US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
LOL

Wyświetl załącznik 9209438

I wonder why Tucker is meeting Bout now:

Wyświetl załącznik 9209441
Wyświetl załącznik 9209443
Wyświetl załącznik 9209444
Wyświetl załącznik 9209448
Wyświetl załącznik 9209451
Wyświetl załącznik 9209458

Putin must be shitting himself as he activates Bout and brings him away from his normal job:

Wyświetl załącznik 9209428

Note the stupid threat here:

Wyświetl załącznik 9209463

Russia can't even take Kyiv and they're warning about war spilling into the cities that Americans visit? Putin will be raped if he even touches Estonia and he's warning about popular Western cities?

Victor Bout was convicted of targeting Americans in foreign countries and now is arguing that Americans in foreign countries are in danger because xyz?


Wyświetl załącznik 9209473

Tucker is pathetic and should kill himself for being a traitor.
Ah yes, the nation that's in year 4 of the 3-day special military operation will cause Europe to go to war.
 
No I don't, human life is sacred and irreplaceable.
What about niggers? They're retarded, violent pavement apes who regularly assault and kill white people.

What about pajeets? They're sex pest rapist scammers who formulated a shitty caste system and prize deceit as a virtue.

What about Muslims? They too are violent rape apes that prize deceit as a virtue, abuse children and have a practice of committing cousin incest to produce tard babies with short and unfulfilling lives.

What about pedophiles? I don't think I need to explain why they need to be rendered extinct.

All the above are people who regularly disrespect the sanctity of life either by taking it with force or selfishly reducing the quality of it for terrible, evil or stupid reasons.
 
What about niggers? They're retarded, violent pavement apes who regularly assault and kill white people.

What about pajeets? They're sex pest rapist scammers who formulated a shitty caste system and prize deceit as a virtue.

What about Muslims? They too are violent rape apes that prize deceit as a virtue, abuse children and have a practice of committing cousin incest to produce tard babies with short and unfulfilling lives.

What about pedophiles? I don't think I need to explain why they need to be rendered extinct.

All the above are people who regularly disrespect the sanctity of life either by taking it with force or selfishly reducing the quality of it for terrible, evil or stupid reasons.
When Roe V Wade was passed America was 87% white, we weren't mass aborting jeets and Muslims in 1973 dude.

It's fine if you like abortion and want infinity abortions forever but for the love of God man please argue your case better for why the U.S needs to become Moloch's fleshlight.
 
1782782476132.png


Los Angeles apparently celebrates a "World Naked Bike Ride Day"
Its not an LGBT things its "Against Car Culture"
Although as you can see, its mostly men doing it.
And some guy got arrested and charged with:
Assault with a Deadly Weapon.
According to 2024 LAPD End-Year Crime Statistics, the violent crime rate of Los Angeles is 97% higher than the national average.

That is to say, close to TWICE the national average rate of violent crime.
But the cops are focusing on the nude bicyclists being harassed.
 
I think you're probably right, or at the very least I'm with you in not holding my breath for the current court to undo birthright citizenship. However, I have a different view on the legal merits: namely I am really biased so it's easy for me to just ignore any evidence that the drafters of the 14th amendment intended it to create the legal reality of birthright citizenship as it is understood now, or that the language makes such a reading inescapable. But more importantly, the evidence of Roe v Wade demonstrates that the Supreme Court can just rule completely retarded nonsense in pursuit of some policy goal, and that is what I would like to have happen. The idea that the Congress might resolve the legal issues in question, especially by the passage of an amendment to the Constitution, is honestly orders of magnitude more absurd than the idea that the Supreme Court ought to just make what is good happen by writing down a bunch of legal words and then saying that whoever is the president can do whatever was the unconstitutional thing he wanted to do. The Senate would, in fact, be a crucial part of this plan, because they will rubber stamp the "conservative" hack justices who write these stupid opinions that allow us to stop being fucking retarded and disenfranchise, expropriate, and depopulate brown invaders.
I don't see that this Court will necessarily have the same activist appetite that some Courts have had, especially for something that is not specifically galvanizing the populus and is a long-held, broadly understood and agreed principle. ...Maybe!

But what do you mean about the Senate rubber-stamping the Supreme Court? The Court doesn't need the Senate for anything. Do you mean that a favorable SCt decision would set the stage for a Constitutional amendment? That would require all of Congress, not just the Senate.

I think the language is straightforward, but I also think that the reality of the day may mean that it might be preferential to tweak the principle. But the language and precedent are a high hurdle. And the reality is that procedurally, absent a compelling reason for the Court to up-end a century of settled decision - and Sauer hasn't offered a particularly compelling legal argument for upending it (his argument is fairly technical) / the Court is unlikely to take action that is better made by the legislative branch. They might craft language to open the door incrementally for future decisions to go the next step, or to encourage legislative action. But I don't see this case as a case for a dramatic shift in itself.
 
What about niggers? They're retarded, violent pavement apes who regularly assault and kill white people.

What about pajeets? They're sex pest rapist scammers who formulated a shitty caste system and prize deceit as a virtue.

What about Muslims? They too are violent rape apes that prize deceit as a virtue, abuse children and have a practice of committing cousin incest to produce tard babies with short and unfulfilling lives.

What about pedophiles? I don't think I need to explain why they need to be rendered extinct.

All the above are people who regularly disrespect the sanctity of life either by taking it with force or selfishly reducing the quality of it for terrible, evil or stupid reasons.
"I will not allow my principles to be used against me by people who do not believe in them," is one of the most powerful changes I ever decided to make. I recommend it.

There's a reason the bible says "Thou shalt not murder." Exodus 20:13.

The sanctity of life is only present in those who respect it in kind.
 
Since women's lib universally has resulted in the cratering of birthrates, devolution of the family structure, and ticking time bomb economically for every society across the globe and throughout history that has tried it, I'm not sure if the proven juice is worth the squeeze from choices women make when they get to be sovereign.
Have you ever talked to a woman about her "problems"? Propose a solution and they get mad, we probably shouldn't have a group of people whose response to problems is to constantly complain but do nothing in charge of problem solving. This is why potholes get complained about but never filled and when some random citizen does fill them they get arrested/fined.
 
But what do you mean about the Senate rubber-stamping the Supreme Court?
I'm saying I agree with you about the current court; my point is that the most straightforward path is getting partisan hacks onto the court to rule how you want, in this case to rule that only citizens can birth/conceive American citizens. Again with the Roe v Wade example, some people have said that because it wasn't a very strong (in terms of the legal merits) ruling, that made it vulnerable, and eventually it was overturned; however, it stood for 50 years, and not only was the legal water in which people had to swim in their activism for or against abortion, it massively shaped public perceptions through that period. I'm not saying that's good or bad, in fact as someone who's somewhat ambivalent on the issue my own opinion is mostly just "it wasn't a good ruling", and I'm fine with not having a policy at the federal level. The lesson though is that when it comes to getting something done, this is the route to power and, depressingly, even getting people on your side of the issue, or at least setting the null hypothesis of where the divide of for/against the issue even starts. Good decision or not, sometimes you have to just go ahead and win.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 9210547

Los Angeles apparently celebrates a "World Naked Bike Ride Day"
Its not an LGBT things its "Against Car Culture"
Although as you can see, its mostly men doing it.
And some guy got arrested and charged with:
Assault with a Deadly Weapon.
According to 2024 LAPD End-Year Crime Statistics, the violent crime rate of Los Angeles is 97% higher than the national average.

That is to say, close to TWICE the national average rate of violent crime.
But the cops are focusing on the nude bicyclists being harassed.
I think it makes it worse with the fact that they are all overweight or old. That’s just plain disgusting for all onlookers. (Them being naked is already bad enough) It being in LA makes a lot of sense.

I hope one of them has an accident where they fall off the bike and their penis gets run over by the other bikes.
 
"I will not allow my principles to be used against me by people who do not believe in them," is one of the most powerful changes I ever decided to make. I recommend it.
The corollary of this is that you also don't let other people fall for that trick. False Biblical cuckservatives are a massive headache.
 
When Roe V Wade was passed America was 87% white, we weren't mass aborting jeets and Muslims in 1973 dude.

It's fine if you like abortion and want infinity abortions forever but for the love of God man please argue your case better for why the U.S needs to become Moloch's fleshlight.
Roe V Wade was passed because a bunch of hippie boomers took the free love shit a little too far, and didn't want to be responsible for the meth fueled orgies and resulting children that were stopping them from doing as many drugs as possible. That's it.
 
Roe V Wade is one of the other death knells of anyone pretending the Supreme Court has any integrity.

Surely they can find a penumbra that emanates a proclamation to ban birthright citizenship. Everything else is nonsense; there is only power.
 
Roe V Wade was passed because a bunch of hippie boomers took the free love shit a little too far, and didn't want to be responsible for the meth fueled orgies and resulting children that were stopping them from doing as many drugs as possible. That's it.
Despite being theologically and morally opposed to abortion I am perfectly fine with people arguing their case.

I just expect that argument to be better than "because wymins rights! Checkmate incel!"
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole