💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Ralph is capable of and has done monstrous things but he has at times displayed remorse about the things he's done. He is incapable of not handing the wheel to his dark passenger, making things worse and causing him to double down as an ego defense mechanism like the WWE taught him. Nick lacks the ability to feel bad for doing bad things and in fact relishes in it. His only remorse is for getting caught. There is no separation between Nick's worst impluses and Nick's everyday self.
If I had to spend a week living with either Nick or Ralph, it would be Ralph every single time. If I had to leave my child (especially a daughter) with either Nick or Ralph for a day, it would be Ralph every single time. I know Ralph won't coke up my kid, and I don't believe Ralph would try to molest them either.

Ralph has shown vulnerability and that he's human multiple times. He's not a good person, but he is a person and I think there's a 1 in a million chance he could change for the better. Nick is subhuman and only ever put on the act of being a good guy. There's zero chance he ever changes for the better.
 
They were only allowed to use phones during breaks. Even Nick probably wouldn't do it sititng right in front of the judge.

---
Aaron just did a bit that might provoke a minor meltdown: first he talks about how he never hit April but he should have; then he says that April accused both her ex and Nick of abusing her: "I don't think Rekieta would look at April with so much reverence if he knew that she accused him of hitting her too... like she accused him of all kinds of abuse... don't ask me how I know, that would break his heart.... It's kind of like the Israel thing, if you get hit by 109 boyfriends..."
I can easily see April still talking to Aaron. I doubt every night for hours on end but they are both much more normative than for example Rekieta so it wouldn't have to be absurdly weird to occasionally shoot the breeze.
Keanu also did that whole bit with April accusing Rekieta of basically imprisoning Ape in the Silent Hill house, keeping her cut off from the internet and so on. If April is saying that is abuse, she's quite right.
But more importantly Aaron even saying this kind of thing is going to trigger superfag Rekieta so that's awesome.
 
I can easily see April still talking to Aaron. I doubt every night for hours on end but they are both much more normative than for example Rekieta so it wouldn't have to be absurdly weird to occasionally shoot the breeze.
Keanu also did that whole bit with April accusing Rekieta of basically imprisoning Ape in the Silent Hill house, keeping her cut off from the internet and so on. If April is saying that is abuse, she's quite right.
But more importantly Aaron even saying this kind of thing is going to trigger superfag Rekieta so that's awesome.
Nick claims he loves April and respects her decision to move on, but he always seems to bring her up over and over.
 
Nick claims he loves April and respects her decision to move on, but he always seems to bring her up and drag her back into the drama
I know April and Keanu and April and Aaron and then Aaron and Keanu (but never the three at the same fucking time that would be too normal) all had the same theory about Rekieta being the ultimate manchild control freak. No one is ever allowed to leave the circus, no one is ever allowed to have private moments, private thoughts or secrets. Except Rekieta, of course.
 
Ralph has shown vulnerability and that he's human multiple times. He's not a good person, but he is a person and I think there's a 1 in a million chance he could change for the better. Nick is subhuman and only ever put on the act of being a good guy. There's zero chance he ever changes for the better
Ralph has some kind of BPD or similar; he isn't a good person, but he is handleable and does seem to feel bad for the things he does. His main issue is basically that life is just too much for him and it leads him to extreme substance abuse.

Nick is just a literal psycho who does nothing but thrill seek 24/7. He's zooted all the time because being sober is too boring for him and he's admitted that one of his favorite thrills is to make people uncomfortable.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
But more importantly Aaron even saying this kind of thing is going to trigger superfag Rekieta so that's awesome.
Both these faggots need to keep April's name out of their mouths.

I have a little (very little) respect for April, because of all the borderline shitheads in this trainwreck, at least she has disappeared and stayed off social media. Now it may well be that her latest daddy boyfriend/husband is Amish or has strictly forbad it, but for whatever reason she seems to want NOTHING to do with any of these losers. Now if she just stops monkeybranching from asshole to asshole, maybe she will be able to salvage whatever human dignity she has left and live a peaceful life. Meh. I'm an optimist by nature. Seven years of KF has not broken me...yet.
 
Now it may well be that her latest daddy boyfriend/husband is Amish or has strictly forbad it, but for whatever reason she seems to want NOTHING to do with any of these losers.
Nick talks about how much her current boyfriend hates him like it's in a vacuum when it's most likely because April has had some very bad things to say about Nick to him.
 
All right, I admit I laughed, but Aaron is (as usual) a God Damned Retard for saying this stuff in public when he's already the nigger of the Minnesota judicial system for being Bad Divorce Man and Bad Revenge Porn Man.
We were just talking about how Ralph is funnier than Nick, and now we can confidently say that Aaron is funnier than Nick too
 
Nick said that at his sentencing to the judge. I think all it shows is how dumb the people around him are.

Yeah I remember that one from the KC.

I'm not a lawyer, but I took a hard enough look at law school, the debt it incurs, the perils of the field, and enough of my friends who are trapped making way less than their debts owed. And these Sektur types should've had enough unimpressive lawyers in their life to know that: Lawyer ≠ Smart and Lawyer ≠ Rich

And at the risk of white knighting for @Potentially Criminal Nick tried saying Sean was bitch made for ever being a prosecutor *and* tried claiming Sean doesn't know anything about the inside of a courtroom. You can make one of those criticisms, but you can't make both.

For anybody thinking about law, there are 2 books I highly recommend: Con Law and Don't Go To Law School Unless. My biggest takeaways about law school were: 1) Half of all law school graduates never work in law, so either get into nationally ranked law schools, law schools with good reputations in your area, or be the #1 graduate in any of the others. 2) Internships after your first year are crucial and have a cascading effect on future employment. 3) Even the lawyers who find a job may find themselves in dead end places like document review. 4) Some of those who can't find a job or hate document review establish their own firms. These 1-man "firms" are doomed to fail because the person has no rolodex or reputation, so they wind up writing some wills here and there.

So when I first heard about Nick during the Jack Murphy saga, I was suspicious. I had no information on his background (internships, law school, field, etc), but alarms went off when I saw that he has his own firm because younger people really don't usually do that and find sustained work.

I know we all talk about Nick's lack of experience in a courtroom (which isn't that unusual) but how much work has he done that requires a law degree? I'm willing to accept that he works in copyright law; has he ever really had any clients?

Speaking of work, you can't work as a lawyer until you've passed the bar exam. Nick was admitted to the bar on May 8th, 2015. Unless he graduated from law school in January, he must've failed the bar at least once.

TL;DR: Nick didn't build the foundation of a legal career and even the "small law firm" claim is an exaggeration. Until he provides a law school graduation date and an explanation, he failed the bar. And he bought a house, had kids, and survived extended periods of unemployment because of inter generational wealth as opposed to skill or grit.
 
but how much work has he done that requires a law degree? I'm willing to accept that he works in copyright law; has he ever really had any clients?
32 court cases, plus whatever he's done that leaves no easily accessible public records.

 
If I had to spend a week living with either Nick or Ralph,
This is like that joke:

"You're trapped in an elevator with Ralph, Melton and Nick. You have a gun but only....34 rounds of explosive tipped incendiary rounds. ..."

I'm willing to accept that he works in copyright law;
He doesn't work in copyright law or any field (law or other) that requires any kind of specialized knowledge. He is no meaningful experience or education that would qualify him.
 
TL;DR: Nick didn't build the foundation of a legal career and even the "small law firm" claim is an exaggeration. Until he provides a law school graduation date and an explanation, he failed the bar. And he bought a house, had kids, and survived extended periods of unemployment because of inter generational wealth as opposed to skill or grit.
Studying is for NERDS, though. I'm sure he had no problem paying that exam fee for each and every attempt, what with that kind of time and money.
 
4) Some of those who can't find a job or hate document review establish their own firms. These 1-man "firms" are doomed to fail because the person has no rolodex or reputation, so they wind up writing some wills here and there.

So when I first heard about Nick during the Jack Murphy saga, I was suspicious. I had no information on his background (internships, law school, field, etc), but alarms went off when I saw that he has his own firm because younger people really don't usually do that and find sustained work
Nick was in a position where he could have been successful with his own firm. He is in a small market and had a lot of local connections. The only reason that Nick wasn't able to make it on his own is because IRL he apparently has never been particularly good at not coming off as a psycho. He had an offer (free/cheap basement office and overflow work mostly representing low level drug offenders) from the guy who ended up representing montegraph that would have set him up as a successful criminal defense guy, but felt like he was too good for it and burned the bridge before it was even built. That combined with Nick's legendary work ethic killed his firm in the crib.
 
I know we all talk about Nick's lack of experience in a courtroom (which isn't that unusual) but how much work has he done that requires a law degree? I'm willing to accept that he works in copyright law; has he ever really had any clients?
He knows jack about copyright law. He's done some small time criminal work. He's had 28-30 matters in court as attorney of record. Poor record, most done in first 3 years. None made him a living. He claims to have had contract or advisory engagements. I'm comfortable estimating those to be negligible and short-term at best.

Speaking of work, you can't work as a lawyer until you've passed the bar exam. Nick was admitted to the bar on May 8th, 2015. Unless he graduated from law school in January, he must've failed the bar at least once.
Iirc, he was graduated in February 2015.

TL;DR: Nick didn't build the foundation of a legal career and even the "small law firm" claim is an exaggeration.
Well duh. This is long established and documented.
Until he provides a law school graduation date and an explanation, he failed the bar.
Don't think so but even if he did, it's bad but it's about #8 billion on his list of deficits.
 
Nick was in a position where he could have been successful with his own firm. He is in a small market and had a lot of local connections. The only reason that Nick wasn't able to make it on his own is because IRL he apparently has never been particularly good at not coming off as a psycho. He had an offer (free/cheap basement office and overflow work mostly representing low level drug offenders) from the guy who ended up representing montegraph that would have set him up as a successful criminal defense guy, but felt like he was too good for it and burned the bridge before it was even built. That combined with Nick's legendary work ethic killed his firm in the crib.
That's a common theme. Nick will be handed something life-changing for free and then act like he's too good for it and get something far worse instead.

"A stable desk job? Pass! I'd rather be a performative cunt and read atlas shrugged at work instead!"

"A super easy and lucrative law career where I start from the bottom? Nah! I deserve everything right now and shouldn't have to earn my keep!"

"An American dream life with a wife, 5 kids, and a giant house? No thanks! I'd rather invite a coke whore and some nobody radio host into my home for a drug-fueled polycule!"

"An easy job where I stream court cases and earn millions of dollars a year? I don't even have to do any work, I can outsource the actual analysis to other people for free! Nope! I'd rather just talk about my sex life and flirt with cat fishes!"

Nick continuously thinks he's too good for something and is always proven wrong.
 
That's a common theme. Nick will be handed something life-changing for free and then act like he's too good for it and getting nothing instead.

"A stable desk job? Pass! I'd rather be a performative cunt and read atlas shrugged at work instead!"

"A super easy and lucrative law career where I start from the bottom? Nah! I deserve everything right now and shouldn't have to earn my keep!"

"An American dream live with a wife, 5 kids, and giant house? No thanks! I'd rather invite a coke whore and some nobody radio host into a drug-fueled polycule!"

"An easy job where I stream court cases and earn millions of dollars a year? I don't even have to do any work, I can outsource the actual analysis to other people for free! Nope! I'd rather just talk about my sex life and flirt with cat fishes!"

Nick continuously thinks he's too good for something and is always proven wrong.
It’s also working his way up from the bottom, but with the biggest purchase of one’s life, a house, already gifted to him. Not just a house, a huge house. Which should make that journey up so much easier, if one had even an ounce of work ethic.
Although I do wonder if he could have ever built a successful practice - he had connections, yes, but at some point you need to display some modicum of competence
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole