🌟 Internet Famous Turkey Tom / TomDark / @NotATurkey / TomDarkLive / anonbirdd / Thomas Larry Hanson - KiwiTuber, "Her Prostate" enjoyer, chronic shitstirrer, Destiny worshipper, pronouns respecter, Mr.Beast bootlicker, serial cheater, cuck, Kiwi Farms induced erectile dysfunction

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Axiom.
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
This is such bullshit because Channing wasn't even talking about herself. She ran with someone else's story and botched it so bad that it doesn't even matter if it was true or not.

It really nauseates me how much pushback there is for talking to people. There's no way I can ever do another interview with anyone again. There's no point. If they say something that's not true it's my fault. It's the exact logic that trannies are going to use when they sue us and tbh we probably won't survive that lawsuit coming up. What is even the point of running this shit when not only does the entire Internet blame me personally for everything said, but the people on this site also burden me with personal liability for everything? Why do I bother?
This was literally what I replied to you on Twitter about. This was completely avoidable. You are even apprehensive on the podcast preceding the actual interview. Yet when I posted my reply you blocked me. This is literally why nobody should ever, even in the attempt to shed light, should ever get in the middle of couple arguments on the internet. Just watch and enjoy. Don't get involved because now this has spiraled into a massively embarrassing period for the forum. And your reactions to criticism have been less than professional. All of this is so gay and lame.
 
Null defends women, incels get mad at people who defend women
Its wild that all it takes to send them into a tailspin is to just give women the same leeway you'd give anyone else. I can't imagine what it's like to go through life automatically assuming half the population are liars and manipulators who want nothing but the worst for you. It must be tiresome.
 
It’s all cumulative. He had to retain legal counsel to resolve this situation. He had to invest resources to silence the nutcase. How the hell do you make a living off lolcows, and fail to notice when you are being ensnared by people with lolcow tendencies?
Turkey Tom is still relatively young (23) and as it is often the case became blinded with "infinite hoes for being famous" and could not resist putting his dick into every crazy bitch that is willing. He also clearly has some underlying issues that go back to his first girlfriend that cucked him with his friend and is trying to "settle the score" or something.

Overall, I think 90% of Tom's stupidity can be explained by him being unable to resist easy sex. You browse through this thread and you can still find dozens of people thirstposting over these dumb whores so it's not like this behavior is particularly rare among men.
 
People are so soy nowadays that they don’t care about free speech. It’s sad. Lolsuits and lolfare are gay af.
It's not the free speech that people are criticizing null about. It's the fact he got involved to begin with. At least for me anyway. It's gay and lame and nobody except for the parties involved should step in no matter what. Just watch and form your opinions. That's all
 
You browse through this thread and you can still find dozens of people thirstposting over these dumb whores so it's not like this behavior is particularly rare among men.
Why don't you go ahead and quote some posts that were thirsting after them since the apology letter was posted? I'm not saying those posts definitely don't exist, I just haven't noticed any.
 
He also clearly has some underlying issues that go back to his first girlfriend that cucked him with his friend and is trying to "settle the score" or something.
Actually forgot all about that. There's no way having a fully public cuckening isn't going to permanently destroy your relationships with women and sex. I feel like it would be surprising if something like this DIDN'T happen again to him.
 
She was his girlfriend, she did know him, she did have evidence. Literally what was I supposed to ask for? The reality is true: Turkey Tom's long-term ex-girlfriend accused him of violent and unwanted sexual behavior. There is no way for me to determine if she's actually lying or not from just our conversations. In the interview I asked her questions to strain her story and several of her responses were used by Turkey Tom to exonerate himself. He used her responses from that interview to help further his own narrative. Literally what more could I have done?!
Unfortunately I think this is a no win scenario. Simply by being the owner and operator of the site, you not only have external opposition due to numerous personal justifications others might have (both mental illness and greed based) as well significant internal opposition from people who simply exist to be contrarian or in an attempt to make a name for themselves by taking a shot at you.

If you attempt to completely remove yourself from taking a position of any type and remain impartial, people will accuse you of weakness and if you attempt to voice any position people will immediately take the counter argument.

My only idea would to create some level of protocols for people to follow before gaining access to any platform you don’t openly offer complete access to. Likely involving a small panel of trusted individuals to screen for possible flaws or holes. Secondly I’d suggest any interview involving someone asserting tangential or actual legally actionable material to be hosted by a panel. By having more than one person asking questions and probing the authenticity of the speaker, it relieves you of a bit of the burden and creates a potentially higher critical threshold on the subject.
 
Actually forgot all about that. There's no way having a fully public cuckening isn't going to permanently destroy your relationships with women and sex. I feel like it would be surprising if something like this DIDN'T happen again to him.
Yeah, it is very sad because thanks to the dumb lying bpd whores now you can't really discuss Tom's retarded sex history since it's overshadowed by all the bullshit stories of "penis mines" and so on. There is definitely a good ground to dig in but the soil has been poisoned by bullshit and until Tom makes some extremely embarassing blunder like Sam Hyde's "Gorilla Nest" incident, people will just continue to gloss over this.
 
It doesn't make sense for Null to get shit for this. I'm pretty sure he said he wasn't going to feature the thread until the claims seemed more credible, so then people said he was sweeping for Tom.

And then when Tom released the apology, everyone went anti-Null like he was trying to push the situation before it was fleshed out. He didn't do much before the apology besides inviting the girls to the farms, acting as a quick contact for updates, and MATI.

I think everyone wanted the girls to be fair and honest, and since the interview was the first time they spoke about it vocally in a digestible way that wasn't hundreds of thread pages, people who couldn't be bothered to read the full context pinned the girls lies on Null because MATI was their only experience with the situation.

Blaming the shortest summary of the situation as the key reason all this happened is so retarded and zoomer brained. I noticed most people getting angry at Null don't even remember key parts of the situation because it wasn't brought up on the podcast.
Who is anti null here? Everyone is not shitting in null. They are only bitching about platforming dumbwhores and null himself being in the center of it all, which wasn't a necessary part on null but he did it anyway.

However, Null could've have platformed DSP and result would've been the same. People bitching about why null platformed a bygone, senile old streamer who is way pass his prime.

You get shit for platforming anyone and anybody. Its not indicative of people hating on null.
 
Unfortunately I think this is a no win scenario. Simply by being the owner and operator of the site, you not only have external opposition due to numerous personal justifications others might have (both mental illness and greed based) as well significant internal opposition from people who simply exist to be contrarian or in an attempt to make a name for themselves by taking a shot at you.

If you attempt to completely remove yourself from taking a position of any type and remain impartial, people will accuse you of weakness and if you attempt to voice any position people will immediately take the counter argument.

My only idea would to create some level of protocols for people to follow before gaining access to any platform you don’t openly offer complete access to. Likely involving a small panel of trusted individuals to screen for possible flaws or holes. Secondly I’d suggest any interview involving someone asserting tangential or actual legally actionable material to be hosted by a panel. By having more than one person asking questions and probing the authenticity of the speaker, it relieves you of a bit of the burden and creates a potentially higher critical threshold on the subject.
Edit: my bad i missread your comment im a retard who cant speak english
 
It's not the free speech that people are criticizing null about. It's the fact he got involved to begin with. At least for me anyway. It's gay and lame and nobody except for the parties involved should step in no matter what. Just watch and form your opinions. That's all
>mfw the guy who owns the gossip site interviews the gossip starter about the gossip
wojak_scream.webp
 
Fellas, never simp. Even if you're smarter than everyone and admired by women all over the globe. Don't simp. Ever. Even for your own wife and daughters. Women are women. You don't have to hate, but you mustn't ever simp. You might as well important millions of blacks and browns into white countries and then be surprised when the quality of life turns to shit.
 
yeah we're gonna get sued soon and if i can't fundraise it i'm shutting off the site.
Has something already came your way? That seems surprising to me because he's still continuing to not only use the farms but as I said in another post his last two videos he showed who posted what he was using in the videos too. If anything I assumed he was attempting to make good on the criticism he received from you and others. Unless this is in regards to something else involving a suit. I'd really hope Tom isn't retarded enough to sue you.

I defended Tom against Rowan and others but I never held blame to you for platforming them and interviewing. It would be so retarded to get mad at that. This is Kiwi fucking Farms. It's all about entertainment and laughing at internet shit. If Tom had went to you for an interview you'd have interviewed him as well. And if Tom is going to sue you over this, that would be the thing that changes my opinion of him far more than the shit claimed against him by these women.

If fundraising begins for this, I'll do what I can. I said before in another comment on the farms birthday but I respect you immensely for what you've gone through to keep this place running and the idea of it going down over this is insane. And I know this is gay as shit to say. But I've been online long enough to see people like moot abandon 4chan once the internet quit being free speech centered, and hotwheels becoming a giant faggot going on a tour about what a naughty boy he was for making 8chan.

TLDR: Niggas need to cut Null some slack. Yall are taking this as some gay gender wars shit. The men against the women. That is retarded. Remember where you're at.
 
The average man is not getting any pussy these days, despite his best efforts.
Wat

It doesn't make sense for Null to get shit for this. I'm pretty sure he said he wasn't going to feature the thread until the claims seemed more credible, so then people said he was sweeping for Tom.
I agree. He confirmed that they had a relationship with the Turkey, gave them an opportunity to tell their story which these situations are very often a he said/she said thing. Unfortunately, they used this opportunity to frame a lover's quarrel as sexual abuse, it was their deceit not Null's.

I think that if there is a lesson to be learned here from Null's position, if someone is going to allege *specific* deviant behaviors, get concrete evidence of the individual actually asking for it, instead of running with guilt by association bc Turkey Tom had at least briefly met with that one eGirl who was into loli shit.
 
BPD groupies who were clearly lying
Those are the best ones though, and you really ought to mind your manners :crocodile:
Just look at every foidterview joshi has ever done: Only ONE of them didn't end with total beepeedee self destruction, it's funny and should happen MORE.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with letting dumb idiots pull out their own rope to hang themselves with and I'm tired of pretending otherwise.
 
Its wild that all it takes to send them into a tailspin is to just give women the same leeway you'd give anyone else. I can't imagine what it's like to go through life automatically assuming half the population are liars and manipulators who want nothing but the worst for you. It must be tiresome.
You gender wars types are cancer no matter what site you’re on.

Null enabling you people was something awful.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole