US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
The hell did that accomplish? This isnt the 70s where this sort of thing was a massive political statement
After that fellow set himself on fire for Palestine or that one guy set himself ablaze on the whitehouse lawn this isnt powerful anymore. Its GAY
It's NYC, you can just ride the subway and get lit on fire, you don't even need to do it yourself anymore!
 
>Majorly Christian country
>Invite muslim refugees cuz Empathy™
>Country becomes a islamic shithole with little pushback
Oh g-d... Im... Im NOOOOOTICING!!!
The Muslims apparently had better birth rates then the Christians (who narrowly had the majority in Lebanon's 1932 census) and when the Lebanese Civil War happened, the Christians had their own paramilitaries. A lot of Lebanon's history as a state unfortunately seems to be one of a weak polarized government trying to fend off groups with more unified leadership and foreign funding such as the Palestine Liberation Organization and Hezbollah.
 
The browns wouldn't be speaking understandable languages were it not for the tireless selfless work of Christian missionaries.
The culture would not be so accepting of people of other skin colors and nationalities, were it not for the work of the teachings of Jesus Christ. We are all brothers and sisters under God, we must sacrifice ourselves to help others in need. When I see a man in need, regardless of if he's brown and on another continent, my heart cries in pain, I can't not give entire paychecks of my money, even sell my belongings, my future and the future of my children, to help the brown man on another continent in need! I an grateful for the tireless work of Christian religious organizations that organize missionary work, help vaccinate, feed and heal the fellow man, regardless of his skin color or nationality. If the economic situation in his home country is so dire, say because of American evil imperialists waging a war of aggression on the innocent people - my brothers and sisters in Christ - I will happily take them into my own country, no matter how many of them there are! The more souls saved the better, and I'm grateful to the Christian organizations that are working to give these people the ability to travel to our country and to emigrate and become our citizens! Praise the Lord, brothers and sisters!
Yes saar you are correct I'm just a dhimmi benchod you are bramhim saar
 
the left became as powerful as they are today by taking small victories for decades
The left became powerful through an aggressive use of violence, and a dogmatic adherence to the collective, two things that the right simply does not have. The right is constantly infighting, and when they do gain ground they can't hold it. The left managed to completely dominate every institution from education to science and media over the course of about a decade, and a decade later we are only getting small surface level victories.

I'm not saying we shouldn't try or be happy, but we also shouldn't be complacent and most right wingers are. "We got Trump in office we win boys!" Then people stop paying attention and we backpedal everything we gained.
 
The Soviet Union was birthed with communism, China was birthed in Communism.

This isn't about what states are successors to what, this is whether an ideology that destroys nations can be considered an ideology that destroys nations if there are nations that still draped themselves in facade of still carrying that certain ideology while having actually abandoned that ideology and reformed their society with functional laws and norms that lead to their rise.

You argue Christianity didn't collapse the Roman Empire because the Holy Roman Empire persisted for years despite being Christian in name (Which lets all be for real, you would likely still argue that even if the Byzantine Empire did not explicitly declared itself a successor to the Roman Empire).
And I am saying you could literally say the same thing for Communism because even though the Soviet Union collapsed, China is still existing therefore Communism doesn't collapse nations.

Christianity and Communism are religions/ideologies that cause nations to collapse.
Any surviving communist nations still exist because any nation that still adhered to Communism as its system of Government and way it works have died of sooner or later. Any Communist nation that still lives like Vietnam, or China still exist because of the fact that they basically abandoned Communism and reworked their laws and economy to a sort of mostly capitalist and workable system in general that allows them to continue surviving. It's not "proof" that communism doesn't destroy nations when its applied to the truest extent.

The same thing happened with the Holy Roman Empire and future European nations that call themselves "christians" but do not actually adhere to Christian values.
Like Communist china which is "Communist" in name only, they are "Christian" in name only and the only surviving ones are the ones that do not adhere to strict Christianity that leads to the collapse of nations.
Okay well, I think you're making several crucial errors in this post here.

1. China is infamous for surviving in spite of and in large part by ditching Communism, as many an online tankie has lamented. They are notorious for scrapping the core of Communist ideology & embracing what said online tankies like to denounce as 'state capitalism' in order to not die. This was absolutely not the case for the Byzantines, to whom Christianity remained a key pillar of their society & thought from start to bitter finish. Nobody, not even the Latin Catholics post-Great Schism, ever seriously argued that they weren't actual Christians.

