I'm not quite sure what you're saying here. A rational population would recognize the good and bad and neglect the bad, either by ignoring the products of a bad private business (Buzzfeed as a random example) or electing an alternate candidate for public office. People still have an option to choose. In the private sector a business that makes poor decisions should go out of business. An elected official that makes bad decisions should not be reelected.
Uh, duh?
And in the private sector, if you hire someone who makes bad decisions at your company routinely, YOU are the one who is removed, and potentially regulation is put in place for who you can hire to that position. I can't remove the voting population of America from making bad voting decisions. What I can advocate for is a pool of people who make BETTER decisions for the country, on average.
why do you think fatpacks is so scared? he's gonna have his /r/fuckingfascists habit exposed
No I'm not pretending. You said that when people see Jews in power making bad decisions, then those people when they're put into power will say that all Jews should be allowed to participate. Had to re-read what you wrote five times because it's structured weirdly, and it still has a possible second meaning of Jews putting themselves ahead of others.
All he has to do is determine what counts as being subject.
There is a difference between subject the noun and subject the verb. I am a subject of the United States, I am subject to the laws of Taiwan because I live in their jurisdiction, but I am not a subject of Taiwan. Same logic to why natives were exempt dispite being subject to US legal jurisdiction they were recognized as being subjects of their own tribal nations rather than the US.
I would be cool with this. If you got your green card and on path for naturalization then I would count you as a subject of the US. Odds are those ones are also married to a citizen so their kids would get citizenship anyway. It's illegals, tourists, and temporary workers we need to really exempt from BRC
He does something even better. He lives in an RV and travels through Trump Country, making sure that the closest leftist is hundreds of miles away.
I think you're probably right, or at the very least I'm with you in not holding my breath for the current court to undo birthright citizenship. However, I have a different view on the legal merits: namely I am really biased so it's easy for me to just ignore any evidence that the drafters of the 14th amendment intended it to create the legal reality of birthright citizenship as it is understood now, or that the language makes such a reading inescapable. But more importantly, the evidence of Roe v Wade demonstrates that the Supreme Court can just rule completely retarded nonsense in pursuit of some policy goal, and that is what I would like to have happen. The idea that the Congress might resolve the legal issues in question, especially by the passage of an amendment to the Constitution, is honestly orders of magnitude more absurd than the idea that the Supreme Court ought to just make what is good happen by writing down a bunch of legal words and then saying that whoever is the president can do whatever was the unconstitutional thing he wanted to do. The Senate would, in fact, be a crucial part of this plan, because they will rubber stamp the "conservative" hack justices who write these stupid opinions that allow us to stop being fucking retarded and disenfranchise, expropriate, and depopulate brown invaders.
There's one part you're missing.
The KIDS Act creates a special team appointed by the Secretary of Commerce to regulate the internet and dictate what websites are "too dangerous" for children. This will not just apply to porn websites. The second a Democrat gets in office they will absolutely use this to rape us all to death. Any and all wrongthink against globohomo will cease to exist online.
Honestly if women didn’t consistently make executive decisions affecting people’s lives and the future of the nation solely on if those decisions lead to their demihuman rape fantasies, it would be a lot easier to justify the power and freedom they are given. But as it stands, we are perpetually at risk of a scenario where society collapses and we will have to choose between woman’s rights and being able to live another day.
It also led to countries where women get raped regularly by violent browns and eventually will be excluded from the workforce again and forced to wear hijabs. Checkmate, testicle havers!
Lol I look forward to the 10% male population that finally breaks and tell every childless women over the age of 40 "You are a nun now".
I didn't want to read this bloated bill but now I have no choice but to see just how deeply Congress is going to fuck my liberties in the ass.
massie getting gaddafied by the far leftists he catered to would be fucking hilarious
Well in that case I will be against it and argue that it doesn't abide by the very first part of this list, which talks about how to get your website censored, you need to have at least 1/3rd of your content be pornographic in nature, and for that to be a known purpose of the website.
So he's headed to Chicago?
Europe needs to implement common sense heat control
That's unironically the best part - even if we lose the war and succumb to infinity brownoid invasion, the women who helped facilitate it will get to live out their fetish novel handmaids tale but instead of some white guy who doesn't let her whore outside of the marriage it will be an abusive muslim named Abdul who beats them every time they dont wear a hijab. Even if the people who have betrayed our nation win and get what they want, they are still importing one of the most backwards and retarded cultures in the history of our planet by the masses and empowering them.
