🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

Rule #1 in a landlord-tenant dispute is you never, ever, ever withhold rent. No matter what law the landlord may have broken, withholding rent will get you evicted. While proceedings are ongoing, any arrangement other than paying the rent as it becomes due requires approval from the court.

One would hope a trained paralegal would know this, especially after eviction #3, but here we are.

I must say I really admire how expeditious the Nevada eviction courts are. The fact that eviction is so straightforward is the only reason Greer can continue finding housing. If he were in say, California he would spend the rest of his life homeless. As much as housing "advocates" may disagree, a strict no-nonsense eviction process gives landlords the opportunity to take a chance on someone with a blemished background. In jurisdictions where eviction is a long, complicated process it can be harder to rent an apartment than to get a mortgage. It's not unusual for a landlord/PM to run credit checks, criminal background checks, employment verification, ask for references and months of bank statements, plus the good ol' vibe check.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I'm curious, can someone from the supreme court simply get out a "DENIED" stamp and stamp his documents and then sign them? What could he do? Appeal?

And yet I can't help but suspect that any other person would have been aware of the upcoming eviction beyond a reasonable doubt.
Like receiving the court's order on the 24th telling you your appeal was denied? Then admitting that? Surely for the 3rd eviction you'd know how it goes by now.
 
The Nevada Supreme Court said "lol no" and struck his motion to stay. Document not yet available
Screenshot_20260326_203725_Firefox.jpg
 
This is my favorite bit. Russell by his own admission had 48 hours to find new lodgings or some kind of emergency option after anyone (who is not as retarded as him) would declare it over and done with. What did our favorite droolpauper do? He spent that time on his phone frantically asking AI to draft him a new impossible appeal (in between hassling Instagram models I'm sure) in order to stay in a hostile, shared residence he refuses to pay for.

1774550823357.png
 
1774551103962.png
🎶"It'll be lonely this Easter,
Without you to hold
It'll be lonely this Easter
Lonely and cold
It'll be cold, so cold
Without you to hold
This Easter"🎶
 
I'm just imagining him being physically dragged out of the condo
I hope the constables were equipped with adequate PPE.

Shall! The magical imperative One Word To Rule Them All in the judicial system!
Except Utah.

What could he do? Appeal?
If past behavior is a good indicator of future behavior, yes.

Imagine the stress and panic he's currently feeling. I bet it's similar to the way a person might feel if a stalker threatened to go to their house and commit suicide by 9 mm on the front porch.
 
AGAIN with defective service.

Hypothetically, if Greer remedied the issues with this motion, what remedy would the courts even have? Greer, without using those words, seems to be asking for specific performance (forcing the LL to reinstate his tenancy) but I don't think that's an available remedy in this case. Greer is no longer in possession of the unit which is a shared occupancy with the landlord and a court can't force two people to live together. If by some stroke of luck Greer's motion were successful he'd be entitled to what, a few nights in a motel and moving expenses, offset against the amount he owes Schaeffer? In other words, nothing.

Greer also has a duty to mitigate his damages, ie looking for alternative housing instead of wasting his time.
 
How stupid is he that he thinks the court is okay with him writing "I sent the service for this by e-mail to my landlord, trust me!"? In no court anywhere in this country would that be considered appropriate service. He didn't even fucking bother to name his landlord. Not to mention it is his FORMER landlord since he has been evicted. He is so retarded.
 
AGAIN with defective service.

Hypothetically, if Greer remedied the issues with this motion, what remedy would the courts even have? Greer, without using those words, seems to be asking for specific performance (forcing the LL to reinstate his tenancy) but I don't think that's an available remedy in this case. Greer is no longer in possession of the unit which is a shared occupancy with the landlord and a court can't force two people to live together. If by some stroke of luck Greer's motion were successful he'd be entitled to what, a few nights in a motel and moving expenses, offset against the amount he owes Schaeffer? In other words, nothing.

Greer also has a duty to mitigate his damages, ie looking for alternative housing instead of wasting his time.
I am dubious of his claim that he required special notice.

The court gave him notice.

And regardless of that, he cannot be un-evicted, that would be equal to the court taking the landlord's property.
If anything Greer would have to sue the police department who enforced the eviction.
 
I am sitting here, radiating satisfaction like a big, serene, autistic buddha. The wheel of karma turns, Rusty the Drool Golem is evicted for not paying his fucking rent, and balance returns to the universe.
DSB.webp
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole