- Dołączono
- 11 Cze 2019
I thought states were imitating CA when they did it. It's one of those dumb things people see and imitate but I think it is generally neither necessary nor even a good idea. It's supposed to be for defendants who you know to exist but do not know their actual names at present, presumably to find out later.
A lot of times you will see a plaintiff throw in these dumb Doe defendants and then not even mention them in the complaint.
And federal courts just completely ignore them if you remove the case from a state court to federal court. Who are these people? Where are they? Nome, Alaska? The Moon? What did they do? Cast a voodoo curse on you? They're apparently invisible, as they're not alleged to have actually done anything.
I rarely see these things properly used. I think they just make you look like a crazy person suing invisible people nobody can see for who knows what.
Like twitch suing Artifact troll streamers and complaining that they had to do their jobs and not make their website be absolute shit in their complaint for damages lmao.
They’re lucky the subpoenas they sent out for information on said John Does we’re mainly to other CA companies.