Explain to me what this guy did to get shot 10+ times in the back, most of which occurred when he was already dead on the ground. I'll wait.
I will actually give you an answer in good faith and without memes. I will attempt to show the general
legality of the situation, not the morality.
From current evidence: the suspect's gun went off after being taken by an officer (because SIG did a SIG most likely based off of current evidence), another officer(s), not knowing if they guy either actually had that gun or a different one, reacted accordingly. Additionally, there is no limited to how many times you can shoot someone. In fact it's quite the opposite, you are meant to fire upon a threat until they are no longer a threat, with the only consideration being taking into account what's behind the suspect if you can. Every piece of training looks to have been followed with maybe the singular possibility of the officer who took the weapon possibly not communicating he's retrieved it properly to everyone involved.
This is no different from a nigga getting shot after reaching, even if they had no actual weapon. The
reasonable assumption is one of the highest levels of defense for an officer (or citizen) conceived through law and SCOTUS. The suspect was offensive in manner, resisting arrest, and clearly to at least some officers had weapon(s). Even on it's own, him being armed and refusing to comply would be enough to be a legally good shoot in a large amount of scenarios. The fact that officers were willing to fight him until a gunshot is an great indicator of their thought process and intent showing they did not want to kill the suspect. The few seconds between the gun being retrieved and it going off is basically inane to be judged on in such a high adrenaline life-or-death situation, like most other police shootings. Can these split second decisions be
factually wrong? Yes. Are the majority of them
reasonably wrong? No. This is why investigations and courts dealing with shootings don't take foresight or even the broader picture into account, both for officers and for citizens.
I know people are mocking you, but I genuinely hope this came across as educative. If you have any questions I'll try to answer tomorrow since I have the flu right now. If you genuinely want a good education on the matter that is also entertaining, I'd suggest watching some Donut Operator, especially since he does also cover the occasional bad shoot and compares/contrasts responses from a LEO training perspective.