2. Yes, Communism does indeed inevitably cause nations to collapse and every country that has survived it (without just becoming non-communist outright) did so by ditching the Communist ideology in all but name. But no, the opposite has historically proven to be quite true of Christian kingdoms and in fact most of the great Christian empires of history reached their peak when they were at their most devoutly religious, like Spain (started becoming an empire under rulers literally nicknamed the 'Catholic Monarchs' and peaked under Philip II, a strong contender for the title of 'most fanatical Catholic ruler ever') or Britain (Victorian society has its reputation as a pious time of 'repressive' sexual morals to this day for good reason).

3. I think the biggest mistake you're making is assuming that the great Christian empires somehow 'did not actually adhere to Christian values'. This is an error I see tons of people making these days, up to & including author GRRM, this assumption that the people of old didn't actually believe in their religion because that kind of fervent religiosity seems so alien to the modern mindset & the society we (assuming nobody on KF is posting from, let's say, Uganda or the Vatican) live in that we can't really grasp it, and/or we project (subconsciously or consciously) our own mindset onto the people living back then.

But it is the case that medieval/early modern people did absolutely believe in their religion, hence events like the Holy Roman Emperor Henry IV kneeling barefoot in the snow for 3 days and begging the Pope for forgiveness after getting excommunicated (hardly something he would do if he were a cynical powermonger in the vein of modern politicians). Or you know, the jihads being met with crusades & holy leagues, thousands upon thousands of Europeans leaving their homes & everything they've ever known to fight the Saracen for Christ & the Cross. Medieval nobles bestowing huge sums on the construction of cathedrals and other edifices to God that they in all probability wouldn't survive to see completed in their lifetimes, etc. There's also no reason to assume that most medieval nobles just went around raping & killing everyone and generally living like Game of Thrones characters, they generally at least tried to live by the virtues of the Christian church (which incidentally proved quite conducive to having a functioning society).

You might say, 'well so-and-so was an adulterous nigger or murderer (or whatever else), he can hardly claim to be truly living Christian values' but the whole point of Christianity is that all humans are fallen, it's expected for everyone to fuck up (and those with power tend to fuck up harder than most), what matters is that you get back up & keep trying to walk the Christian path. This was certainly well understood in the Middle Ages too, and the teachings were taken seriously by those who heard them. I guarantee there's a better than even chance 'so-and-so' tried their damndest to die in good standing with the Church, confessing & receiving the Last Rites or whatever sacraments his sect had for the dead/dying, and if he was a king or noble he probably tried bequeathing land & wealth to the Church too, out of a sincere fear of burning forever in Hell and going all the way back to Constantine I.

It is pretty rare to find a medieval noble who was totally content with dying in sin & not even trying to repent for any of the crazy shit they may or may not have done, and such cases (like Galeazzo Sforza, one of the most niggerish dukes of Milan) pretty much always met a sticky end due to the enemies they'd make. Which incidentally is why another Martinesque trope, that of medieval nobility being totally amoral & treacherous cunts backstabbing everyone around them constantly, doesn't stand up to scrutiny either - lord-vassal relationships were founded on trust & honor and someone who tried to act like a modern corporate shark in the feudal pool would just end up getting murked (probably sooner rather than later) because nobody else could trust them, which is exactly what befell the most notorious turncoat of ASOIAF's historical inspiration the Wars of the Roses (Baron Wenlock) among others.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The only thing that is more of a constant in China than being just a succession of brutal dictatorships, is the confucian mentality of never bothering to fight against it, because the only outcome other than death is just having another brutal dictator take over.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
required viewing when Chinaposting

When the going gets tough the Chinese eat the civilian populace to prepare for final victory. Say what you want about the chinks, thats some scary level of determination to not lose the long game.
 
What's your point here? that abortion is good because 42% of abortions are black? a bit ghoulish.
Holy fuck, he sat down with a pajeet to tell you “ackshully she’s just as American as you are mf, if yah really wanna know da troof about it bish”. All this right after the White foid, with haitian niglets, in the Supreme Court stabbed us all in the back over birthright citizenship.
It's not being stabbed in the back because you didn't get what you wanted.
 
