🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

IMG_8671.jpeg
Anyone surprised to learn that Greer is a filthy little gremlin who lives in an unkempt bedroom? Gross, having to clean that; blech.
 
1774556007708.png
I want a classic Rekieta Rule of Completeness on this, I can't begin to imagine the extreme spergout Russell is sending the Landlord right now.
 
I know we should be happy with what we've got, but today would be a truly wonderful day for Matthew D. Hardin Esquire to drop a Summary Motion to Dismiss citing Cox.
 
HE LEFT HIS SHIT IN THE ROOM. He was SO SURE of victory he didn't remove one piece of drool-soaked garbage at any point.

This guy needs to come out of Lolcow Emeritus and BACK IN THE AWARDS RUNNING.
For which he'll be liable for storage and disposal costs once his window to collect his property closes.

Once again, he's asserting that he withheld rent because "the landlord broke the law". Can't do that! He can litigate those issues separately if he wants but it won't get him the unit back. If he's successful, the most he could win is a small rent abatement which would only offset the amount of back rent+costs owing and create an even longer paper trail warning any future landlord who searches his name.
 
I was trying to read it, but it's too tiny...
boomer zoomed for informational purposes

Wyświetl załącznik 8761310


WARNING - KEEP OUT

THESE PREMISES HAVE BEEN SEALED BY A LAS VEGAS JUSTICE COURT EVICTION ORDER
IT IS A CRIME TO RE-ENTER THESE PREMISES WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE LAS VEGAS JUSTICE COURT OR PERMISSION OF THE OWNER.
THE MINIMUM PENALTY FOR UNLAWFUL BREAKING INTO VACANT PROPERTY (NRS 205.0813) OR UNLAWFUL OCCUPANCY OF REAL PROPERTY (NRS 205.8017) IS A SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE YEAR IN THE COUNTY JAIL, A FINE OF UP TO $2,000, OR BOTH. SUBSEQUENT OFFENSES ARE SUBJECT TO SENTENCING FOR A CATEGORY D FELONY WITH A SENTENCE OF 1-4 YEARS IN STATE PRISON, A FINE OF UP TO $5,000, OR BOTH.
VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDER IS A MISDEMEANOR AS SPECIFIED IN NRS 22.020 AND NRS 199.340.

(Stole the text from a better resolution picture of the same notice)
 
Rule #1 in a landlord-tenant dispute is you never, ever, ever withhold rent. No matter what law the landlord may have broken, withholding rent will get you evicted. While proceedings are ongoing, any arrangement other than paying the rent as it becomes due requires approval from the court.
Actually you can withhold rent, but the process is you put it in an escrow account so that if you lose whatever dispute you are having, that goes to the rent.
I'm curious, can someone from the supreme court simply get out a "DENIED" stamp and stamp his documents and then sign them? What could he do? Appeal?
Pretty much. They can just ignore his appeal without even any explanation. "Retard didn't pay rent, got evicted" is not a matter of precedent. It's a matter of retard getting evicted for not paying rent.
The Nevada Supreme Court said "lol no" and struck his motion to stay. Document not yet available
Wyświetl załącznik 8760855
And lmao they literally already did it.

I'm liking Nevada.
 
Actually you can withhold rent, but the process is you put it in an escrow account so that if you lose whatever dispute you are having, that goes to the rent.
He is claiming he's employed "in the gig-share economy... and was prepared to pay weekly rent into the court". If he's got weekly rent money, then he's got cheap ass motel money. He should have just vacated to a less hostile place where he wasn't facing an un-stayed eviction order.

Or, as a lying liar who lies, he's likely lying about being able to pay any rent. One might note his insistence on escrow-free defense options and draw a suspicious inference.
 
He is claiming he's employed "in the gig-share economy... and was prepared to pay weekly rent into the court". If he's got weekly rent money, then he's got cheap ass motel money. He should have just vacated to a less hostile place where he wasn't facing an un-stayed eviction order.

Or, as a lying liar who lies, he's likely lying about being able to pay any rent. One might note his insistence on escrow-free defense options and draw a suspicious inference.
Is it too relate to request a refund on the court fees?
 
Actually you can withhold rent, but the process is you put it in an escrow account so that if you lose whatever dispute you are having, that goes to the rent.
Gotcha, I'm surprised given everything I'm seeing here that Nevada allows a tenant to just do it. In my jurisdiction the TT needs permission from the court to pay rent into escrow and it would have to be some kind of extenuating circumstance like an LL who has a history of noncompliance. If the LL is making a good faith effort to rectify the issue such an order wouldn't be granted. I had a shithead TT try to pull this one on me and ask for a rent abatement years ago over the same thing (too cold, but I was doing everything I could to get the boiler fixed) and they were denied.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole