I’ve given up trying to establish any kind of theory of mind for the average post-conviction Rekieta supporter.
During the trial, I could at least understand some scepticism about the evidence. Fine. That’s normal.
But after being forced to confess to the crime (and then violating his probation, which he also confessed to), he is a joyless, mirthless bundle of frayed nerves.
At this point, his biggest ass-kissers might as well be the Party from Nineteen Eighty-Four.
If he says he’s not a cuck, then he’s not.
If the drugs are “legal,” then there’s no abuse.
If he’s obsessing over former colleagues, that’s not creepy, it’s justified.
If he starts spinning some grand revenge fantasy, they’re ready to grab the pitchforks.
Reality just bends to fit whatever he says in the moment, and they bend with it.
And naturally, that’s why this thread has shifted. What started as mockery has turned into people actually putting his claims, and the nonsense his defenders push, under a microscope.