US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Not to the scale as general infinitary rushes. You have Napoleon and so forth that used them, but give me some links to more than a few battles where land based gunpowder based artillery were a primary factor pre 1900s. Much less entire wars.
Every siege from ~1400 onward in Europe was heavily decided by artillery. Much of early modern warfare in europe was decided more by sieges than pitched field battles, especially conflicts such as the 80 years war, the war of Spanish Succession, and the endless campaigns between the turks and the europeans in the Balkans.
 
Every siege from ~1400 onward in Europe was heavily decided by artillery. Much of early modern warfare in europe was decided more by sieges than pitched field battles, especially conflicts such as the 80 years war, the war of Spanish Succession, and the endless campaigns between the turks and the europeans in the Balkans.
Ok I gave up on my original hard statement on that lol. I didn't mean it wasn't a major thing, I was trying to compare to chinese era rockets. In the end I failed to convey my main point which Ugly one said was breached loaded exploding shells. I know cannons are were a big thing, but I was more thinking of just canons and beating down walls and so on, not terribly effective in lined up battle fronts like Waterloo. I appreciate the corrections to everyone, honestly. My field artillery history isn't the best, but my small arms and naval is somewhat more focused. I'm glad to learn more about all this.
 
Trump: ‘There would be no Israel’ without me
President Trump said on Tuesday that there “would be no Israel” without him, marking some of his most pointed criticism toward the country amid its ongoing attacks on Lebanon.

“Without the US, there would be no Israel. Without me, there would be no Israel because no other president was willing to do what I did. I have had a great relationship with Bibi. Now Bibi has to be more responsible with respect to Lebanon,” Trump said, speaking at the G7 in Évian-les-Bains, France.

Trump’s frustrations with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have risen amid Israel’s insistence on striking Lebanon in an effort to target the Iranian-backed militant group Hezbollah despite the ongoing peace negotiations between Washington and Tehran.

The prime minister said on Monday that Israel will keep its troops in Lebanon despite the preliminary deal, noting “the struggle has not ended.”

“I want to make clear: We will remain in the security zones as long as required in order to defend our country,” the prime minister said.

Israel conducted an airstrike in a suburb of Beirut on Sunday as Trump announced a deal with Iran would be signed electronically that day. The Israeli military said the strike was in response to the militant group firing three projectiles into northern Israel.

Trump lashed out at Netanyahu in an interview with Axios following the strike.

“Why did Bibi have to do a f‑‑‑ing attack?” Trump told the outlet on Sunday. “I was so p‑‑‑ed off. I let him know. He has no f‑‑‑ing judgment. I let him know that.”
Just something that popped up for me on tiktok, of all places. From earlier today.
The tiktok link:
Archive:
 
I wasn't going to contribute to the cannonsperging and I am not a chinese history expert but as far as I understand;

China continued to make cannons bigger and bigger as time went on; thus forts and cities had larger and thicker walls. This demand for extremely large and thick walls made the already inflexible Chinese doctrines even less flexible as the logistics of moving such large amount of material for longterm entrenchments meant it just made sense to turn nearly every fortress into a settlement and thus it was more self-sustaining.

I'm not going to sit here and effortpost about this of all things but I'm sure many of you intelligent gentlemen can infer the knock on effect that this would have on warfare and chinese logistic incentives.


This is building up into another "They dont know what the fuck they are doing" isnt it?
Thank god.
 
Way late but Check out Disaffected on YouTube.

Josh Slocum’s hypothesis for his entire show for the past 5 years has been about how our society is now run by Cluster B and woke is the full manifestation of it.

He’s shadow banned to hell but puts out a great weekly show relating back to that.
https://x.com/JDHaltigan if you want someone with a PhD in this saying essentially the same thing.
 
LMAO Hasan is so mindbroken he's devolved into BMJ hitting the Damn That Pussy Nice! insults
He's already got the chair reactions and roids to be both nontent and a junkie; so now all he needs is a gambling sponsorship (like the fake Muslim he is) to complete his metamorphosis into the cockroach version of BMJ
It would be an improvement over his current content for sure; and probably would get less people killed!
 
Another one, the Siege of Yorktown was won by artillery. Getting French siege guns into place decided the battle. According to the accounts we had, the French command explained exactly how the battle would go if and when they got their guns into place, and it played out as expected.
The American artillery there as well had fun competing with the French about who's gunnery was better.
 
dude Japanese people here for the world cup on twitter is fucking gold!

they are getting their whole world view shaken up
1781648576256.png

then he goes and gets mexican food and can barley understand the sheer generosity of a single bowl of free chips and salsa
1781648732902.png
 
I think you over estimate how pro Muslim tucker et al are.
He literally went on a rant about how 'based' sharia was. Wtf are you talking about?
so this thread is now pro canceling if its yids and not nigs? really? my expectations if jews arent a malicious cabal that will ruin you for any opposition would be for jews to not immediately work together including with the us government to ruin one kid for a single comment. no one here should have said nigger then, it was unprofessional and rude, and you should all be ruined for it.
He literally decried a jew with his full name when he could have simply ignored him.What did he think would happen? You can be against cancvellation all you want, but i would ask you, if you screamed a slur at work, what would happen next?
 
He literally decried a jew with his full name when he could have simply ignored him.What did he think would happen? You can be against cancvellation all you want, but i would ask you, if you screamed a slur at work, what would happen next?
People often confuse political correctness and simply not being a sperg in public. Many such cases.

You can be tastefully antisemitic, but going YEAH I DON'T WANNA WORK FOR A JEW ANYWAY, JEWY MCJEWERSON is just gonna make you look like a troglodyte with no self-control.
 
He literally went on a rant about how 'based' sharia was. Wtf are you talking about?

I've kept up with the majority of his shows for the past few years, I would have remembered that. He did glaze how safe Qatar was and how nice people were, and he said Lebanon was beautiful full of Christians and so on. He had a phase where he was getting mad at Randy Fine for saying no muslims in congress too which was weird.
 
You can be tastefully antisemitic, but going YEAH I DON'T WANNA WORK FOR A JEW ANYWAY, JEWY MCJEWERSON is just gonna make you look like a troglodyte with no self-control.
HoI4 and its consequences have been an unmitigated disaster for autistic young men.
I've heard the theories that part of why he choosed this execution method specifically is because he was a victim of Bacha bazi when he was a hostage of the Ottomans.
His brother also sided with the Sultan against him instead of joining him to avenge their father. At the very least he had a lot of anger to work through, and he started with the countrymen that betrayed his father.
 
Ohh figured yall would like this to, some protesters got sprayed
https://youtube.com/watch?v=SXMnhnnuqLQ
a story in a few frames
Wyświetl załącznik 9154280Wyświetl załącznik 9154277Wyświetl załącznik 9154281

womp womp
"Say it loud and say it clear, immigrants are welcome here."

Yes. The ones who go through the immigration process are, in fact, welcome. That's not who's being deported, you fat retards. Once again, a 90% white group too. Fucking morons. Glad to see you posting fun stuff again Stud.
 
Honestly I thought it was cute lol, it's not like they wore the verse that called homosexuality a sin. I even thought it was pro-LGBT, not anti?
The reference is to what the rainbow means in the Bible: a promise from God to never flood the world again. There are a few possible explanations for the brouhahah:
  1. They know it means nothing and are trying to find a problem where none exists.
  2. They believe the rainbow is theirs and hate anyone stating otherwise.
  3. They are such special snowflakes that anything not explicitly referring to them upsets them.
  4. They are such demoniacs that any reference to the Word of God, no matter how innocuous, upsets them.
  5. All of the above.
Take your pick.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole