💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[RaptInPlastic]

I hope this second federal investigation into Dabbleverse faggotry has more consequences than the previous investigation into illegally accessing Aaron's Google Account.

Aaron's attorney is doing his best to cross them over at the moment. I think as much as anything he is a file everything kind of guy.
But as long as it's terriifying Rekieta I am all for it.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Aaron's attorney is doing his best to cross them over at the moment. I think as much as anything he is a file everything kind of guy.
But as long as it's terriifying Rekieta I am all for it.

I hope he continues to file fucking everything, because as much as the judge wants to bitch about "too much evidence" being submitted, it is not Aaron's fault that Nick and Melton keep producing harassing content at a prodigious rate.

Everything needs to be filed to become part of the record.
Anything not filed is irrelevant down the line.

Maybe if the judge wasn't such an wimpy pussy and did something about the blatant TRO violations, it would not be necessary.
But if one thing has been made abundantly clear, it is this: Nick Rekieta has a teflon suit and nobody in Minnesota is holding him accountable. If ANYONE goes up against Nick, they need to overload the record with evidence to show how outrageous Nick's behavior is.

 

[RaptInPlastic]

I hope he continues to file fucking everything, because as much as the judge wants to bitch about "too much evidence" being submitted, it is not Aaron's fault that Nick and Melton keep producing harassing content at a prodigious rate.

Everything needs to be filed to become part of the record.
Anything not filed is irrelevant down the line.

Maybe if the judge wasn't such an wimpy pussy and did something about the blatant TRO violations, it would not be necessary.
But if one thing has been made abundantly clear, it is this: Nick Rekieta has a teflon suit and nobody in Minnesota is holding him accountable. If ANYONE goes up against Nick, they need to overload the record with evidence to show how outrageous Nick's behavior is.

Totally sober btw

 

[CoomerTine]

Its not just the streaming hour. Its what he streams about. When he does these streams, they are mostly either him talking about himself (especially at the start of these streams) or general rambling at the audience. He doesn't properly prepare topics or try to create a general interest show. He also is trapped into doing shows where its all him because nobody will appear with him anymore.

I was actually kinda interested in his opinion on the Tyler Robinson case when he was streaming the hearing but he kept reacting to people bringing up his case in chat and I couldn’t give a fuck less

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

I was actually kinda interested in his opinion on the Tyler Robinson case when he was streaming the hearing but he kept reacting to people bringing up his case in chat and I couldn’t give a fuck less

Nick is also kinda fucked because everyone who used to do panels for cases before now has found their niche area on Youtube.
Andrea Burkhart does live commentary for televised trials, why would I want to listen to Nick instead of an actual attorney with real world appellate experience?
And then there are multiple channels doing short or long form videos when important events in each trial happen.

Nick is, in terms of lawtube relevance, fucking dead.
Even Branca is no longer carrying his ass, he has found a niche doing supreme court commentary, explaining the legalese and mocking the Democrat appointed retards and their attempts to derail cases that will ruin Democrat policies for decades.

 

[daffodils]

Nick is reviewing the clip of Sean discussing the Dr. Steve issue. Nick's main argument is fake laughing at his own fat jokes.

- Sean isn't dumb, he's dishonest for clout
- Melton produced the letter on Friday, there was no reason to produce it earlier
- The judge "acted as a coward", he wanted to put pressure on Melton and Nick, that's why he waited two weeks to rule
- They should have been granted the continuance because they didn't "cause undue delay" in the case
- There was a "scheduling glitch" caused by his replacement attorney; Patrick and him "weren't allowed" at the scheduling conference
- It should have been changed; the judge not granting continuance was "crazy"
- The judge dragged his feet; he prevented them from appealing, prevented them from getting writ of mandamus
- Nick makes a big deal out of Melton being away from his healthcare provider if he was forced to travel, but doesn't explain why he couldn't get a note from that healthcare provider
- Dr. Steve is "probably wrong on the HIPAA thing, everyone is wrong about HIPAA all the time"
- There "is an argument, maybe" that Aaron violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act by revealing "private medical information" [he didn't]
- Agitated: "I can call Aaron Imholte a faggot all day... I can talk about personal experiences with him... I can share photos... I can do all of these things" and it's not harassment
- "The second... THE SECOND... I get to talk to court about privacy and the sharing of private information... he's gonna have some issues... [cope vape]"
- The letter is protected information submitted in a court hearing under seal
- Sean is completely incorrect on the licensing statute, guaranteed he hasn't read it
- License isn't always required in Nevada to practice medicine [very smug, so that's probably his killer argument]
- absolutely seeething at Sean because he has given Aaron advice once or twice
- crazy amount of vaping, he's glued to that thing
- Highly agitated: no one in court just googles a letter for two minutes and says it's "fraud"; Sean as an attorney would never do this; it's "amazing" that he just sits there and lies about it, "HE KNOWS HE'S TELLING A LIE!"
- Starts googling Dr. Steve, takes forever
- Ultimately finds a connection between Steve and his company, which is proof there's no "fraud"
- Steve didn't expose himself to any liability, he's acting within the statute as a medical expert
- Nick thinks something Sean says about "misrepresenting the letter to the court" is an argument he "got from Aaron"; starts screeching, voice cracking, hands flapping... "This lying faggot!"
- Reiterates that the court "excluded the parties from the scheduling conference.... FOR NO REASON AT ALL!"; Nick wanted to be there but was told no; "The court creates it own fucking problems!"
- Sean says the Dabbleverse thinks Nick is good and smart because they hate Aaron; Nick completely misses the point and starts talking about how he is much more famous than Aaron
- Proof of Nick's legal acumen: his plea deal was "pretty universally praised" as a "really, really excellent plea deal"
- Pretends he isn't involved in any way with Melton's case and didn't tell him to hire the same lawyer
- Everything Aaron accuses them of is a lie and he "CAN'T WAIT!" to get on the witness stand
- Nick talks about Aaron's strategy: The judge said he won't let the HRO expire until he makes a decision; Aaron wants to run out the clock; he wants this to continue to June 26 when it will moot, and then Aaron can say he had a valid HRO against Nick; but now the judge will render a decision, it "won't be mooted out by time", which is good
- Sean says there's "no secret mic drop moments" in court; Nick cackles
- Nick screeches again about there being an exemption in the Nevada statue
- Sean hasn't read the statute; Aaron's lawyer hasn't read the harassment statue
- The judge is a "coward" who "may very well rule against" Nick
- The case wouldn't have gone differently in any way if Nick had just shut up
- Judge Ole tried to force them to agree to the order because he knows that otherwise the press would destroy him for being against the first amendment, against the constitution
- Nick screeches that he knows Minnesota law better than Sean, especially "in a practice area [Nick] has had a lot of success in"
- People in county government "have it out for" Nick, they leaked information after his arrest
- Nick has considered firing his lawyers multiple times and "may still do"; it's a tough decision if he will hire new counsel or proceed pro se
- The judge was "afraid" to issue an order, but has changed course now; Nick was pretty sure he would "let it run out", but now he's not going to
- Nick didn't yell or scream in a court room, he spoke very calmly to a lawyer; he talks about the "childish response" and that he know how to exploit it again
- Aaron has perjured himself in court by saying he never told someone to kill himself; Nick "can't wait" to play the clip where he told CitizenM to "neck himself"
- Nick talks about the exemptions in the Nevada statute again, but his examples are either about providing emergency medical care or having a prescription written by your doctor at home when you are travelling

This isn't all, but I have to go.

 

[demicolon]

Nick's entire house is a foots high pile of garbage from Hoarder Hell. He's desperately ashamed of this but he doesn't do anything to fix it.

They're building clothes castles for the keeedz to play with. Shut up.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Nick talks about the exemptions in the Nevada statute again

If Nick would read this thread, he would have found explanations about the emergency nature of the exception.
I bet he is just asking chatGPT and relying on the bullshit summaries.

the judge not granting continuance was "crazy"

Failing to request a continuance when the scheduling conflict becomes apparent is crazy.
Only an entitled nepo baby expects everyone to jump and change all schedules for them.

Dr. Steve is "probably wrong on the HIPAA thing, everyone is wrong about HIPAA all the time"

Yes Nick, the medical professional is wrong about the law that applies specifically to him.
You are a genius without peer.

The letter is protected information submitted in a court hearing under seal

Then why the fuck are you talking about it non-stop faggot?

I can call Aaron Imholte a faggot all day... I can talk about personal experiences with him... I can share photos... I can do all of these things" and it's not harassment

Yes Nick, just like your Franks Motion will be successful any day now.
Your legal acumen is without peer in the western hemisphere.

Everything Aaron accuses them of is a lie and he "CAN'T WAIT!" to get on the witness stand

Finally something I can agree to. I also CANNOT WAIT for Nick to be on the witness stand.

Judge Ole tried to force them to agree to the order because he knows that otherwise the press would destroy him for being against the first amendment, against the constitution

No you lying faggot. The judge already denied your untimely request for a continuance, and then ONLY offered to grant it despite already denying it if you agreed to the stipulation. You did not, so YOU refused your own continuance, which you are not bitching about.

Nick has considered firing his lawyers multiple times and "may still do"; it's a tough decision if he will hire new counsel or proceed pro se

I think Nick is right here. His lawyer has been very ineffective. He would do a better job himself. If the goal is to generate the best possible entertainment.

The judge was "afraid" to issue an order, but has changed course now; Nick was pretty sure he would "let it run out", but now he's not going to

Nick continuously misrepresenting the facts of the case is just hilarious to me. It is the same playbook as with the cocaine arrest, and in the end he plead guilty. Same denial and dumb excuses why everyone is conspiring.



Russell Greer has done a better job representing himself than Nick has.

 

[That's not TRUE]

Nick is reviewing the clip of Sean discussing the Dr. Steve issue. Nick's main argument is fake laughing at his own fat jokes.

Nick doing NickR things. Watching this back is so frustrating. Nick twisting logic to the point it breaks the laws of physics. Incredible.

*vape* *monster* *vape* *monster* *vape* *monster* *vape* *monster* *vape* *monster*

 

[AltisticRight]

Everything needs to be filed to become part of the record.

yes, like Aaron's curved penis and his gooooooooooo!

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

yes, like Aaron's curved penis and his gooooooooooo!

I cannot wait for Nick to harass Aaron on the stand, and then cry about "muh first amendment!!!"
The faggot is so far gone even the dead skunk buried in his backyard has a higher IQ.

"I brought this panel to explain the issue."

 

[That's not TRUE]

- Nick talks about the exemptions in the Nevada statute again, but his examples are either about providing emergency medical care or having a prescription written by your doctor at home when you are travelling

Nick is going on-and-on how what Steve did is completely fine because he's providing emergency care. The doctor note was emergency care.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

The doctor note was emergency care.

So after not understanding the exception Nick has now come around to understanding it was for emergency care, and he is now pretending that filling a prescription for backpain the "patient" already had a week prior, is an emergency?

Keep talking Nick. Just a few more huffs of nitrousVAPE and you will have convinced the entire internet.

 

[Father Balldo]

HE RESTED HIS CASE, SEAAAAAAAAAAN!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Horrified Bystander]

I'm imagining Nick trying to treat his PO like he treats twitter alogs.
"So Mr.Rekieta due to your missed tests we'll be increasing yo-"
"That didn't happen."

That’s my honest genuine explanation about how he’s getting away with all this shit. It’s not the zooluminati or mysterious connections, it’s an overworked government drone who couldn’t give less of a fuck being bombarded by a “well actually…” pedantic faggoty fuckstick. Much easier to just let him get away with whatever. Especially in a place like Minnesota that’s become so aggressively pro-criminal recently.

 

[Potentially Cat Mom]

Totally sober btw

It is just a heat allergy. Duh.

