💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[John Andrews Stan]

Is he truly hoping that people forget enough for him to get away with revisionist history like this, or is he just too brain-damaged to remember what has been out there in the first place?

He was always going to lie through his teeth. Possibly forgetting some details due to drug-induced brain damage is incidental.

 

[Terror_Mouse]

The goal is to:

a. Keep loyalists loyal.

b. Get anyone new who doesn't have the time to go through his Kiwi Farms thread/clip channels to buy into his story.

This would work easier if he still projected trad dad, not comical sleazy druggie from the early 2010s.

 

[Unimaginative Username]

Has anyone ever figured out why Nick thinks a restraining order application becomes "moot" if a TRO is granted and the hearing drags on long enough? I don't see anything about that in the statute. The closest thing AI can come up with is an MN supreme court case, Winkowski v. Winkowski, where an appeal against a restraining order was considered moot because the order had run out and effective relief was no longer possible. But this doesn't apply to Aaron's case because the order he requested hasn't even been granted yet and he isn't an appellant.

It's hard to interpret the ramblings of a mentally-deficient drug addict, but his theory seems to be as follows: Assume a hypothetical HRO had been granted immediately without a hearing, and also assume an expiration date for it. Now, in the real world, drag out the proceedings until the hypothetical HRO expires, and the actual HRO under consideration will also have magically expired and become moot. There may or may not be some sort of "dimensional merge" between the real world and they hypothetical world to achieve this, but I admit to being blinded by the myopia of sanity and cannot offer an informed opinion on the matter.

 

[Strix454]

Has anyone ever figured out why Nick thinks a restraining order application becomes "moot" if a TRO is granted and the hearing drags on long enough? I don't see anything about that in the statute. The closest thing AI can come up with is an MN supreme court case, Winkowski v. Winkowski, where an appeal against a restraining order was considered moot because the order had run out and effective relief was no longer possible. But this doesn't apply to Aaron's case because the order he requested hasn't even been granted yet and he isn't an appellant.

I think Nick self-invented this particular legal theory. Often these days, he just reads the law and comes up with his own personal 'common sense' vision of how the law should be applied. He seems to think that a TRO granted by a judge is the same thing as an HRO granted. But they in no way are.

Is he truly hoping that people forget enough for him to get away with revisionist history like this, or is he just too brain-damaged to remember what has been out there in the first place?

IMO he knows that his core audience will believe anything he says and that he has got so used to overtly lying to them that he just doesn't care anymore.

- Reiterates that the court "excluded the parties from the scheduling conference.... FOR NO REASON AT ALL!"; Nick wanted to be there but was told no; "The court creates it own fucking problems!"

This is another instance where Nick doesn't understand why he can't pretend to be his own attorney in the case while he has an attorney.

- Everything Aaron accuses them of is a lie and he "CAN'T WAIT!" to get on the witness stand

If that happens, it will be incredibly entertaining. You can already see that in addition to speaking for several hours on Aaron's dick and Nick's goo, he is going to attempt to play attorney & make his own case to the judge from the witness stand under cross-examination. He will explain all the laws to the judge, all the mistakes all the attorneys have made in understanding the law and it will go about as well as his efforts against the search warrant did in the criminal case.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Since this lazy wetbrained faggot couldn't be bothered to simply pull up Nevada Revised Statutes Chapter 630 on the screen for a few minutes of his hours-long legal commentary show and point out whichever section he believes to contain these "magic words" he keeps babbling about, could anyone else please take a crack at it?

I was waiting for Nick to switch his opinion to "emergency care" after reading this thread, so I can now tell him that NONE OF THAT IS IN THAT STATUTE.
There are exceptions in that statute, but none of them are blanket allowances for unlicensed doctors to practice medicine in the state.

The exceptions are for specific types of lower licensed individuals, trainees, technicians etc. who have subject matter knowledge and training, hold some type of license already, but are usually not allowed to practice unsupervised. In case of emergency a medical student for example is allowed to perform CPR to save a life without supervision.

The license statute does not contain a single paragraph regarding "normal people" performing medical procedures in cases of emergencies.
That is what an unlicensed doctor is, just a normal guy. They do not get special treatment at all. Either you are licensed, or you are not.

 

[Terror_Mouse]

It's hard to interpret the ramblings of a mentally-deficient drug addict, but his theory seems to be as follows: Assume a hypothetical HRO had been granted immediately without a hearing, and also assume an expiration date for it. Now, int he real world, drag out the proceedings until the hypothetical HRO expires, and the actual HRO under consideration will also have magically expired and become moot. There may or may not be some sort of "dimensional merge" between the real world and they hypothetical world to achieve this, but I admit to being blinded by the myopia of sanity and cannot offer an informed opinion on the matter.

It actually makes sense if you're not a lawyer. As a non-lawyer, I get the argument. "Wait, if the order is 'Bob can't talk about Jill for a year,' then if a year goes by, why still fight about it? Bob hasn't talked about Jill for a year."

But if you're smarter than a dumb non-lawyer, you'll see: "Ah, because the matter hasn't actually been litigated, the year timer hasn't started because the temporary order and the full order are actually two different clocks, not a single clock."

Nick might try a stupid man's attempt at analogy likening it to time spent in jail pre-trial being counted towards sentencing, but that's because he doesn't understand how these are two different things.

