Official Kiwi Farms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

The "it's only brown men!!" reply is a fruitless endeavor. Countries with virtually no brown people, like South Korea, are still plagued by rabid feminists who do in fact criticize Islam all the time. This is just like third position people after the Charlie Kirk shooting, thinking they're safe because "I am not zionist", when the other side gives zero shits and collectively punishes the perceived enemy class with no distinctions.
Wyświetl załącznik 8027065
There are more than zero white rapists and domestic abusers, though. The basic problem is they lack any ability to reason coherently about individuals and groups. A man kidnaps a girl and rapes her? All men are to blame. The other 165 million men in America didn't properly educate him to not kidnap & rape. A woman murdered her own children? That says nothing about women as a whole. Negroes rape at much higher rates than whites? Says nothing about negroes.

What you have to understand that, for the most part, women don't reason at all. That is, they don't mentally evaluate whether or not an idea makes logical sense, is consistent with other things they hold true, etc. A woman's first filter for an idea is, "How does this make me feel?" If it makes her sad or angry, she rejects it. Next filter is, "Is this associated with high status or low status?" Saying men are bad is high-status behavior. Saying negro men are bad is low-status behavior.

- Right to Vote

I've been on this board a few years now. I've asked repeatedly to name a single way our government is more effective at executing its basic duties of securing the homeland and keeping the peace thanks to women voting. Seriously, name one positive outcome that would not have occurred if only men voted. Nobody who supports universal suffrage has ever given me an answer!
 
What you have to understand that, for the most part, women don't reason at all. That is, they don't mentally evaluate whether or not an idea makes logical sense, is consistent with other things they hold true, etc. A woman's first filter for an idea is, "How does this make me feel?" If it makes her sad or angry, she rejects it. Next filter is, "Is this associated with high status or low status?" Saying men are bad is high-status behavior. Saying negro men are bad is low-status behavior.
I don't believe this is true, actually. I certainly believe that women are more susceptible to feelings than men, but I think that the primary factor towards what women believe is popularity. Women can't protect themselves because they're too physically weak, so they depend on others to keep them safe. (Incidentally, they also contribute nothing to society and demand others do all the work for them) They thus have to appeal to people to protect and care for them, which is hard to do if their ideas are wildly out of sync with the group's ideas. Thus, they accept whatever is most popular at the moment, regardless of whether it's true or not. They don't think "Is this correct? Does this align with what I know?" They think "Will others be okay with me saying this is correct?" Because misandry and negro worship are in vogue right now, it's what all women believe, unless they happen to live in a more conservative community. Women always believe the same things as everyone else around them. This is yet another reason they can't be trusted to vote.
 
I mostly drop by for the irrelevant topics, so here's my woman hate thread tax:

The women's section in the trains in my country appear to be worse than the men's. It's just as crowded as the men's section and every time I see that shit in rush hour, everyone is so bitchy and angry at everyone else. In the unsegregated section of the train, even when it's jampacked like were headed to Auschwitz or something, there's always laughter and a light hearted attitude at the absolute state of it all.

I used to go to class with this girl. One year, she would ride in the women's section, the following year when she was my classmate again, I noticed she started riding with me at the train. When asked, she said the situation (crowding) was just as bad, but at least there wasn't any bitching around.

The government literally made a safe space for them and they proceeded to turn it into a hell of their own making.

And one more thing. The women's coach is closer to the station exit and it's only 1/3 the coaches of the train. Somehow, their line at the exit ALWAYS finishes slowly compared to the unsegregated section.

Why? The ladies are always fiddling with their tickets and not inserting it correctly. This was back in the time when cards have to be inserted facing the right way to get accepted by the gate.
Replying to my own post from 2 years ago, because for once, I decided to not be a misogynist. I looked at the line out of the station and noticed a line with mostly women in it, but it was less than half as long. Surely this line would be faster? About 10 years ago, the trains transitioned(lol) to tickets that don't need to be inserted, but the foid infested line still finished behind the mostly male line.

HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? Like there was probably three men that would go through the gate for every one woman.
 
The government literally made a safe space for them and they proceeded to turn it into a hell of their own making.
Thanks for bringing back all the horrible memories from the public transport. Imagine it's 7PM, tons of working men are sitting in silence and misery, suddenly two cuntoids board the train in some station and start loudly gossiping to each other so the whole car can hear about their bullshit first world problems. Wimmin ☕

Do wimminz who go to the common area in your country also do the fashion show/whorehouse strut before taking a seat? Like, calm down bitch, you don't need to shake your ass and walk with attitude, you're on the Fuckassville public transport, not Paris gala. Asking this because I'm just trying to nootice patterns??

About 10 years ago, the trains transitioned(lol) to tickets that don't need to be inserted
Yup, when I was in highschool the public buses switched to this RFID-style ticket that you could charge from the city council's website. You would then just hold it in front of sensor -> Beep -> Toll paid

90% of the time when the bus driver had to argue with a passenger to use the fucking ticket properly, they were from a certain gender, I wonder why 🤔

Really want to know what goes on in the mind of such vaginiggers, are they used to breezing through life thanks to simps so much that the thought of having to pay for a bus ride preplexes them? Or just like how wimmin don't understand civil society, they are literally incapable of understanding how trade in a society works?
 
19% of women voted for the NSDAP; 22% of men did. Women weren't the deciding factor in the election.
"The Nazis continued to increase their electoral support between 1930 and July 1932, making more headway among female voters than among male, with the result that in those Protestant areas where men's and women's votes were counted separately in July 1932 the Nazis received a marginally larger share of the total female than of the total male vote, while in Catholic areas the difference between the shares of the male and female vote going to the Nazis narrowed. These trends continued to the March 1933 election when the NSDAP received a noticeably larger share of the female than of the male vote in Protestant areas ...

If this pattern was repeated throughout the Reich, where 64.1% of the population was classed as Protestant in the census on June 16, 1925, then it would appear that by July 1932 there was very little difference in the shares of the total male and female votes going to the NSDAP, with the Nazis receiving more actual votes from women than from men, given that more women than men were eligible to vote. By March 1933 the NSDAP received a larger share of the female than of the male vote ..."
-
Helen Boak, "Our Last Hope"; Women's Votes for Hitler: A Reappraisal (German Studies Review: Vol. 12, No. 2 (May, 1989), pp. 289-310)
 
Hating women? Idk man, sounds kind of gay.
1760671119531.gif
YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
 
"The Nazis continued to increase their electoral support between 1930 and July 1932, making more headway among female voters than among male, with the result that in those Protestant areas where men's and women's votes were counted separately in July 1932 the Nazis received a marginally larger share of the total female than of the total male vote, while in Catholic areas the difference between the shares of the male and female vote going to the Nazis narrowed. These trends continued to the March 1933 election when the NSDAP received a noticeably larger share of the female than of the male vote in Protestant areas ...

If this pattern was repeated throughout the Reich, where 64.1% of the population was classed as Protestant in the census on June 16, 1925, then it would appear that by July 1932 there was very little difference in the shares of the total male and female votes going to the NSDAP, with the Nazis receiving more actual votes from women than from men, given that more women than men were eligible to vote. By March 1933 the NSDAP received a larger share of the female than of the male vote ..."
-
Helen Boak, "Our Last Hope"; Women's Votes for Hitler: A Reappraisal (German Studies Review: Vol. 12, No. 2 (May, 1989), pp. 289-310)
The authors arguing the record shows a female advantage show about 3%-4%. So it wouldn't have really changed the overall outcome (not that Hitler becoming Chancellor worked out well for Germany, did get a whole generation of German men killed, though).
 
i know you just cited well-backed statistics and made profound observations about female behavior but you're just a chud so faggot remarks somehow negate everything you've said and are far more insightful despite turning whatever conversation to be had into a shit-flinging contest where anyone would reasonably backhand whoever makes such remarks

Really, it is amazing when you realize women are just faggots. You wouldn't tolerate a guy acting like that around you, but you do women because they're women. You allow them to get away with their retardation because they are retarded. You don't say or do anything because you know they can't help themselves, even if you don't think they really are. And doing one of the aforementioned two will get some other dumbass enabling said retard mad.

"Leave the retarded faggot alone! If he wants to munch crayons and gurggle on your dime, there's nothing you should do about it! He's a retarded faggot."

And then said dumbass can't explain the consequences behind their enabling
 
1760682056046.png

Oh well....

Really, it is amazing when you realize women are just faggots. You wouldn't tolerate a guy acting like that around you, but you do women because they're women. You allow them to get away with their retardation because they are retarded. You don't say or do anything because you know they can't help themselves, even if you don't think they really are. And doing one of the aforementioned two will get some other dumbass enabling said retard mad.
Women don't bar the standards we don't even have. It's like kid eating dirt or dog eating shit like it's the best cake on planet.
If you stop them, they look at you perplexed, like what is wrong with you. It's even worse if you are in public like you mentioned. There's always another retard trying to save a hoe.

That is why it is a mistake to not let women be burdened with children, pets and household. "Idle maids are the devil's foids"

Realistically, when you say women are just faggots, it's the other way around, but that's not as noticeable, as we have gotten accustomed to them. Fags are hated for same things women get away with.
Drama, whoreyness, std superspreaders, bitchiness, demanding a space for them, trying to fuck up everything and put their hands on kids, my body my rights, being naked in public and so on...
They only fail in divorces and that's because nobody want's them in the first place, otherwise I'm sure they would be around there.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Oh man, I'm so sick of women. Ever hear this one? "Not everything needs a solution".

I hate it so much. They will literally tell you outright - this problem I'm moaning about? Don't try to solve it. What they apparently want is "compassion", and saying stuff like "it's OK".

It's so crazy to me. They get mad at you for trying to sort things out, why? Is it because the answers are often obvious or straightforward, and it makes them insecure or feel stupid for not trying them? Is it because the problem isn't even real in the first place, and they just want to whinge?
 
Oh man, I'm so sick of women. Ever hear this one? "Not everything needs a solution".

I hate it so much. They will literally tell you outright - this problem I'm moaning about? Don't try to solve it. What they apparently want is "compassion", and saying stuff like "it's OK".

It's so crazy to me. They get mad at you for trying to sort things out, why? Is it because the answers are often obvious or straightforward, and it makes them insecure or feel stupid for not trying them? Is it because the problem isn't even real in the first place, and they just want to whinge?
half of the shit women say is just b8
>whaaa im so fat and ugly
why dont u lose some weight?
>whaaa you dont find me attractive!

equals

>tell me im pretty
no
>whaaaaaa
 
In that scenario you just shut your brain AND go yes darling. Maybe reflect back to her if you have some time to waste.
Yesterday a woman wanted to reheat some za back at work. We have some shitty electric oven and a normal microwave. I shut my mainsplanning mouth and saw how the girl ended with some soggy ass pizza. Oh well...
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole