- Dołączono
- 12 Sty 2019
I agree 100%. Writers should remove darkies from all media right now. They can write their own stories (that nobody will watch).
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
I agree 100%. Writers should remove darkies from all media right now. They can write their own stories (that nobody will watch).
It's not worth writing minorities in your works any more. You'll get less shit from the SJW crowd if you just make everything white than if you add a minority.I agree 100%. Writers should remove darkies from all media right now. They can write their own stories (that nobody will watch).
White privilege:
Apparently there are no minorities on television, no black people in history, and "curricular material prove that white people exist" (?).
Middle-to-upper-class: Have you ever heard of Medicaid? Assuming that all poor people have never been to a doctor and have terrible teeth is incredibly classiest. Its like saying "not being covered in dung 24/7" is rich privilege in the assumption everyone below the middle class is a dung-covered peasant. Poor people absolutely have access to check ups, dental cleanings, and basic eyecare. 3 is incredibly weird "If you are rich person wearing hand me downs, everyone thinks you're doing it by choice!" is...entirely true. If you can afford more expensive clothing but are wearing second hand clothing it is by choice. I'm betting whoever wrote this was a rich white dude.
Male:
1. Is...not an advantage. It means people blame you for the bad day. Like it might be unfair to be looked down upon, but strictly speaking "You can blame bad days as period cramps" just means you have an excuse to be a jerk. Technically an advantage. The last one doesn't really make sense either. There is only one "major world religion" with an actual active leader. There is no Trump's Chosen, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, or Protestant Pope. Females can absolutely lead local events as a protestant pastor, Buddhist nun, Hindu priest, etc and you can find historically important religious figures of all major world religions who are prominent females.
Heterosexual privilege has to be the weirdest. Like lets look at 2. Why...is romance between a man and a woman different between romance between a man and a man or a woman and a woman? Especially if we're talking about idealized fictional examples? Can gay people not learn what romance is from watching straight people? How does that work? Are they so alien and culturally divided that homosexual romance came from an entirely different source? Do their brains shut down if they see a man and a woman kissing preventing them from "learning" from these fictional examples? I'll rate optimistic on people not thinking a single guy adopting someone is some kind of creep, and I'm guessing most adults in the 2020s know the basics for how gay sex works and don't have to ask. It might be different if you bring transsexuals into the mix, but this is just a "homosexual" tab.
Found on Instagram:
They’re all such Annoyingly trivial examples. Imagine being a young girl who has been forced into marriage, or some genuine example of oppression, reading that. Yeah, you’ve been made to marry your cousin when you were twelve and threatened with death if you don’t obey, but THE POPE IS A BLOKE...! Have some humanity!
How are the muh patriarchy brigade dealing with the vast sex based differences in COVID death rates, by the way? I’m seeing lots of enjoyable shrieking about the fat phobia of weight based triage but silence on men being killed more. Is that the whiff of hypocrisy in the air?
That top post sums up most modern fanfiction and fandoms; half the time, they don’t even like they shows they wrote for, they just take one or two things they like and then twist the rest to fit their own tastes. Say what you will about older fanfiction, at least you got the feeling the fans liked the shows they wrote about.Presented to you: tumblr approach to writing
Wyświetl załącznik 1236448
Wyświetl załącznik 1236449
BTW, I cringed at "learing about relationships from movies" being treated like serious privelage, because most of romantic comedies leads act like total idiots.
"90 percent of time they're caricatures".Presented to you: tumblr approach to writing
Wyświetl załącznik 1236448
Wyświetl załącznik 1236449
BTW, I cringed at "learing about relationships from movies" being treated like serious privelage, because most of romantic comedies leads act like total idiots.
It gets worse. You wouldn't think it, but it does. Because (though Lindsay desperately wants it to be a hoax) it appears that one of the papers has someone arguing that, because they believe in the points of one of their fake articles about fat studies even though it was intended as a parody, it should be kept as an actual paper.You should go scroll through the twitter timeline of James Linsday, because he sort of functions as an amalgamation point for the crazy "Critical Theory" activists. At least, he will, until he finally completely loses his mind, staring into the abyss.
He's also one of the 3 academics that was involved in the recent "Sokal Squared Hoax" with Helen Pluckrose and Peter Bogohossian, where they wrote completely lunatic shit, submitted to peer review, and still got it published, because it used the correct format, and the proper lingo
Oh that is an absolute classic, I would hazard a guess that what the paper of much BS and fiction contains is important for Mr Geoff B E Cole to have in the published canon. He will be going along the line that 6 months or a year down the line its imaginary piss take origins will be forgotten and will work as a good reference point for further reeeeesearch of the feels over reality nature.It gets worse. You wouldn't think it, but it does. Because (though Lindsay desperately wants it to be a hoax) it appears that one of the papers has someone arguing that, because they believe in the points of one of their fake articles about fat studies even though it was intended as a parody, it should be kept as an actual paper.
This man, Geoff C. Cole, thinks that because people believed the paper and he agrees with it, it doesn't matter that it was all bullshit, it should be re-accepted anyway. I have to agree - I hope it's a hoax. Because otherwise it truly shows that some people in academia are beyond parody.
Oh that is an absolute classic, I would hazard a guess that what the paper of much BS and fiction contains is important for Mr Geoff B E Cole to have in the published canon. He will be going along the line that 6 months or a year down the line its imaginary piss take origins will be forgotten and will work as a good reference point for further reeeeesearch of the feels over reality nature.
I am inclined to agree, though have a predisposition to see ulterior motives in a lot of these lunatic articles and propositions. As an example the millionaire black woman is always worse off than any white man even if he is dirt poor and how her kids will be disadvantaged compared to white working class boys. Get this idea into the mainstream and there are calls to stop any affirmative action or investigation as to where education fails them, less competition for the middle class private educated classes. In some insane cases leg up grants will be given to a private (fee paying) school girl going onto uni because they are under privileged.Recursive Citation - "Make shit up, get twitter journos to report on it ambiguously enough other twitter journos will repeat it, so that wikipedants will write it into their articles, so that twitter journos can point at it and claim it's real."
E.g. - see every clickbait article ever written about "White men/straight men/gamers/insert hated demographic here hate this thing, because they're regressive scum and literally the most evil thing ever!", when the reality is either Fairly Angry Gamer is flailing like the exceptional closet faggot that he is, or some chan board made 3 posts about a troll op.
I am inclined to agree, though have a predisposition to see ulterior motives in a lot of these lunatic articles and propositions. As an example the millionaire black woman is always worse off than any white man even if he is dirt poor and how her kids will be disadvantaged compared to white working class boys. Get this idea into the mainstream and there are calls to stop any affirmative action or investigation as to where education fails them, less competition for the middle class private educated classes. In some insane cases leg up grants will be given to a private (fee paying) school girl going onto uni because they are under privileged. Here in the UK the biggest bleaters in the press about how they are subjected to great hardship due to being women or black etc are virtually all ex pupils of top fee paying schools and got into Oxford or Cambridge mostly due to that old school tie, they are the very privileged kids in some cases their parents were paying a very good professional's salary for their school fees. So part of me thinks that they want to keep as many down as they can by way of saying they are the ones who suffer. They go ballistic about those who question their evidence and conclusions especially as they do not want someone listening to an MRA talking about an education system that favours girls as the UK changes to exam/coursework percentage showed this to have some truth to it* or raising male DV victims or male genital mutilation, it kills off the narrative of perpetual victimhood and can bring about greater competition for their off spring.
When the first revamped A levels and then GCSE results came through after a greater emphasis on exams had been put back in place in many subjects for the first time in years boys achieved parity or in the harder sciences started to outstrip girls results. There were as would be expected articles from the usual places decrying the new sexist course structures that tested long term understanding of a subject over comment and forget.
Recursive Citation - "Make shit up, get twitter journos to report on it ambiguously enough other twitter journos will repeat it, so that wikipedants will write it into their articles, so that twitter journos can point at it and claim it's real."
E.g. - see every clickbait article ever written about "White men/straight men/gamers/insert hated demographic here hate this thing, because they're regressive scum and literally the most evil thing ever!", when the reality is either Fairly Angry Gamer is flailing like the exceptional closet faggot that he is, or some chan board made 3 posts about a troll op.