 

[JamFlowMan]

If that happens, it will be incredibly entertaining. You can already see that in addition to speaking for several hours on Aaron's dick and Nick's goo, he is going to attempt to play attorney & make his own case to the judge from the witness stand under cross-examination. He will explain all the laws to the judge, all the mistakes all the attorneys have made in understanding the law and it will go about as well as his efforts against the search warrant did in the criminal case.

He thinks he's going to go up on the stand and be like Johnny Depp but really he'll be that Dr who argued about what The Goldwater Rule for 2 hours.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

He thinks he's going to go up on the stand and be like Johnny Depp but really he'll be that Dr who argued about what The Goldwater Rule for 2 hours.

Nick will be Amber Turd.
Lying on the stand, then shown video evidence of previous conflicting statements.

 

[Vibralldo]

That’s my honest genuine explanation about how he’s getting away with all this shit. It’s not the zooluminati or mysterious connections, it’s an overworked government drone who couldn’t give less of a fuck being bombarded by a “well actually…” pedantic faggoty fuckstick. Much easier to just let him get away with whatever. Especially in a place like Minnesota that’s become so aggressively pro-criminal recently.

Probably why he does it so much. Annoying people into submission has worked before.

 

[Brian Oblivion]

That doctor is more egregious. He epitomises everything the public deems wrong about the healthcare profession in the worst way possible. He is a man that makes likely half a million a year, mill pills to his friends, while he gets to train the next generation of doctors. He deserves everything that's coming.

I remember during the height of the opioid epidemic there were a bunch of rural family physicians who got busted for handing out oxycodone prescriptions like candy for basically made up conditions while only seeing their patients through telehealth/phone meetings etc. It's crazy to see a doctor not only currently doing this type of stuff openly but also essentially bragging about it.

 

[Beavis]

Why is this bitch even entertaining people that aren’t paying for a super chat

His show would be four hours of dead air if he wasn’t arguing with chat trolls.

 

[Vibralldo]

Maybe you should just go read the statute and maybe take a CLE on it, Sean! SEAN!

That dick sucking open mouth vape followed by the whiny, smug "Sean didn't read the statue!" voice

Jesus, someone needs to smash this faggot's teeth in with a brick so he shuts the fuck up

 

[not william stenchever]

So much of his unhappiness comes from denying that he is a bi leaning homo.

I'm reading the new book series by the guys that did The Expanse and all the scientists fucking each other in the ass are far less performatively gay than Rackets. They're dealing with questions like how to continue the species under the domination of an alien empire while Nick is consumed by the idea of Aaron's penis.

 

[Potentially Criminal]

Maybe you should just go read the statute and maybe take a CLE on it, Sean! SEAN!

THEY SAY I READ LAW LIKE A SOVEREIGN CITIZEN, SEAN

 

[Maraschino]

If that happens, it will be incredibly entertaining. You can already see that in addition to speaking for several hours on Aaron's dick and Nick's goo, he is going to attempt to play attorney & make his own case to the judge from the witness stand under cross-examination. He will explain all the laws to the judge, all the mistakes all the attorneys have made in understanding the law and it will go about as well as his efforts against the search warrant did in the criminal case.

If this happens, we're gonna need a transcript immediately.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Wyświetl załącznik 8895845
Totally sober btw

We've reached level 4!

 

[florida_cat_enjoyer]

Probably why he does it so much. Annoying people into submission has worked before.

I had a neighbor growing up who told us that if you’re annoying and persistent enough, you can get almost anything.

 

[not william stenchever]

I had a neighbor growing up who told us that if you’re annoying and persistent enough, you can get almost anything.

I think that the appropriate way that a society should deal with such a thing is a quick death. But nobody wants such a mess to mar their day so the miserable existence of such beings continues in spite of all reason.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Regardless of whether the judge grants the HRO or not, Aaron has secured an undisputed W by fucking with Nick and Melton in this specific way for close to a year. Sure, Nick did the heavy lifting in terms of fucking his own shit up, but a dub is a dub.

I anticipate Aaron to wipe out most of the benefit soon enough by running his retarded mouth.

 

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

- Sean isn't dumb, he's dishonest for clout

Hasn't he spent more than a year calling Sean fat and dumb?

- The judge dragged his feet; he prevented them from appealing, prevented them from getting writ of mandamus

Yes, it's the judge's fault a simple HRO has taken this long and not Nick's behavior, sure.

- There "is an argument, maybe" that Aaron violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act by revealing "private medical information"

Revealed a document that was produced in open court.

- crazy amount of vaping, he's glued to that thing

It's a substitute for Aaron's dick.

- Reiterates that the court "excluded the parties from the scheduling conference.... FOR NO REASON AT ALL!"

The reason is that the judge finds him insufferable and doesn't want to be around him. If Nick was better at picking up on social cues he would understand this.

- Proof of Nick's legal acumen: his plea deal was "pretty universally praised" as a "really, really excellent plea deal"

Weren't most people surprised how long it ended up being?

- Pretends he isn't involved in any way with Melton's case and didn't tell him to hire the same lawyer

No one believes this.

- Everything Aaron accuses them of is a lie and he "CAN'T WAIT!" to get on the witness stand

Massive projection.

- The judge is a "coward" who "may very well rule against" Nick

Pre-emptive cope.

- Nick has considered firing his lawyers multiple times and "may still do"; it's a tough decision if he will hire new counsel or proceed pro se

Please go pro se. It would be so funny.