I'm going to go out on a limb here and say this is not ecological breast feeding. Even though the child can still have breast tard cum on demand. I guess anything that makes it more convenient for a mother to do something else besides nurse on demand is automatically inferior.
It also strikes me as very typical Melinda to want to draw attention to the particular philosophy she has about breast feeding. She's pointed out the ecological thing repeatedly, and since no one has taken the bait, she's started putting it in italics to try and draw more attention to it.
Save it Melinda. You breastfeed. We get it, so do billions of other women. The way you do it isn't notable, superior or special. No one cares.
The italics are to emphasize
what type of breastfeeding I am talking about. The covert verbal abuse telling me what I am thinking and feeling isn't necessary. But expected of you.
So when you put me under the moral judgment telescope to criticize, critique or otherwise comments on
my parenting skills and style, there are constantly moral judgments you pass on me to denote superior and inferior for what
I'm doing, but the reverse is not true when judging others? Interesting. And the reason for your moral relativism and bias? (Other than the fact that you admittedly don't follow The Torah?). Thanks for pointing out again just how morally degenerate you are.
And to the contrary, there ARE superior and inferior ways of breastfeeding. Just as you have to watch how a baby latches (inferior vs superior way of latching the baby), so there are techniques that serve the mother and baby
better. No, billions of other women do
not practice ecological breastfeeding. That is an incorrect statistic.
And to the contrary, ecological breastfeeding IS praiseworthy of a woman. Just like I would praise my child for doing A quality schoolwork, even though many children get As, it's still praiseworthy of them to do something excellent. ANY woman who practices ecological breastfeeding is deserving of praise. But I wouldn't expect a woman proud of her barren womb to understand that.
Remember, this stupid narcissist bought this over paying the rent or making sure her clearly underfed kids have at least a meal a day. Keep this in mind.
Also there is a machine called a breast pump that means you don't have to take your sprog to work and feed them on the clock. Just reheat to the right temp and boom, they're good.
Telling women to use a breast pump is dehumanizing. Women aren't cattle. They don't need to be hooked up with pumps.
I'm seeing even clearer now why two women left you.
@TamarYaelBatYah Who do you think is responsible for the dinosaur bone conspiracy and is planting fake fossils and bone configurations around the world?
Marshall and I were just talking about this at dinner the other day....again.
Lol, are you claiming that no one living before Genesis was written were actually human? Well what the fuck were they, then? Lizard people?
No... you're a lizard though.
it's something pagans do too, I noticed. And by pagans I mean those gothy new agey idiots. They don't like anything abrahamic so instead of God they say G-d
and yet you went off at me despite never needing to do either except for fixing-the-period reasons
again, is working in an office the only job you think women everywhere consider? Not in a kitchen with hot stoves and knives, not in construction, or factories or driving a truck. You really think it's offensive women can't breastfeed there when doing it during such a job is fucking stupid.
If you're worry about breastfeeding work at home. Nobody's stopping you there
Yes, that's why I work at home. It allows me to balance ecological breastfeeding and being productive other ways. As a homeschool teacher, a homemaker and through my small business (not-for-profit). Like I said, my business has been in existence since 2008, still is. I have a book almost on the market, a patent, a series of outdoor classes that I will teach in the future, and I sell outdoor recreation supplies. Even my homeschool curriculum is copyrighted into my business. I also have more books and patents in the works, so hopefully one day it will be a nice for-profit business.
I'm enjoying working with my publisher. I get more control over the final product using a "vanity press".
Is this you, Melinda?
@christamcl90
No, I only have one profile (this one)
The surviving edition of Genesis that scholars have found was written in Hebrew. That does not mean that when the events it's describing originally occurred, everyone was speaking Hebrew. Let's use our grown-up logic brains here.
You can't point to just Eve's Hebrew names, which could have easily been a translation of names belonging to an unknown language, and say that those you right beyond reasonable doubt either.
"Surviving edition"? It's not a "surviving edition". The Samaritan Torah, the DSS version of The Torah and The Masoretic Text ALL have a common language root: Paleo-HEBREW. There is NO scholastic evidence that there was a language from which Hebrew came. Hebrew was from Genesis 1. Hebrew is an eternal language. Always was, always is, always will be. That's why The Torah was written in Hebrew. The Torah is eternal.
Should I mention that it wasn't even called Hebrew back then but "the language of Canaan"?
You mean the epic space battles in the Vedas didn't happen?
Wouldn't surprise me if it was
also called "the language of Canaan" because Noah's descendants went off to inhabit Canaan. Noah spoke Hebrew too.
Hinduism came before Judaism. I guess god originally spoke Hindu.
Judaism is a branch of religious sects that came out of The Torah. Judaism is older than Adam and Chavah. But Adam and Chavah represent the beginning of Adamkind's walk with Elohim and they spoke Hebrew. They were the first people to receive The Torah
Also, just because someone wrote those events, doesn't mean those events literally happened.
That's one theory, but I see The Torah as evidence of historical fact that literally happened
