The italics are to emphasize what type of breastfeeding I am talking about. The covert verbal abuse telling me what I am thinking and feeling isn't necessary. But expected of you.
So when you put me under the moral judgment telescope to criticize, critique or otherwise comments on my parenting skills and style, there are constantly moral judgments you pass on me to denote superior and inferior for what I'm doing, but the reverse is not true when judging others? Interesting. And the reason for your moral relativism and bias? (Other than the fact that you admittedly don't follow The Torah?). Thanks for pointing out again just how morally degenerate you are.
And to the contrary, there ARE superior and inferior ways of breastfeeding. Just as you have to watch how a baby latches (inferior vs superior way of latching the baby), so there are techniques that serve the mother and baby better. No, billions of other women do not practice ecological breastfeeding. That is an incorrect statistic.
And to the contrary, ecological breastfeeding IS praiseworthy of a woman. Just like I would praise my child for doing A quality schoolwork, even though many children get As, it's still praiseworthy of them to do something excellent. ANY woman who practices ecological breastfeeding is deserving of praise. But I wouldn't expect a woman proud of her barren womb to understand that.
Telling women to use a breast pump is dehumanizing. Women aren't cattle. They don't need to be hooked up with pumps.
I'm seeing even clearer now why two women left you.
Marshall and I were just talking about this at dinner the other day....again.
No... you're a lizard though.
Yes, that's why I work at home. It allows me to balance ecological breastfeeding and being productive other ways. As a homeschool teacher, a homemaker and through my small business (not-for-profit). Like I said, my business has been in existence since 2008, still is. I have a book almost on the market, a patent, a series of outdoor classes that I will teach in the future, and I sell outdoor recreation supplies. Even my homeschool curriculum is copyrighted into my business. I also have more books and patents in the works, so hopefully one day it will be a nice for-profit business.
I'm enjoying working with my publisher. I get more control over the final product using a "vanity press".
No, I only have one profile (this one)
"Surviving edition"? It's not a "surviving edition". The Samaritan Torah, the DSS version of The Torah and The Masoretic Text ALL have a common language root: Paleo-HEBREW. There is NO scholastic evidence that there was a language from which Hebrew came. Hebrew was from Genesis 1. Hebrew is an eternal language. Always was, always is, always will be. That's why The Torah was written in Hebrew. The Torah is eternal.
Wouldn't surprise me if it was also called "the language of Canaan" because Noah's descendants went off to inhabit Canaan. Noah spoke Hebrew too.
Judaism is a branch of religious sects that came out of The Torah. Judaism is older than Adam and Chavah. But Adam and Chavah represent the beginning of Adamkind's walk with Elohim and they spoke Hebrew. They were the first people to receive The Torah
That's one theory, but I see The Torah as evidence of historical fact that literally happened