Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku damian
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
The problem is that document won't come into play until after the trial if Vic wins. Then the defendants lawyer could go through their own clients tweets to try and find damaging defamatory statements not in the document. Its all about the damages and the defense will use what is not in the letter to say "this is what caused damage" to lower how much their clients have to pay. It's a real nothing burger right now and its funny that KickVic is latching onto this Red Herring of sorts.
Everything is a red herring. Their star witness' story is that Vic didn't fuck her when she was 16 and tossed her out of a get together at his place. They make it sound as bad as possible with framing. But for those of us who grew up in the pre-cellphone pre-helicopterparent GenX era know that finagling your way into college parties in HS by bullshitting was very much a thing. Especially for girls. If one that was too young was smoked out, she got bounced. Nobody wanted problems with angry parents the next day.

That looks to me like what happened.
 
What a stupidly convoluded and pointless gay op. Why would warning people that someone is sending fake emails in their name have anything to do with the letters? Ty already said publicly that he did send them. I just see it as too big of a stretch that anyone would assume them making the announcement and is them trying to disprove the letters.

You're giving these idiots on twitter too much credit, they are just being exceptional as usual, they are not following any plan. The ultimate objective of this gay op may have been to bait whathever youtubers they sent emails to into making a negative video about Ty Beard and how Vic's lawyers are trying to silence and harass his critics, using Ty's boomer call outs to the KF as proof - they are already pushing for that narrative on twitter anyway.

As for Nick, it might have been an attempt at geting Buzzfeed involved to write a woke piece on him - the youtube drunk lawyer who tried to bribe them; the farms and this whole shitshow. Which failed because whoever did it didn't expect Buzzfeed to be shady and broke enough to accept the bribe and contact Nick.
Agreed. I believe it was an ill-conceived op to get some sympathetic smear merchants to grab onto the KV narrative and run with it. Had this been pre-Covington, I would fully expect some so-called journalist to have already begun to spin the lore. However, with the judgement going against Oberlin and Covington pending, the legal option has been engaged and the click bait hacks seem to have slowed their roll. (Whether that is from their own sense of self-preservation, or instruction from the legal department is anyone's guess.)

I get that, however, the document is in play in the court of public opinion. A few select parts have been made public in order to humiliate BHBH. Their tweet warning people about fake documents going around didn't help in that regard. It gives the appearance that they are trying to portray these embarrassing statements as being fabricated, which anyone can see right through. That might have been purpose of a BuzzFeed OP with Nick. They get Nick to think someone is impersonating him, he gets BHBH to tweet about it and BHBH is made to look like they are desperately trying to get out in front of the narrative that they are a bunch of clowns who send out legal notices about what Jesus would do, how Vic isn't a bad person and that he can't be a piece of shit.
I think your tin foil hat is on too tight. It seems to have cut off circulation to your brain. Just a reminder of Hanlon's Razor:Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Edit to add: Sorry for the double-post. something something boomer. I'll figure it out.
 
People should really not try to frame a sixteen-year-old attempted hookup as a justifiable thing. This mainly came from BoingoTango or whatever his name is but don’t take that bait. Don’t give an inch to any claim without proof. Agreeing to the hypothetical claim but saying “oh 16 is legul” just makes Vic and people defending Vic look terrible.

It also gives the KickVic side the ability to say that people with Vic are okay with grown men going for young teens in high school.
Please don’t open that can of worms.
 
People should really not try to frame a sixteen-year-old attempted hookup as a justifiable thing. This mainly came from BoingoTango or whatever his name is but don’t take that bait. Don’t give an inch to any claim without proof. Agreeing to the hypothetical claim but saying “oh 16 is legul” just makes Vic and people defending Vic look terrible.

It also gives the KickVic side the ability to say that people with Vic are okay with grown men going for young teens in high school.
Please don’t open that can of worms.
Did he fuck her? No? Then why even bring up age of consent. It doesnt apply.
What we have is yet another "he hugged me the wrong way" accusation of bullshit.
As to why she was there point out that 16yo girls will lie about their age to get access to social gatherings of older people with alcohol. It's not like they card people at house parties.
 