The browns wouldn't be speaking understandable languages were it not for the tireless selfless work of Christian missionaries.
The culture would not be so accepting of people of other skin colors and nationalities, were it not for the work of the teachings of Jesus Christ. We are all brothers and sisters under God, we must sacrifice ourselves to help others in need. When I see a man in need, regardless of if he's brown and on another continent, my heart cries in pain, I can't not give entire paychecks of my money, even sell my belongings, my future and the future of my children, to help the brown man on another continent in need! I an grateful for the tireless work of Christian religious organizations that organize missionary work, help vaccinate, feed and heal the fellow man, regardless of his skin color or nationality. If the economic situation in his home country is so dire, say because of American evil imperialists waging a war of aggression on the innocent people - my brothers and sisters in Christ - I will happily take them into my own country, no matter how many of them there are! The more souls saved the better, and I'm grateful to the Christian organizations that are working to give these people the ability to travel to our country and to emigrate and become our citizens! Praise the Lord, brothers and sisters!
You can't refute that this is exactly what the Christian church teaches its followers. It directly teaches to accept other races and cultures, to sacrifice ourselves for them, to think of them as equals, to have blind compassion. This is exactly the kind of thought that brings you into a society where suicidal empathy is the norm, and that is committing suicide.
Yes, of course there are enemies of Christians that want to destroy them this way too, by bringing in other faiths and cultures, to make Christians one of many, not a majority any more. But anyone that thinks of it in a black and white way is foolish. The Church, most denominations of Christian churches, are subverted and being destroyed from the inside out, by its own doctrines and actions, harming of all of its followers.
I was baptized and raised Catholic when I was a kid, I was really deep into the faith. This is exactly what I got out of it. If I didn't deprogram myself, and was way dumber, I'd be a raging leftist Antifa type, because that's what the natural consequence of these teachings are. Being racist is incompatible with being a Christian. Racism is incompatible with Christian universalism, one of the core doctrines of the orthodoxy.
I don't know how the Christian Identitarians can call themselves Christian, other than if the Christian church wasn't always universalist, I don't know much about its history and schisms and all that. I think the main reason that they call themselves Christian Identitarians is that they were raised Christian, in a Christian society, and they equate that to having good morals and a stable civilization. But if they're a schism, they can call themselves whatever. I consider myself this, Identitarian, standing completely with my own genetic people, unless they're race traitors. Nobody else, not closely enough related to me, can be part of my faith, especially not any browns or mutts or savages.
 
2. Yes, Communism does indeed inevitably cause nations to collapse and every country that has survived it (without just becoming non-communist outright) did so by ditching the Communist ideology in all but name. But no, the opposite has historically proven to be quite true of Christian kingdoms and in fact most of the great Christian empires of history reached their peak when they were at their most devoutly religious, like Spain (started becoming an empire under rulers literally nicknamed the 'Catholic Monarchs' and peaked under Philip II, a strong contender for the title of 'most fanatical Catholic ruler ever') or Britain (Victorian society has its reputation as a pious time of 'repressive' sexual morals to this day for good reason).
The hilarity of it all is that the modern PRC is basically a National Socialist state. Much like Marx expected the Germans to be the ones that went Communist and would probably have been horrified at the Russians doing it, Hitler would probably have had a double take at the Ching Chongs turning into Nazis.

Also to reinforce your point, the high point of the Post-Manzikert ERE was the first two Komnenian Emperors, both Alexios and especially Ioannis known for their personal piety. Ioannis being know as the Beautiful wasn't because of his appearance, but the state of his soul. Moderns, especially in America, often see religion as an aesthetic choice and apply that to people in the past. As opposed to something that they actually believed. Godfrey, the first king of Jerusalem, refused to take the title of King because he refused to wear a crown of gold in the city where Christ wore a crown of thorns. There's the story of King Clovis of the Franks, after converting and while being taught about the Crucifixion was said to have leapt from his seat and declared that if he'd been there, he and his Franks would have avenged the wrongs done to Christ. I mean, missing the point, but his heart was in the right place. This is why God grafted us Indo-Europeans to the tree of Abraham. We're retarded, but in the directionally correct way, and we can believe and obey.
 
