Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

So what happens if the TCPA is defeated and this goes to court, but Moronica haven't got any more funds?

Is there some kind of "throwing themselves at the mercy of the court" here?
They’re just gonna have to keep representing them with unpaid bills or have to settle and hope they get paid.
 
Filings are up if a kiwi wants to pay for them before any of the twitter idiots

Here’s couchettes preview and Army husband Dunford confirming what we already knew, the filings are shit, they use the privilege of filings to further defame yet again.

“A. No” hahahahaha literally redacted everything Vic said after NO
News flash Fürer Lemon head, Your “objection non responsive after No” Hasn’t been ruled on yet and Ty can still present the full answer to the court you fuckin idiot who’s not getting paid.
849135




MoRons TCPA is DOA


Nick is mentioned yet again (Judge Chupp is gonna love all that 3rd party nonsense that has nothing to do with asserting sexual allegations against Vic)


849154


849155


849156


849157


849159


849160


849161


849162


849163


849164


849166


849167
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Filings are up if a kiwi wants to pay for them before any of the twitter idiots

Here’s couchettes preview and Army husband Dunford confirming what we already knew, the filings are shit, they use the privilege of filings to further defame yet again. Nick is mentioned yet again (Judge Chupp is gonna love all that 3rd party nonsense that has nothing to do with asserting sexual allegations against Vic)
Wyświetl załącznik 849135



MoRons TCPA is DOA
THE FIRST FUCKING THING THEY PUT IN. SOMEONE TAKE ME OUT OF THIS CLOWNWORLD.
 
Filings are up if a kiwi wants to pay for them before any of the twitter idiots

Here’s couchettes preview and Army husband Dunford confirming what we already knew, the filings are shit, they use the privilege of filings to further defame yet again. Nick is mentioned yet again (Judge Chupp is gonna love all that 3rd party nonsense that has nothing to do with asserting sexual allegations against Vic)
Wyświetl załącznik 849135



MoRons TCPA is DOA
As a discerning observer, the first thing I’d want to know is what the uncensored version of that photo is, and what facial expression the woman is making.

And while I get the plan to continue defaming because they hate him and it’s all they have, I can’t help but wonder; what the fuck else can they do to him that’s worse than what’s alread been said and done? Are they gonna call him a rapist? Blacklist him? The damage is done, even if it still hurts to be continually defamed like this, Vic has nothing to lose.

Ty dropped a line about mutually assured destruction in the first hearing, which reminded me of a strategy that was considered during the Cold War; don’t immediately respond to a nuclear attack, and hold the enemy’s cities hostage as a way to leverage the situation. If you immediately retaliate and wipe them out, then they have nothing to lose, and will continue the offensive with a vengeance.

They have alread nuked Vic thoroughly, and nothing else they can throw at him will deter him, especially after they failed to produce anything damaging during depositions.

You lose motherfuckers.
 
So what happens if the TCPA is defeated and this goes to court, but Moronica haven't got any more funds?

Is there some kind of "throwing themselves at the mercy of the court" here?

Ty and Nick went over this on their livestream last night:

1. If MoRonica wins the TCPA that this is lawsuit doesn't count as defamation Vic owes Monica and Ron Toye (an alleged Pedophile) legal fees. The case is thrown out.

2. If Emporor Tyranicus Bearidus defeats this motion on the grounds that the TCPA/Anti-SLAPP was frivolous then MoRonica owes Vic Legal fees. The case resumes.


Honestly there was no path forward for Casey and Da Fuhrer to go as MoRonica probably hasn't paid them one shekel yet.
 
As a discerning observer, the first thing I’d want to know is what the uncensored version of that photo is, and what facial expression the woman is making.

And while I get the plan to continue defaming because they hate him and it’s all they have, I can’t help but wonder; what the fuck else can they do to him that’s worse than what’s alread been said and done? Are they gonna call him a rapist? Blacklist him? The damage is done, even if it still hurts to be continually defamed like this, Vic has nothing to lose.

Ty dropped a line about mutually assured destruction in the first hearing, which reminded me of a strategy that was considered during the Cold War; don’t immediately respond to a nuclear attack, and hold the enemy’s cities hostage as a way to leverage the situation. If you immediately retaliate and wipe them out, then they have nothing to lose, and will continue the offensive with a vengeance.

They have alread nuked Vic thoroughly, and nothing else they can throw at him will deter him, especially after they failed to produce anything damaging during depositions.

You lose motherfuckers.

That picture and that part of the article was debunked by the very person in the picture of the article itself.

They’re betting on ty not having and affidavit for it but the public statements she made (because the article was public) will be enough to defeat that part of the TCPA

They lost this case as soon as it began, twitter law knows it’s lost and continue to pretend liability lies on Nick because Nick has constantly proved them wrong and humiliated them worse than he humiliated Shane.

They have NOTHING.

THIS is what they said was “coming” for MONTHS now. They’re fucking jokes and now everyone knows they are except for the SJW believe wahhhmen crowd.
 
I'm simultaneously laughing at this hilarity while shaking my head at their strategy of using the shield of official court documentation to further slag Vic.

Ty and Nick went over this on their livestream last night:

1. If MoRonica wins the TCPA that this is lawsuit doesn't count as defamation Vic owes Monica and Ron Toye (an alleged Pedophile) legal fees. The case is thrown out.

2. If Emporor Tyranicus Bearidus defeats this motion on the grounds that the TCPA/Anti-SLAPP was frivolous then MoRonica owes Vic Legal fees. The case resumes.


Honestly there was no path forward for Casey and Da Fuhrer to go as MoRonica probably hasn't paid them one shekel yet.
To elaborate, a TCPA can be successful (MoRon is removed from the case), partially successful (Court finds that there is a prima facie case for some causes of action, but not others, and/or BHBH has to submit an amended pleading), or defeated (let's go to trial, bitches).

Also if the motion is defeated it doesn't automatically mean Ty gets awarded fees. It only happens if it's shown than the TCPA was frivolous.
 
It appears to me that they are creating tons of fact disputes. At least in the area that I'm familiar with, getting judgments as a matter of law involves pointing out the complaint is LEGALLY deficiency and amending it further would be futile. Beyond the unprofessional and bombastic rhetoric (which most judges hate by the way), this seems like a war over facts, a matter only a jury can weigh and resolve.
 
As e.

Ty dropped a line about mutually assured destruction in the first hearing, which reminded me of a strategy that was considered during the Cold War; don’t immediately respond to a nuclear attack, and hold the enemy’s cities hostage as a way to leverage the situation. If you immediately retaliate and wipe them out, then they have nothing to lose, and will continue the offensive with a vengeance.

They have alread nuked Vic thoroughly, and nothing else they can throw at him will deter him, especially after they failed to produce anything damaging during depositions.

Wargames is a movie that I'll put dollars to donuts Ty grew up watching. There's a scene in there that describes M.A.D very clearly, very simply, and very elegantly. I highly urge those of you who have not seen it, go watch the movie. The tech was cutting edge at the time (80s) you can safely ignore much of it, take the context into consideration.

Also Sun Tzu's saying about trapping the enemy in the corner, for when you do that they have nowhere else to go but ATTACK. Always give your enemy a way out that you know of and can control. Das Fuhrer Lemoneysnicket and LowTshots gave Vic no other option as surrender is equivalent to Social Death( and loss of income) so Vic must continue to fight until the end.
 
When you’re so bad at law (I was going to say Texas law but cuck lightyear is bad at all law) you don’t understand Texas rules of evidence 103 (d) does not apply to TCPA in a civil suit that hasn’t been to a jury stage yet.



That whole twitter thread in general is a remarkable laugh if you want to read through the direct link of couchette taking out of context clips as a nice GOTCHA to the case. I’d archive it all but then it would have to go in the couchette thread and not in this law thread.

They still haven’t learned that context is what’s going to lose them their TCPAs and this case in the first place.

Edit: Holy fucking shit he doesn’t even understand sarcasm OR how Minnesota shield laws work



I’m going to have to crosspost this shit in the couchette thread now
Greg don't understand Irony.

Draw your own conclusions.

EDIT:
849239



With this statement, the are literally begging for more bullshit testimony/affidavits.

(EDIT 2: They again say that Vic is "The Fuhrer"... But.. JShawn is also know as the Fuhrer no ? Does it proove something ?)
 
Ostatnio edytowane:

Did this motherfucker really just quote himself? Stunning legal cite there, Greg.

He’s either got his head embedded in his asshole, or he’s panicking to salvage his ego. There’s no way a sensible person would read the affidavit as anything but absolutely disastrous for Rial. Stan was named as a fact witness and disputes the claim, under oath, full stop. No amount of pedantry over wording is going to change that fact I’m the eyes of the court.

Sure, “I don’t remember to my knowledge and I would have acted quite differently over the years had this occurred and I had witnessed it” is technically different than “This didn’t happen”, but god damn you’d have to be dense to think that it doesn’t at least put Rial’s honesty in question.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Sure, “I don’t remember to my knowledge and I would have acted quite differently over the years had this occurred and I had witnessed it” is technically different than “This didn’t happen”, but god damn you’d have to be dense to think that it doesn’t at least put Rial’s honesty in question.

Stan's affidavit logically entails "This didn't happen."

1. I dont remember this happening.
2. If this had happened, I would remember it
Therefore, this didn't happen.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole