a whore = good.

 

[Popper Whiting]

we're going 1k+ posts at this rate.
until i run out of low iq spergs to debate.
i was hoping for a challenge but I've already heard all these talking points from sjws on twitter or libertarians on gab.
so I'm not even breaking a sweat debunking all these stupid talking points.
and everyone has to evade my points with strawman or moat and bailey fallacies.

I didn't realize you interpreted myself and others making fun of you as being evasive. Usually when someone is pilloried and made fun of they realize that it is down to the fact that most people on the website consider them to be massive flaming faggots. Yet you interpret being pilloried and being made fun of as us protecting Jews and coloreds. Why does is make more sense to you that the hostile reaction to you is entirely down to political reasons and not down to the fact that you may in fact be a complete and utter faggot?

 

[Buster O'Keefe]

You midwits

Found the Teddy Beale cock-sucker. I'll bet both these galaxy brains are getting most of their garbage 'ideas' from that fountainhead of autism.

https://kiwifarms.pl/threads/theodore-teddy-beale-vox-day-vox-popoli-teddy-spaghetti.14597/

 

[BoxerShorts47]

I didn't realize you interpreted myself and others making fun of you as being evasive. Usually when someone is pilloried and made fun of they realize that it is down to the fact that most people on the website consider them to be massive flaming faggots. Yet you interpret being pilloried and being made fun of as us protecting Jews and coloreds. Why does is make more sense to you that the hostile reaction to you is entirely down to political reasons and not down to the fact that you may in fact be a complete and utter faggot?

yes or no.
do you support the right of whites to exist? to have self determination? to have communities without diversity and leadership that represents us?
do you support the right of whites to judge others by the content of their character? to stand with science? to protect ourselves from disproportionate crime through racial profiling?
yes or no.
are you an ally of the white community or an enemy?
silence is violence. remember that.
you're either with us or against us! - George Bush.

 

[Begemot]

You called me a racist, that's an attack.
racist + nazi are your favorite attacks to silence white people.
So i asked you, what do you mean by racist?
you're calling me a racist to deny me a white community, roundabout way of enacting open borders, + prevent any accountability for other groups.
yes or no?
we're not changing the subject until you're held accountable for marginalizing the white community through his racist hate label slur.
Cuz that's what racism is, slur against white people to delegitimize our group interest.
Break us down into individuals so you can destroy us by making us a minority and creating an unconscious bias that you must race mix or you're a racist.
that's the goal of anti racism, white genocide.

Nah, son, we're not changing the subject until you bend the knee to inchoate chaos. Race is meaningless, but I guess you're easily baited, sweetie. The overmind is coming and you're not prepared. Call it what you want, Kali Yuga, I guess, you're just another beta whimpering in the darkness....

 

[Popper Whiting]

yes or no.
do you support the right of whites to exist? to have self determination? to have communities without diversity and leadership that represents us?
do you support the right of whites to judge others by the content of their character? to stand with science? to protect ourselves from disproportionate crime through racial profiling?
yes or no.
are you an ally of the white community or an enemy?
silence is violence. remember that.
you're either with us or against us! - George Bush.

No, no, no, no! You don't get to shoot me questions. You have to earn it.
Before I debate your points you must debate me and prove me wrong

 

[pierce your heart]

yes or no.
do you support the right of whites to exist? to have self determination? to have communities without diversity and leadership that represents us?
do you support the right of whites to judge others by the content of their character? to stand with science? to protect ourselves from disproportionate crime through racial profiling?
yes or no.
are you an ally of the white community or an enemy?
silence is violence. remember that.
you're either with us or against us! - George Bush.

no and no. What's you gonna do about it cry and sperg on my autism forum?

 

[BoxerShorts47]

No, no, no, no!
Before I debate your points you must debate me and prove me wrong
Wyświetl załącznik 1345549

okay so you're anti white and that makes you a racist. congrats you just destroyed yourself through your own anti-racism logic.
this is the same reason process the center-left liberals used to become sjws. except they said "are you an ally of the black community?"
not being an ally of community x = racism.
proof by contradiction. being anti racist leads to racism hence this racism concept is invalid.

 

[WeeGee]

Jesus fucking Christ, does this mofo sleep at all?

 

[I Love Beef]

Jesus fucking Christ, does this mofo sleep at all?

I bet 500 bucks he's a methhead

 

[Popper Whiting]

okay so you're anti white and that makes you a racist. congrats you just destroyed yourself through your own anti-racism logic.
this is the same reason process the center-left liberals used to become sjws. except they said "are you an ally of the black community?"
not being an ally of community x = racism.
proof by contradiction. being anti racist leads to racism hence this racism concept is invalid.

You see this is exactly what a complete and utter faggot would say. He'd deflect into a strawman argument regarding race and not address the issue that is at the core of the debate. That issue being "I think you're a faggot". Your lack of denial regarding the faggot question is telling...............and not changing my mind.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

okay so you're anti white and that makes you a racist. congrats you just destroyed yourself through your own anti-racism logic.
this is the same reason process the center-left liberals used to become sjws. except they said "are you an ally of the black community?"
not being an ally of community x = racism.
proof by contradiction. being anti racist leads to racism hence this racism concept is invalid.

proof against racism
racism = bad // axiom
differences between people (DNA, racial profiling) = racism // axiom
anti racism = color blind, treating everyone equal, love not hate // axiom
being anti racism = good // conclusion

colorblind/equal opportunity (anti-racism) leads to:
1. not seeing "racism," unequal outcomes, 1.5 including micro-aggression "where are you from?"
2. doesn't account for "historical injustices,"
3. doesn't value diversity / multiculturalism, the ways people are different (unequal).
etc...

actual conclusion
equality and colorblind lead to NOT caring about these other groups and the ways they are struggling and the differences between our lives and their lives.
if we don't listen to other communities and resolve these inequality than we're actually racist.
So we cannot treat everyone the same, we must treat people differently depending their community, their class, and worship those differences.
end result = bs like white privilege and systematic racism to explain unequal outcomes.
anti racism leads to racism = contradiction, which means racism concept is invalid.
reason the reason racism is invalid concept is because the axiom are invalid.

but i assume you people are low iq aka retards and don't understand a simple proof by contradiction.

 

[Trigger Me Timbers]

Hopefully I can get it done by the end of year, 6 months
10 year goal is to make white nationalism as mainstream as social justice today.
I want to go public preferably ASAP but definitely within 2 years.
Do college campus tours and keynote addresses like Milo or Spencer or Kirk.

From this thread we have learned:

• you don’t have a house (live with your parents)
• you have no savings
• you can’t keep your own room tidy
• you don’t know who your father is or have an absentee father in your life
• been on /pol/ since 2018
• can’t spell for shit
• No GF, possible virgin from that fact you wear a beanie

AsaBro, I don’t think you could even complete a 30 minute online course in 10 years let alone make a universally hated movement “more popular than social justice”

can I get an invite to your discord?