so in other news, Kiev got lit the fuck UP the other night

both sides are intentionally targeting civilian residential high rise apartments with intent to collapse the buildings with all occupants, dont believe the bullshiters, Ive watched this thing from the very first days, THIS IS A BIG ESCALATION, both sides took efforts up to this point to TRY to avoid conspicuously civilian residential for half a dozen militarily sound principles

but that attack from Ukraine into Moscow COMBINED with the extreme failure of the Pantsir missile defense system resulting in multiple blue on blue strikes. The most well known as seen one was that crazy video of the massive oil storage tank "blowing its top", that was a Russian air defense missile going astray has made this escalate into a new level

so within all of that attacks FOR SOME REASON, Kiev decided it was a good time to start striking high rises and we arent sure yet if that was intentional or not but the gloves seem to be off now, Russia lit them up for 11 hours of continuous strikes on 30+ residential areas, multiple large high rises are fully collapsed, they are downplaying the true casualty figure, its in the high triple digits
 
so in other news, Kiev got lit the fuck UP the other night
https://youtube.com/watch?v=lGBs-KCu3OU
both sides are intentionally targeting civilian residential high rise apartments with intent to collapse the buildings with all occupants, dont believe the bullshiters, Ive watched this thing from the very first days, THIS IS A BIG ESCALATION, both sides took efforts up to this point to TRY to avoid conspicuously civilian residential for half a dozen militarily sound principles

but that attack from Ukraine into Moscow COMBINED with the extreme failure of the Pantsir missile defense system resulting in multiple blue on blue strikes. The most well known as seen one was that crazy video of the massive oil storage tank "blowing its top", that was a Russian air defense missile going astray has made this escalate into a new level
https://youtube.com/watch?v=pLe40hxVqWs
so within all of that attacks FOR SOME REASON, Kiev decided it was a good time to start striking high rises and we arent sure yet if that was intentional or not but the gloves seem to be off now, Russia lit them up for 11 hours of continuous strikes on 30+ residential areas, multiple large high rises are fully collapsed, they are downplaying the true casualty figure, its in the high triple digits
Nice. Maybe put this in one of the designated quarantine threads as repeated ad nauseum, though.
 
so in other news, Kiev got lit the fuck UP the other night
https://youtube.com/watch?v=lGBs-KCu3OU
both sides are intentionally targeting civilian residential high rise apartments with intent to collapse the buildings with all occupants, dont believe the bullshiters, Ive watched this thing from the very first days, THIS IS A BIG ESCALATION, both sides took efforts up to this point to TRY to avoid conspicuously civilian residential for half a dozen militarily sound principles

but that attack from Ukraine into Moscow COMBINED with the extreme failure of the Pantsir missile defense system resulting in multiple blue on blue strikes. The most well known as seen one was that crazy video of the massive oil storage tank "blowing its top", that was a Russian air defense missile going astray has made this escalate into a new level
https://youtube.com/watch?v=pLe40hxVqWs
so within all of that attacks FOR SOME REASON, Kiev decided it was a good time to start striking high rises and we arent sure yet if that was intentional or not but the gloves seem to be off now, Russia lit them up for 11 hours of continuous strikes on 30+ residential areas, multiple large high rises are fully collapsed, they are downplaying the true casualty figure, its in the high triple digits

This is all advertising for american arms manufacturers.
 
Define strict Christianity. West Rome fell and it was hardly whatever your definition of pure Christianity would be, which I assume is some caricature of progressive modern American east-coast Protestantism.

How do you factor in the correlation between modern secularization in Western nations and everything becoming gayer, browner, and shittier? Is that Christianity at work?
"That wasn't real Christianity, real Christianity was the Holy Roman Empire"

This sounds a lot like the classic "that wasn't real communism, China still exists therefore it's real communism"

China as gone through "modern secularization" and you do not see it getting gayer, browner, and shittier.
Only in here in historically Christian nations is that happening.
The reason why that is is because like "communism" in China became "conservative" and in general changed it into a functioning system, Christianity did the same thing in the past and became "conservative" in a way it never was to begin with.
This is how Christianity became a "conservative" ideology when it didn't start out as such, so the new shitlibbery that pops up will naturally go against Christianity and try to destroy it much like how the first Christians tried to destroy the Paganism in the Roman Empire when the Pagans were the conservatives of their time.

This is the same reason why Chinese conservatives are often communist boomers.
And they have nothing nice to say about western shitlibs, we all know about how they refer to them as Baizuos and make fun of them a lot.
They may be communist in name but far from being gay, brown and shitty in general.

These Chinese Communists are arguably even more "conservative" than even many Western Christians nowadays.
And if there were a shitlib movement starting in China in masse, they would associate Communism with "conservatism" and want to destroy it.
Meanwhile the Chinese Conservatives would want to try to "conserve" the "traditional Marxist values" that kept China great for all these years.

And there would be people in the future in China like you lamenting "The fall of Communism" that "kept China great" and would say that China becoming gayer, browner and shittier is "proof" that abandoning Communism is what creates disasters, not adopting it and asking if it the fall of China was Communism at work.

Define strict Christianity
I would something like giving up your food and money to the poor, not having nation states because "we are all fallen brothers in Christ" and letting criminals run free because they let Christ in their heart.
West Rome fell and it was hardly whatever your definition of pure Christianity would be
It fell because it was precisely the definition of pure Christianity, same way how the Soviet Union fell because it was precisely the definition of pure Communism
progressive modern American east-coast Protestantism.
Correct, basically like the biggest and most popular sect of Christianity.
What's wokism in this particular argument?
Belief in complete blank slatism.
Like there being no biological differences in sexes or demographics.
China is infamous for surviving in spite of and in large part by ditching Communism, as many an online tankie has lamented
Dunno, from what we see, lots of Tankies like Hasan love and worship China and use it as an example for why socialism "works"
said online tankies like to denounce as 'state capitalism' in order to not die.
No, they often praise them and use them as examples of how "communism works" and often state that other communist states that fell were "not real communism"
This was absolutely not the case for the Byzantines, to whom Christianity remained a key pillar of their society & thought from start to bitter finish. Nobody, not even the Latin Catholics post-Great Schism, ever seriously argued that they weren't actual Christians.
this assumption that the people of old didn't actually believe in their religion because that kind of fervent religiosity seems so alien to the modern mindset & the society we (assuming nobody on KF is posting from, let's say, Uganda or the Vatican) live in that we can't really grasp it, and/or we project (subconsciously or consciously) our own mindset onto the people living back then.
I have never said that the Christians of those era didn't believe in Christianity, I said that they simply rejected the bad parts of Christianity and reformed it to a functional working system to create functional working society.
Do you really think every Communist in China doesn't genuinely believe in Communism or some aspects of it. Like you, they simply believe that they are the "good communists" meanwhile the true communists that led to the destructions of nations are the "bad communists"

Believing in something doesn't make you some special authority in said thing nor does it mean that you adhere to it strictly.
You can be a believer in "socialism" but the version that isn't really socialist and actually works and apply it to real life and not have it collapse nations.

There's also no reason to assume that most medieval nobles just went around raping & killing everyone and generally living like Game of Thrones characters, they generally at least tried to live by the virtues of the Christian church (which incidentally proved quite conducive to having a functioning society).
If the Christian Church truly adhered to Christian values, they would be letting rapists and killers go free as long as "they accepted Christ in their hearts."
They didn't do that, going against Christian values and able to create functioning societies.
Christianity is that all humans are fallen, it's expected for everyone to fuck up
And you see here? This is exactly the proof and reason why Christianity at it's core was a shitlib religion.
Basically, if you murder people, you can be "forgiven" as long as you genuinely turn to Christ.

A true Christian would advocate for murderers to be released if they turned their life around and repented if they wanted the Government to work like Christian Doctrine says.
t is pretty rare to find a medieval noble who was totally content with dying in sin & not even trying to repent for any of the crazy shit they may or may not have done,
Whether Medieval Nobles believed or didn't believe in a God or Jesus existing is irrelevant, what matters is how much their societies did didn't function in accordance to Christian values.
 
"Wokism didn't bring about the Covid plague and economic downward spiral, nor did it bring the Great Depression, or the Great Recession, nor did it make the value of the US Dollar go down or make gas prices go up, nor did it make big tech corporations become bigger and lead to mass surveillance."

"So much evidence points to everything but wokism contributing. I don't know how much a primarily civic-based, elite-based college system would do when society was falling apart at the seams"
1000015550.png
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole