N A R U v2 wants to enforce the forum rules

[N A R U v2]

Give me your resume of the things that make you think that you're important and the reasons why you think you deserve to have a lot of attention.

I don't.

No one cares enough to dox you, how many times do you have to be told
You're Not Important!
No one cares enough about you to dox you. There are like 6 people in this thread interacting with you. You're not on the level of The Quartering, Razorfist, or Tim Pool or who ever you like to repost videos about.

But I also don't think people like you deserve internet anonymity.

 

[Butwhythough2]

But I also don't think people like you deserve internet anonymity

Tell me why you do? It's rules for me and not for thee. Kill yourself.

 

[Begemot]

AS can be expected of a man who wears thongs.

Well, yes. I know possessing a theory of mind is beyond you but this isn't an insult to me. I'd rather wear thongs than have Euthenasia death squads in my health care system.

 

[N A R U v2]

Tell me why you do? It's rules for me and not for thee.

That's a laughably awful take. No, I don't think you deserve internet anonymity because you celebrate the doxxing of others.

It's not rules for thee but not for me, it's equal justice.

Now, if it were up to me, I'd just as soon say "we already have sex offender databases and legal requirements for them to self-identify to their neighbours, so let's just create doxxer databases and require those who dox others to use government issued mugshots and their full legal name online", but I'm a nobody undeserving of much attention, and so we'll likely just have to settle for everyone being punished for the actions of the few like you.

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

But of course, I already have next to no digital footprint, and I don't interact with much of anyone out of personal preference, and so I'll be one of the least affected by the revocation of internet anonymity because our governments want to "think of the children".

It's your right to lose, buddy.

Well, yes. I know possessing a theory of mind is beyond you but this isn't an insult to me. I'd rather wear thongs than have Euthenasia death squads in my health care system.

And being told you're a nobody is not much of an insult to the misanthropic.

Insults to thee but not to me.

Kill yourself.

After you, madamoiselle.

 

[Begemot]

And being told you're a nobody is not much of an insult to the misanthropic.

Insults to thee but not to me.



After you, madamoiselle.

I don't think you're a nobody. I think you desperately need a psych evaluation.

 

[N A R U v2]

I don't think you're a nobody. I think you desperately need a psych evaluation.

This is coming from the Australian who celebrated Kiwi farms appearing in a local news paper because Null refused to cooperate with the new Zealand authorities regarding a terrorist attack carried out by a fellow Australian.

Rules for thee but not for me.

Kill yourself.

 

[Begemot]

This is coming from the Australian who celebrated Kiwi farms appearing in a local news paper because Null refused to cooperate with the new Zealand authorities regarding a terrorist attack carried out by a fellow Australian.

Rules for thee but not for me.

Where did I celebrate this? I commented on the situation, adding context, not glorifying in it. You are once again being disingenuous.

 

[N A R U v2]

Where did I celebrate this? I commented on the situation, adding context, not glorifying in it. You are once again being disingenuous.

You posted it in a thread dedicated to celebrating mentions of Kiwi farms in local news outlets.

What did you mean by this behaviour? Shaming those who reported on Null's behaviour? Were you impartially observing the negative impact Kiwi farms has had on the world?

What was your reasoning? I'm intrigued.

 

[Butwhythough2]

Where did I celebrate this? I commented on the situation, adding context, not glorifying in it. You are once again being disingenuous.

There's no reason to take anything he says in good faith, so just make fun of him.

@N A R U v2 by your logic, you're complicit with the New Zealand attack because you are a member of the forum, that the owner refused to cooperate with the New Zealand authorities. We can play the guilt by association game too, retard.

 

[N A R U v2]

There's no reason to take anything he says in good faith, so just make fun of him

That's what Spawn of Totoro's gaggle of sycophants had to say about my warnings regarding the mrna bloodclot headshots too.

... Froggy? Is that you?

 

[Begemot]

You posted it in a thread dedicated to celebrating mentions of Kiwi farms in local news outlets.

What did you mean by this behaviour? Shaming those who reported on Null's behaviour? Were you impartially observing the negative impact Kiwi farms has had on the world?

What was your reasoning? I'm intrigued.

If I thought you were able to operate in good faith, as @Butwhythough2 stated I would explain. The problem is you've created a hellish miasma of conspiracies and delusions and you can't escape. You legit think I'm a WEF agent and I don't think I can help you at this stage.

 

[N A R U v2]

You legit think I'm a WEF agent and I don't think I can help you at this stage.

No, that's just a flight of fancy you've told yourself so many times that you've begun to believe it.

@N A R U v2 by your logic, you're complicit with the New Zealand attack because you are a member of the forum, that the owner refused to cooperate with the New Zealand authorities. We can play the guilt by association game too, retard.

Not very well it seems.

I never said you don't deserve internet anonymity because you use this website.

I said you don't deserve internet anonymity because you celebrate this website being used to dox others.

 

[Begemot]

Not very well it seems.

I never said you don't deserve internet anonymity because you use this website.

I said you don't deserve internet anonymity because you celebrate this website being used to dox others.

Nobody here does that. Your guilt by association blandishments try to enforce that by insane logic.

 

[N A R U v2]

Nobody here does that. Your guilt by association blandishments try to enforce that by insane logic.

No, I'm pretty sure he said I'm simply not important enough to warrant doxxing.

Which is an admission of support for doxxing by omission.

Unless you meant to refer to the thread created by @Null encouraging the users of this forum to refer to doxxing by any other name so as to appease his lawyers' demands regarding the increasing illegality of behaviour known as doxxing.

 

[Butwhythough2]

I said you don't deserve internet anonymity because you celebrate this website being used to dox others.

Show me where I celebrate doxing. I said it happens, there are members of the site that dox, a majority don't as they're just interested in the gossip and drama. I don't dox. I take a neutral stance.

 

[N A R U v2]

Show me where I celebrate doxing. I said it happens, there are members of the site that dox, a majority don't as they're just interested in the gossip and drama. I don't dox. I take a neutral stance.

Then I trust you also take a neutral stance to losing your rights to internet anonymity.

 

[LoverofPi]

Put a stake in him, boys. The pi is overdone, and if he hasn't started formulating an attempt at grovelling by now, he's not going to have enough time to create a convincing enough set of arguments to convince me to stay after his first 5 fall flat.

You're stupider than I had anticipated if you expected me to argue for you to stay.
I don't negotiate with toddlers throwing tantrums.

 

[Butwhythough2]

Sorry for the doublepost

That's what Spawn of Totoro's gaggle of sycophants had to say about my warnings regarding the mrna bloodclot headshots too.

... Froggy? Is that you?

This is why people say you're delusional and create conspiracies against you. I've never heard of any of those people, but they came to the same conclusion that I and many others have. To make fun of you.

 

[N A R U v2]

You're stupider than I had anticipated if you expected me to argue for you to stay.
I don't negotiate with toddlers throwing tantrums.

No, I was fairly certain you wouldn't. Which is fine by me!

I'm jumping ship before I'm required to submit my government id for my presence here.

What you do from here is your prerogative.

 

[Butwhythough2]

Then I trust you also take a neutral stance to losing your rights to internet anonymity.

There's a huge difference between individuals finding other individuals information and tying it to their real life, and the government doing it. Do you want some glow nigger finding out your information?