 

[daffodils]

Has anyone ever figured out why Nick thinks a restraining order application becomes "moot" if a TRO is granted and the hearing drags on long enough? I don't see anything about that in the statute. The closest thing AI can come up with is an MN supreme court case, Winkowski v. Winkowski, where an appeal against a restraining order was considered moot because the order had run out and effective relief was no longer possible. But this doesn't apply to Aaron's case because the order he requested hasn't even been granted yet and he isn't an appellant.

 

[RaptInPlastic]

Has anyone ever figured out why Nick thinks a restraining order application becomes "moot" if a TRO is granted and the hearing drags on long enough? I don't see anything about that in the statute. The closest thing AI can come up with is an MN supreme court case, Winkowski v. Winkowski, where an appeal against a restraining order was considered moot because the order had run out and effective relief was no longer possible. But this doesn't apply to Aaron's case because the order he requested hasn't even been granted yet and he isn't an appellant.

I thought Aaron has T ROs not H ROs yet, with T meaning Temporary, ie until the hearing. The hearing that Rekieta was constantly delaying because the current order lets him talk about Aaron but not physically approach him.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

I thought Aaron has T ROs not H ROs yet, with T meaning Temporary, ie until the hearing. The hearing that Rekieta was constantly delaying because the current order lets him talk about Aaron but not physically approach him.

As far as I understand, your understanding is correct. A TRO is granted based on an affidavit made by the applicant (Aaron), and a hearing regarding the TRO was held, during which Nick/Melton failed to explain why it should not be granted.

In parallel the process for a HRO was started, and the TRO stays in place until the court decides on the HRO.
Aaron has participated in attempts for a settlement between the parties in good faith (likely because his lawyer told him to follow whatever the court wants to do), but Nick and Melton have not participated in that process in good faith, which is why we do not have a settlement.

Everyone knew that Nick and Melton were never interested in a settlement, but the judge had to come to that realization himself the hard way, which he just did.
Now the case is scheduled for an actual hearing, in which evidence will be presented, and the judge decides.

The TRO was NEVER going to "run out", because it was specifically put in place to bridge the time until either the judge makes a decision, or the parties settle.
Nick is hallucinating shit again. He himself is the reason the TRO still exists.

 

[Folgers Can]

- Sean is completely incorrect on the licensing statute, guaranteed he hasn't read it

Maybe you should just go read the statute and maybe take a CLE on it, Sean! SEAN!

2:13

Since this lazy wetbrained faggot couldn't be bothered to simply pull up Nevada Revised Statutes Chapter 630 on the screen for a few minutes of his hours-long legal commentary show and point out whichever section he believes to contain these "magic words" he keeps babbling about, could anyone else please take a crack at it? Assuming Internet bloodsports don't count as an "athletic" event, and being that there certainly was no "emergency" when the patient himself publicly announced his ongoing condition ten days before Hackamania and the patient himself publicly announced in Dr. Skeeve's presence that his care had also begun "weeks" before Hackamania, what other exception is the secret ace up Nick's sleeve to be saved for an epic Perry Mason moment? Is there a lawyer in the house?

I suppose one could ask @Potentially Criminal but don't hold your breath for an answer until after STMS is off the air, so he can finally get his talking points from Boss Toe and get their stories straight, according to this guy's world-renowned ESP:

4:10

Nick had the family court records sealed so that he could lie at will about what happened in family court. He has constantly made all sorts of wild accusations about CPS and others involved in the case. He can say practically anything he wants and get away with it.

Wrong, Nick will have you know that far from his having "had the family court records sealed," in fact the Court was so shocked and appalled by the gang of pedophiles hunting down his children that the order to seal pretty much just came together sua sponte:

2:08

Nevermind of course that Nick and Kayla paid their attorneys to file a motion specifically requesting that very relief, albeit for different stated reasons:





[L]

Is he truly hoping that people forget enough for him to get away with revisionist history like this, or is he just too brain-damaged to remember what has been out there in the first place?