Iran Crisis & the 2026 War between Iran and the United States, Gulf States, and Israel - Please focus on news and coverage, not argumentation.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Wyróżnienie
photo_2026-05-06_08-03-31.jpg
Instructions for passing through the Strait of Hormuz, according to the Persian Gulf Strait Authority:
1. Payment of tolls in Iran's national currency, the Rial.

2. Issuance of guarantees within the Iranian banking system.

3. If a vessel belongs to a country that caused damages to Iran in the recent war, or contributed to causing damages, it must pay reparations before obtaining a passage permit. Countries that have sanctioned Iran or blocked Iran's assets abroad are not allowed passage.

4. The correct name ‘Persian Gulf’ must be written in all documents.

5. Non-compliance with the above will result in seizure of the vessel and a fine equivalent to 20% of the cargo value.

6. All vessels must pass through the designated maritime corridors as specified by Iran, and must comply with instructions of the Iranian Armed Forces.

7. Vessels belonging to the Zionist regime, originating in any of the ports of occupied Palestine (Haifa, Ashdod, Eilat), or heading to any of its ports, are banned from passage through the Strait.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
 
atrocious esteban powiedział(a):
https://youtube.com/watch?v=cnjcu_OD6yc
It's over, Isntreal. I've already drawn Netanyahu as a soyjak. Btw sub to my patreon plssss im a one man operation!!!

Just quickly browsing through the comments, it's the same shit as always in normie spheres. If we're just a puppet state of Israel and only in that war because they say so, then that means we're losing if Israel is, right? I can't archive rn because I'm on my phone (and too retarded to figure out how to smash the video down to below 200mb)
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

GDF is a commie i think. He had a video titled "how the somalians smoked delta force"
 
Heres what i think is happening and why.
In the beginning, the goal was regime change and a revolution, with the shah coming back in power, but by week 3-4, someone (probably Vance) showed trump a picture of Pahlavi smiling in the general direction of Biden. BDS took over and now Trump is desperately trying to instead find anyone in the current regime to be delcy rodriguez, just so he can own biden and libturds or something, but finding someone like that in a theocratic Iran is going to be 100x harder than in corrupt LATAM venezuela - thus he is delaying the process as much as possible.

If you think this is ridiculous, just remember that this is his entire attitude towards Zelensky.

I love the american empire as much as the next guy, but this is getting super gay at this point. even if this ends with every muslim in the world exploding, giving this many talking points to browns is already embarrassing.
 
ThisIsGonnaBeGood powiedział(a):
Can India just nuke Pakistan please?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Trump bailed Pakistan out the last time it was getting its shit pushed in by India because he thought it would increase his chances of winning the nobel peace prize (for supposedly preventing a nuclear war). That, and the Pak field marshal Asim Munir has likely figured out that you can get Trump to do pretty much anything you want as long as you stroke his ego and give him good enough head. And he's has been doing just that ever since. Pakistan even expressed willingness to nominate Trump for the prize. I don't see any other reason the US would turn to goatfuckistan of all places to act as a mediator, but that's just my armchair analysis.

1778071120077.png
 
Bangladeshi Kiwi Farmer powiedział(a):
Trump bailed Pakistan out the last time it was getting its shit pushed in by India because he thought it would increase his chances of winning the nobel peace prize
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I really don’t think he will ever get a Nobel peace prize from that committee.

They are political ideologues first. Think back to how Obama was given a Nobel prize in 2009 for making promises to improve relations between Muslim nations and the United States. In other words, he was given a peace prize for peace he hadn’t even achieved yet. Obama accepted it, but was a little embarrassed by the prize, considering he hadn’t earned it. But the main reason they gave it to him was to snub George W. Bush immediately after his second term ended.

It’s kind of hard to call a bunch of Norwegians and Swedes partisans for American politics, since they don’t have a dog in the hunt and don’t even live here, but that is how they act.
 
Bangladeshi Kiwi Farmer powiedział(a):
I don't see any other reason the US would turn to goatfuckistan of all places to act as a mediator
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
1778071417829.png
Main reason Pakistan was chosen was because they have normalized relations with both the US and Iran. Some other countries that could have been options for the same reason included Qatar and Oman, but I assume those two are a bit too closely US-aligned for Iran to be comfortable with them. While US-Paki relations aren't great, they're still good enough that they can serve as a mediator in this case.
Sounds good on paper, but the big issue is that Pakistan is full of Pakis.
 
Dagoth AMOGUS powiedział(a):
It’s kind of hard to call a bunch of Norwegians and Swedes partisans for American politics, since they don’t have a dog in the hunt and don’t even live here, but that is how they act.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
you have no idea bro. eurofags are more obsessed with american politics than most americans. 90% of european governments are further left wing than the american left, theyre convinced trump is literally hitler and that life in america is a hellish oligarchic dystopia. this is why they say they want to be independent of american trade and military support so bad even though ironically everything theyre doing ends up achieving the exact opposite
 
Dagoth AMOGUS powiedział(a):
I really don’t think he will ever get a Nobel peace prize from that committee.

