Americans Injured in Iranian Missile Strike on Kuwaiti Air Base
https://www.livemint.com/news/ameri...trike-on-kuwaiti-air-base-11780116518473.html |
Archive
The biggest loser of the conflict is the MQ-9 Reaper. At a price tag of $30 million, the US is going to need to develop far cheaper alternatives. Nearly every mission over Iran guarantees at least one loss. Thats better than loosing an MQ-4 Global Hawk or F-16, but loosing such an expensive assets is not a viable strategy, even for the US. The fucking Houthis managed to take down 7 of these.
The MIC has gotchu fam.
The MQ-Next and the Gambit are already working on being ready for getting attrited, and the MQ-20 is going to take over the high-capacity missions.
But also let me inject some reality here with Pentagon Accounting and how $30 million isn't really $30 million.
When the US Military buys anything: a tank, a plane, a missile, a gun, practically down to the bullet, it buys along with it a support contract. Think the extended warranty at Best Buy - it includes spare parts servicing, maintenance, and for most systems what ammounts to a degree of insurance in terms of replacement cost.
That is, that MQ-9A that got acked cost about 15 million, but the support contract can be folded to a new airframe.
The reason why I said "15 million" and anticipated replacement cost is "30 million" is because the USAF is sending into harm's way MQ-9
A drones, which are end of life and out of production. The MQ-9
B is virtually identical and still in production for international customers and non-military US government customers (CBP & NASA, mostly). The $30 million price tage is based off General Atomic's estimate given to the Airforce and relayed to congress, of what General Atomics would charge the USAF for a fully-kitted MQ-9B right now - so this includes capabilities beyond the MQ-9A (longer range, more payload) plus a "immediacy" charge becasue the USAF would be line-jumping other customers. If the USAF requested a MQ-9B closer in capability to a MQ-9A, the cost would be much less, and capabilities could be reduced to reduce the cost, but exact numbers have not been discussed.
Additionally, the MQ-9A lines have been shut for less than a year and could be brought to service should the DoD deem it necessary.
there are also MQ-9As in the bone yard and other storage facilities that could be returned to service for much less than 30 million.
Mongols were heroes for killing sandniggers and indians, their only mistake was not finishing the job, speaking off, Nontent Donnie still losing izzat to PakisCHAD.
The other thing to take note of is that the Mongols are a rare case of history being written by the defeated.
Ghengis and Ogadai encouraged rumors and stories that painted mongols as blood thirsty demons and monsters, so that the conquered would be too terrified to resist and neighbors would be too terrified of them to fight.
Ghengis was a smart man and preferred trade to war. But if you wouldn't trade with him, he'd murder you, take your territory, and have some one put in charge who would - he had no tolerance for bullshit. And if his caravans were interferred with, you'd best believe something will be done about it. IF you don't, the Great Khan will.