- Dołączono
- 2 Wrz 2025
a man has to choose between understanding women and liking themYou can teach a man to understand women.
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
a man has to choose between understanding women and liking themYou can teach a man to understand women.
There are more than zero white rapists and domestic abusers, though. The basic problem is they lack any ability to reason coherently about individuals and groups. A man kidnaps a girl and rapes her? All men are to blame. The other 165 million men in America didn't properly educate him to not kidnap & rape. A woman murdered her own children? That says nothing about women as a whole. Negroes rape at much higher rates than whites? Says nothing about negroes.The "it's only brown men!!" reply is a fruitless endeavor. Countries with virtually no brown people, like South Korea, are still plagued by rabid feminists who do in fact criticize Islam all the time. This is just like third position people after the Charlie Kirk shooting, thinking they're safe because "I am not zionist", when the other side gives zero shits and collectively punishes the perceived enemy class with no distinctions.
Wyświetl załącznik 8027065
- Right to Vote
I don't believe this is true, actually. I certainly believe that women are more susceptible to feelings than men, but I think that the primary factor towards what women believe is popularity. Women can't protect themselves because they're too physically weak, so they depend on others to keep them safe. (Incidentally, they also contribute nothing to society and demand others do all the work for them) They thus have to appeal to people to protect and care for them, which is hard to do if their ideas are wildly out of sync with the group's ideas. Thus, they accept whatever is most popular at the moment, regardless of whether it's true or not. They don't think "Is this correct? Does this align with what I know?" They think "Will others be okay with me saying this is correct?" Because misandry and negro worship are in vogue right now, it's what all women believe, unless they happen to live in a more conservative community. Women always believe the same things as everyone else around them. This is yet another reason they can't be trusted to vote.What you have to understand that, for the most part, women don't reason at all. That is, they don't mentally evaluate whether or not an idea makes logical sense, is consistent with other things they hold true, etc. A woman's first filter for an idea is, "How does this make me feel?" If it makes her sad or angry, she rejects it. Next filter is, "Is this associated with high status or low status?" Saying men are bad is high-status behavior. Saying negro men are bad is low-status behavior.
Replying to my own post from 2 years ago, because for once, I decided to not be a misogynist. I looked at the line out of the station and noticed a line with mostly women in it, but it was less than half as long. Surely this line would be faster? About 10 years ago, the trains transitioned(lol) to tickets that don't need to be inserted, but the foid infested line still finished behind the mostly male line.I mostly drop by for the irrelevant topics, so here's my woman hate thread tax:
The women's section in the trains in my country appear to be worse than the men's. It's just as crowded as the men's section and every time I see that shit in rush hour, everyone is so bitchy and angry at everyone else. In the unsegregated section of the train, even when it's jampacked like were headed to Auschwitz or something, there's always laughter and a light hearted attitude at the absolute state of it all.
I used to go to class with this girl. One year, she would ride in the women's section, the following year when she was my classmate again, I noticed she started riding with me at the train. When asked, she said the situation (crowding) was just as bad, but at least there wasn't any bitching around.
The government literally made a safe space for them and they proceeded to turn it into a hell of their own making.
And one more thing. The women's coach is closer to the station exit and it's only 1/3 the coaches of the train. Somehow, their line at the exit ALWAYS finishes slowly compared to the unsegregated section.
Why? The ladies are always fiddling with their tickets and not inserting it correctly. This was back in the time when cards have to be inserted facing the right way to get accepted by the gate.
That's high status vs low statusbut I think that the primary factor towards what women believe is popularity.
Thanks for bringing back all the horrible memories from the public transport. Imagine it's 7PM, tons of working men are sitting in silence and misery, suddenly two cuntoids board the train in some station and start loudly gossiping to each other so the whole car can hear about their bullshit first world problems. WimminThe government literally made a safe space for them and they proceeded to turn it into a hell of their own making.
Yup, when I was in highschool the public buses switched to this RFID-style ticket that you could charge from the city council's website. You would then just hold it in front of sensor -> Beep -> Toll paidAbout 10 years ago, the trains transitioned(lol) to tickets that don't need to be inserted
I maintain that choice is very much made for them and they have no say in it whether they like it or not. I know I sure as shit had no say in it. I liked women, but God had different plans.a man has to choose between understanding women and liking them
Hitler would not have come to power without overwhelming support from women voters. If that happened, millions of socialists likely would have otherwise survived the 1940s.Seriously, name one positive outcome that would not have occurred if only men voted.
19% of women voted for the NSDAP; 22% of men did. Women weren't the deciding factor in the election.Hitler would not have come to power without overwhelming support from women voters. If that happened, millions of socialists likely would have otherwise survived the 1940s.
"The Nazis continued to increase their electoral support between 1930 and July 1932, making more headway among female voters than among male, with the result that in those Protestant areas where men's and women's votes were counted separately in July 1932 the Nazis received a marginally larger share of the total female than of the total male vote, while in Catholic areas the difference between the shares of the male and female vote going to the Nazis narrowed. These trends continued to the March 1933 election when the NSDAP received a noticeably larger share of the female than of the male vote in Protestant areas ...19% of women voted for the NSDAP; 22% of men did. Women weren't the deciding factor in the election.
The authors arguing the record shows a female advantage show about 3%-4%. So it wouldn't have really changed the overall outcome (not that Hitler becoming Chancellor worked out well for Germany, did get a whole generation of German men killed, though)."The Nazis continued to increase their electoral support between 1930 and July 1932, making more headway among female voters than among male, with the result that in those Protestant areas where men's and women's votes were counted separately in July 1932 the Nazis received a marginally larger share of the total female than of the total male vote, while in Catholic areas the difference between the shares of the male and female vote going to the Nazis narrowed. These trends continued to the March 1933 election when the NSDAP received a noticeably larger share of the female than of the male vote in Protestant areas ...
If this pattern was repeated throughout the Reich, where 64.1% of the population was classed as Protestant in the census on June 16, 1925, then it would appear that by July 1932 there was very little difference in the shares of the total male and female votes going to the NSDAP, with the Nazis receiving more actual votes from women than from men, given that more women than men were eligible to vote. By March 1933 the NSDAP received a larger share of the female than of the male vote ..."
-Helen Boak, "Our Last Hope"; Women's Votes for Hitler: A Reappraisal (German Studies Review: Vol. 12, No. 2 (May, 1989), pp. 289-310)
The authors arguing the record shows a female advantage show about 3%-4%. So it wouldn't have really changed the overall outcome (not that Hitler becoming Chancellor worked out well for Germany, did get a whole generation of German men killed, though).
Women don't bar the standards we don't even have. It's like kid eating dirt or dog eating shit like it's the best cake on planet.Really, it is amazing when you realize women are just faggots. You wouldn't tolerate a guy acting like that around you, but you do women because they're women. You allow them to get away with their retardation because they are retarded. You don't say or do anything because you know they can't help themselves, even if you don't think they really are. And doing one of the aforementioned two will get some other dumbass enabling said retard mad.
Are you from the past? No seriously this post is straight out of 2009.
half of the shit women say is just b8Oh man, I'm so sick of women. Ever hear this one? "Not everything needs a solution".
I hate it so much. They will literally tell you outright - this problem I'm moaning about? Don't try to solve it. What they apparently want is "compassion", and saying stuff like "it's OK".
It's so crazy to me. They get mad at you for trying to sort things out, why? Is it because the answers are often obvious or straightforward, and it makes them insecure or feel stupid for not trying them? Is it because the problem isn't even real in the first place, and they just want to whinge?