Agreed. I believe it was an ill-conceived op to get some sympathetic smear merchants to grab onto the KV narrative and run with it. Had this been pre-Covington, I would fully expect some so-called journalist to have already begun to spin the lore. However, with the judgement going against Oberlin and Covington pending, the legal option has been engaged and the click bait hacks seem to have slowed their roll. (Whether that is from their own sense of self-preservation, or instruction from the legal department is anyone's guess.)

The biggest thing that has caused the tapering off of the Clickbait .outrage merchants is the money stopped. In particular the well hidden Obama era secret government subsidies that poured into outfits like Vox, Huffington Post, etc ended. They’ve run out of other people’s money. Even Soros has been cutting back and narrowing his subsidizing down to more specific channels.
 
I love it everybody who disagrees is "just mad", but when your heros flip out and act like idiots, it's all cool acceptable and understandable




I mean most of what I was bitching about stemmed from the two recent greg streams, but if it really makes you feel like you got one over on me that you bothered emspex to come move these pages of content, good for you sperglord

But when I came over here, everyone said it was STILL the wrong thread. I actually thought I was threadbanned from here to until I got a notification and came back to see that I wasn't.




Oh shit, I had no idea THIS is what you were all so concerned over, and not just that you guys were looking for any little thing to nitpick this guy insulting your fav. What research have you done besides hug Nick's nutsack this entire time? BY THE WAY, doing research implys you get your facts from more than one source, especially when that source has a horse in the race and is a fucking lawyer....



Hell, I mean Nick and Ty haven't done enough research to realize you aren't going to win a defamation lawsuit in Texas. The only one I've seen mentioned got overturned in April. Hence why the only thing Ty had to say about it during the stream was "Really? Really?‽ REALLY?‽" Stunning. A Master Debater.




Oh god the calling card of any mildly succesful person on the internet. UJUSTJEALOUS BRA

No, that's just me laughing at you idiots pouring your money done the drain.



Why are you trying to imply that 75k isn't a significant sum of money?

I mean you're right they'd never do anything illegal or unethical. They're lawyers. The most moral among us.


SECRET GAY OPS MAN, SECRET GAY OPS MAN


iu




You mean where they exercised their personal right to allow who they did and didn't want based on people being uncomfortable around him?

Though I guess these are weebs we are talking about. We are supposed to let any pedophile dogfucker a speaking position if they want it....



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, Oh yes. That's exactly what I've seen here so far. Those three things is all I've seen from you faggots on this section of the board. I mean I haven't had this problems in other sections of the farms yet. But you people here are especially awwtistic.

You really want to say I ignore or black criticism when the first reaction of you hapless fuckwits is to try to send me thread-hopping, posting shitty rage-comic era memes, or getting me thread banned.

Well guess what, as far as I'm concerned I have mods permission to talk here, so go fuck yourself.



I mean good for Nick. I'd take the money too, but you guys are still pretty cringey for giving this man so much money, when he's a lawyer whose obviously already doing pretty well for himself.


The GoFundMe clearly says that any remaining money is going to the Salvation Army.

Holy shit, can you even keep up with the events? We know we’re not getting the money back, you dumb asshole.






Oh god, you're right they ARE the great authority on the subject and we should listen to every word they have to say on this and not question it.

I mean I'm not going to get into the goddamn legalese letter of the law debate. But it is pretty silly to think you are going to win a defamation case because an employer rids themselves of someone due to allegations. That shit just happens every day.

I've seen someone fired at my job for just asking for a girl's number. She even gave him the number, but because someone saw it and reported it he got fired.

So I really don't think US Law is gonna give a fuck that they won't let the person being accused of groping girls in skimply outfits in the place where they fucking live.
Brevity is the soul of wit you fucking sped. No one want’s to read an essay every other post here. Just get your goddamn point across.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
THIS. So much. This whole community REEKS of gamergate, incel bullshit. It's really embarassing. Part of the reason I quoted the sticky is because it says something about not wanting this to be the next gamergate. But here you are being just that autistic.



Nah nigger, you guys just 'always want to be right' That's why the only thing 99% of you have done is try to characterize me as some faggot SJW #Metoo #kickvic supporter.

You guys are so fucking sure you are right, and all you have done for "research" is watch Nick talk about it and feed you information. It's really cringey and embarassing. Hell, I didn't even care about this whole thing. I was done with it and sick of hearing about it. But once I found you autistic motherfuckers, and moreso, the hilarity of Ty and Nick getting so butthurt over that Greg faggot, I can no say I'm firmly on the side of being against it, because the shit is so ridiculous.




I mean most of what I started bitching about was how autistic nick was acting in that fucking stream. I even started it with a gif pulled directly from it, but if it makes you all feel better to discuss it here. Be my motherfucking guest.




I'm just saying that he lied when he later said he tried to get Ty Beard not to call you fuckwits into action.
It's also kinda cringey they doxxed him just because he wouldn't come on their stream so they could stir up some controversy so they can get more donations.
It's not doing any damage to the guy it's just really awtistic, especially because they didn't find anything lulsworthy



Again, like I've said, that's an opinon that has developed as I've been watching him handle this greg situation. He wants so bad to paint him as butthurt, but he literally goes on a 3 hours tirade where he's slamming the desk and the audio keeps going on, and he's red-faced, veins bulging foaming at the mouth. It was really pathetic.

I mean i'm still on the look out for when Nick has good streams about shit that isn't exceptional, like the ones with Josh.




Sounds about right for someone nuthugging anyone the second they defend someone of being accused of any sexual assault shit.




And here's a real girl, because I know you don't see em too much
iu


Uh... Someone really likes big black cocks, don't they?

I like mine way better

b1b4ce20c94dbdfc3a6e724b509e01fd.gif





Evidently you all care a great deal.

Wyświetl załącznik 792380


(Edit: I spent over thirty minutes on this, I wish I could rate myself as autistic)
Learn to quote
 
Did he fuck her? No? Then why even bring up age of consent. It doesnt apply.
What we have is yet another "he hugged me the wrong way" accusation of bullshit.
As to why she was there point out that 16yo girls will lie about their age to get access to social gatherings of older people with alcohol. It's not like they card people at house parties.
I’ll write this out again. Don’t take someone’s hypothetical and run with it. The more you argue over something not proven all it makes others see is that there might be something there.

Saying “oh she was there” to “oh they were together” to “oh he mightve tried to hook up with her but she was in the wrong” is a terrible way to combat these imaginary accusations. Thats giving the people the ammo they need to paint Vic as a terrible person.
Just say “prove this happened faggots”. That’s all anyone has to say
 
I’ll write this out again. Don’t take someone’s hypothetical and run with it. The more you argue over something not proven all it makes others see is that there might be something there.

Saying “oh she was there” to “oh they were together” to “oh he mightve tried to hook up with her but she was in the wrong” is a terrible way to combat these imaginary accusations. Thats giving the people the ammo they need to paint Vic as a terrible person.
Just say “prove this happened faggots”. That’s all anyone has to say
A good way of going about it is researching Vic's history and resume at the time. Narrow down the window of when it could have happened, then try to have them prove it within that time frame. Because Casey has fucked that story by claiming it happened in early 1989, when she claims that it happened some time in the summer, as well as her own PULL story fucking it by showing inconsistencies between the two tellings.
 
People should really not try to frame a sixteen-year-old attempted hookup as a justifiable thing. This mainly came from BoingoTango or whatever his name is but don’t take that bait. Don’t give an inch to any claim without proof. Agreeing to the hypothetical claim but saying “oh 16 is legul” just makes Vic and people defending Vic look terrible.

It also gives the KickVic side the ability to say that people with Vic are okay with grown men going for young teens in high school.
Please don’t open that can of worms.

It's been said before but we're not Vic's personal army, PR team or lawyers. It's not our job to defend Vic.

The best reason for not engaging trolls is that it's a waste of time and energy. Whether something makes Vic "look terrible" is not our concern.
 
I’ll write this out again. Don’t take someone’s hypothetical and run with it. The more you argue over something not proven all it makes others see is that there might be something there.

Saying “oh she was there” to “oh they were together” to “oh he mightve tried to hook up with her but she was in the wrong” is a terrible way to combat these imaginary accusations. Thats giving the people the ammo they need to paint Vic as a terrible person.
Just say “prove this happened faggots”. That’s all anyone has to say
How about you piss off and not tell me what to say, k? I don't have a side in this and I am not going to self censor. We aren't the autistic illuminati, remember?

I'm just here for lulz and could give a hot fuck what anyone thinks about the optics in twitter dangerhair weebdom. Oh noes maybe they will create a Vic fanfic where he touches a naked boob. It is far too scandalous for my tender ears.

Motherfuckers don't have him getting past second base in any of their accusations. If they want to continue to pretend that a "serial harraser/rapist" went 30 years of "abusing" women and never managed to get his dick wet once with any of them, that is their prerogative. They are going to make mountains out of molehills with the red herrings regardless.
 
No one talking about this?

799642


"Shift a bit"

I'm guessing Nick was by Ty and co to stop talking about the case since the past few days has been kind of a bad look for Vic and co. It's all getting more and more GamerGate everyday.
 
No one talking about this?

Wyświetl załącznik 799642

"Shift a bit"

I'm guessing Nick was by Ty and co to stop talking about the case since the past few days has been kind of a bad look for Vic and co. It's all getting more and more GamerGate everyday.

Actually, it's not that. It's the fact that he hasn't had a stream for 3 days (when he usually has one), and that tomorrow's stream will be the first in a while.

YT content will shift because he's having to be mobile.

No, Nick isn't going to stop talking about the case. I can guarantee you that. There's too much gayops going on to NOT talk about it.
 
A bad look, you say? Exactly what has Vic "and co" done to look bad? Or are you referring to the spergs on the other side of the fence who continue to provide zero evidence for their claims, intentionally repeat and mislead people with info already known of and/or debunked, or collaborate on GayOps that reveal the true nature of their respective characters?
 
A bad look, you say? Exactly what has Vic "and co" done to look bad? Or are you referring to the spergs on the other side of the fence who continue to provide zero evidence for their claims, intentionally repeat and mislead people with info already known of and/or debunked, or collaborate on GayOps that reveal the true nature of their respective characters?

Yes, that's what I'm referring to, and the perception of it at large.

Actually, it's not that. It's the fact that he hasn't had a stream for 3 days (when he usually has one), and that tomorrow's stream will be the first in a while.

YT content will shift because he's having to be mobile.

No, Nick isn't going to stop talking about the case. I can guarantee you that. There's too much gayops going on to NOT talk about it.

Sounded to me like he's thinking about making the channel less focused on Vic going forward. He's obviously not going to stop talking about it but doesn't this read like he's going to discuss it less, especially when all there is to talk about is twitter drama.
 
No one talking about this?

Wyświetl załącznik 799642

"Shift a bit"

I'm guessing Nick was by Ty and co to stop talking about the case since the past few days has been kind of a bad look for Vic and co. It's all getting more and more GamerGate everyday.

He already said the content would be different during Anime Matsuri. Not only is Nick going to be there along with Ty and Vic, other streamers like Hero Hei and TUG are already there with more to come. He was already talking about possibly streaming a panel.

This isn't a sudden change.

You are right about weeb wars getting more and more like GG every day, though. That's fairly inevitable and it's not going to stop any time soon as more and more hangers on try to exploit it for their 15 minutes of fame.
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole