Actually though. He got big name actors at the time to show up for it, like the J Johna Jameson guy. The world needs more people like Boll. His own government doesn't know how to handle him, and they're German autists with all the rules in sundry
The legal system hates loopholes like the baby tourism thing. I get it that Obama wanted a bunch of American citizens in China but that backfired.
if they restrict it to legals only
This is the minimum I'll hope for - and certainly want much more than that in citizenship restriction, of course - but is in many ways the sensible bar to cross in the first place. I'd be fine with "settling" for this and yet in terms of actual action and policies over the next couple decades, see such a massive jump in both real numbers and percentage of Heritage Americans within the population, that it seems ludicrous we had such a demographic bottleneck that we had to define citizenship requirements and debate immigration policy at all.
Most people in this thread are taking extra doses of copium because they know deep down exactly how SCOTUS will rule and what will follow.
I'm going all in onRunning a quick poll on birthright citizenship.
if they punt it back to Congress
My money’s on
ETA: don’t chimp at me for engagement baiting, jannies
. Why?
Downgrading your expectations from mass suicides, huh? Maybe we’ll get a middling ruling instead of a great one.
Trump's enemies always talk about him the same way an insecure teenage girl talks about a classmate who's prettier and more popular than her.
How funny would it be if the SC just says yes the President can issue Executive Orders and leave it at that.
yeah i wouldnt count on blue states taking hits.
for tomorrow, and some other stuff. 
) The shit about KOSA and all this NIGHTMARE NIGHTMARE NIGHTMARE tech stuff is not passing. Trump has kept saying, firmly, he isn't signing fucking shit until they do the SAVE ACT. If he lets up, he loses all leverage.
There is more than enough evidence to indicate that a loss will lead to the exact opposite outcome. The MAGA crowd will lose all drive to vote because America's future is already set in stone and there is nothing that can be done to change it.
For an alleged proggressive, you doompost like a groyper accelerationist.
*pushes my chips forward*
I wouldn't let the UCCB speak for all US Catholics. The UCCB and many bishops in Blue/Purple areas are pozzed and constantly parrot liberal talking points even when there's enough conservative church-goers who don't and won't buy into it. That won't stop the bishops from trying to indoctrinate their congregations. I think someone else mentioned that as the conservative generation of bishops retire or die off, successors become gradually more liberal.
Dems don't want anything temporary to even end even if they insist certain programs or items are only temporary. Locally, a "temporary" police millage was enacted during the housing crash to make up for lost funding from declining house values. House sales have since rebounded but supporters of the millage still want it renewed with rubber stamp approval from the voters.
This isn't surprising. The mailbox rule exists for filing tax returns where the postmark date determines the timeliness of the filing. I think the bigger issue comes with what states due in terms of ballots being mailed on or before Election day and being received well after that for whatever reason. A five business day cutoff seems reasonable on the surface to meet any certification deadlines, but I imagine localities with a tendency for election shenanigans will want to delay certifications to count all those straggling ballots that mysteriously appear at the 11th hour. I see that as the biggest issue with having a mailbox rule apply to mail-in ballots.