God awaits your arrival, Mr. Singham. It will be an interaction no amount of chink "loyalty" will help you with.
If it's yellow, watch that fellow.
Felons are a chunk of the population, and through stupid decisions, have lost the right to vote. Illegals are a chunk of the population, and they don't have the right to vote.
I agree, but in your example we are restricting rights for those specific individuals who engaged in those actions. I was under the impression the original person I was replying to was referring to broadly all women should have less rights (Or at least questioning why feminism was a thing at all and stuff). Removing rights as a punishment for individual actions is leagues different then taking the actions of some and applying it to others.
Just alright? Baby, it's outta sight!
Asking Roberts or ACB to rule against the literal text of the 14th is a step too far. The best we can hope for is that they qualify the wong kim ark decision with something like "yeah for people here legally" or possibly "yeah for people here on permanent residency" but that's a major stretch.
It has never been more over. This site isn't making it past 2026.kids act passed house onto the senate
When you get older you realize that women think very differently to men on certain things, but particularly defense in general is something that women are generally clueless about to the extent that it makes me believe they shouldn't have a say in our national security.
That's not fair at all. Men had rights first, women can have lefts instead.
Fortunately it's DOA in the Senate because they don't like the House version. Senate version is dead because the House don't like it. Not happy it'll come down to that, but we'll be safe for now.
its part of the devil deal
Find a source thats not a Jewish whore that tried killing this website
Natural equality (life, liberty, happiness/property) is right and because women are property owners and citizens of the United States, they should have a stake in its legislation and future. The modern sociological problems surrounding feminism are moral rather than institutional. Building a sound moral foundation will result in success, regardless of the environment or what it enables. The problem are those that attempt to undermine the foundation.
The future of a nation-state is more important than any individual one of us, and if a certain group of individuals, let's use a different example here and say, Jews, are in positions of power and using those positions of power to make bad decisions consistently, you should not be surprised when people who see the group making bad decisions when they are put into power saying that the people from that group, even if innocent or non-problematic people get swept up, should be allowed to participate in the power-holding process.
shes not jewish somehow
Rare good post from @Fatpacks as well.
And she's quoting The Hill