They are political ideologues first. Think back to how Obama was given a Nobel prize in 2009 for making promises to improve relations between Muslim nations and the United States. In other words, he was given a peace prize for peace he hadn’t even achieved yet. Obama accepted it, but was a little embarrassed by the prize, considering he hadn’t earned it. But the main reason they gave it to him was to snub George W. Bush.

It’s kind of hard to call a bunch of Norwegians and Swedens partisans for American politics, since they don’t have a dog in the hunt and don’t even live here, but that is how they act.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I agree that they're ideologues, but in fairness, the whole world kind of has a dog in the fight when America is the de facto global hegemon and its policies impact everyone. It's the reason a US president can stop a war on the other side of the planet with a single phone call even when Americans have no skin in the Indo-Pak blood feud. It's also quite pathetic how eagerly Trump participates in this nobel prize dick measuring contest because Obama lives rent-free in his head. He's a petty narcissist through and through.

my penis is on fire powiedział(a):
Main reason Pakistan was chosen was because they have normalized relations with both the US and Iran. Some other countries that could have been options for the same reason included Qatar and Oman, but I assume those two are a bit too closely US-aligned for Iran to be comfortable with them. While US-Paki relations aren't great, they're still good enough that they can serve as a mediator in this case.
Sounds good on paper, but the big issue is that Pakistan is full of Pakis.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
That is a fair point. Pakistan being useless or downright detrimental still should've been a foreseeable outcome.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Lapsus of the bepsus powiedział(a):
you have no idea bro. eurofags are more obsessed with american politics than most americans. 90% of european governments are further left wing than the american left, theyre convinced trump is literally hitler and that life in america is a hellish oligarchic dystopia. this is why they say they want to be independent of american trade and military support so bad even though ironically everything theyre doing ends up achieving the exact opposite
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
As an eurofag I can confirm all this lmao. Politicians here in Wopistan are absolutely obsessed with Trump, and so are the journos. As a matter of fact, our political establishment is probably even more obsessed with Trump than other Eurocrats because our right-wing PM (who btw denied the use of our bases for Iran) gets accused 24/7 of being a Trumpist puppet by a leftist opposition that cocksucks browns and russians every chance they get.

Death to Italian journalists and politicians btw.
 
ThisIsGonnaBeGood powiedział(a):
Iran is apparently calling that JCPOA Lite deal from them an "American wishlist" lol. That's embarrassing when both the pro-Zionist and pro-Islamic sides are mocking you.
Wyświetl załącznik 8965458
Source | Archive

Oops, never mind, it's all jawboning. Enjoy the market put!
Wyświetl załącznik 8965462
Source | Archive
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I don't think it's jawboning, I think he's putting a deal to some of the moderate half and it'll be up to them to push it through the IRGC.
I also don't Trump has the balls to continue the military operation if they don't sign it either so he'll look for a quiet withdrawal if they don't. It's all about the mid-terms and he thinks the republican majority can be salvaged without additional redistricting, if that were the case he'd be free to pick the issue back up again in less than a year especially if Iran makes any motion in the meantime.

It's a gamble, if dems win the majorities he's 100% getting stuck with a war powers act and we're fucked, forever.
 
merpalerpaherp powiedział(a):
I don't think it's jawboning, I think he's putting a deal to some of the moderate half and it'll be up to them to push it through the IRGC.
I also don't Trump has the balls to continue the military operation if they don't sign it either so he'll look for a quiet withdrawal if they don't. It's all about the mid-terms and he thinks the republican majority can be salvaged without additional redistricting, if that were the case he'd be free to pick the issue back up again in less than a year especially if Iran makes any motion in the meantime.

It's a gamble, if dems win the majorities he's 100% getting stuck with a war powers act and we're fucked, forever.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

The war powers act is technically in place right now no matter who the current majority is. It's been passed and "law" for some time. Now it's been ignored/declared unconstitutional by every President since it was passed and any attempts to actually enforce it would be shut down by SCOTUS as a political question if they do not invalidate the law outright. But either way the outcome of the mid terms has no effect on that whatsoever. If the democrats control one or both chambers they can't double enforce the act or even enforce it any more than they can now. Their only options now are to sue him and hope hawaii judge tries to order the US military around (which SCOTUS would never allow), or impeach him and convict him in the senate to remove him from office. If they had the votes for that they would have. The outcome of the mid terms is not going to give the democrats 66 senate seats so again, it aint happening.

TLDR: War powers act enforcement has absolutely nothing to do with the outcome of the midterms.
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole