US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Neoliberalism calls for arraying oppressed classes against the core population so as to undermine society. Since no one is really oppressed in the USA, classes of artificial victims must be created. The newest one consists of people whose self-images center on being obese — I mean fat (archive):
1755963365932.webp
In the world of fat activism, the “O-words”—overweight and obesity—are expressly verboten. That’s because advocates and “fat studies” scholars want to destigmatize and accommodate fatness—their preferred term—and push back against the view that overweight or obese people are somehow abnormal or diseased.

To be obese is by definition abnormal. Obesity is recognized as a disease by the American Medical Association. It is associated with many other diseases, including coronary heart disease, hypertension, high cholesterol, dyslipidemia, heart attacks, heart failure, stroke, diabetes, osteoarthritis, gallstones, liver problems, endometrial cancer, postmenopausal breast cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, kidney disease, apnea, asthma, psoriasis, reflux, mood disorders, and incontinence. Consequently, it is correlated with reduced life expectancy.
1755963524086.webp
Now a third problematic O-word has emerged: Ozempic.

Fat activists do not like Ozempic because it helps people lose weight, which from their perspective is counterproductive.

Meanwhile,
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently estimated that obesity is associated with approximately $385 billion in health spending in 2024. According to a recent paper in JAMA, employees with obesity have seven times the medical claims costs and 11 times the indemnity claims costs of those with a healthy weight. They file twice as many worker compensation claims. …

According to a 2023 paper in the journal Nature, roughly 8% of all medical expenditures in the U.S. are associated with the treatment of obesity.
1755963603443.webp 1755963694856.webp

But to acknowledge all this is to commit stigmatization, which academia regards as thoughtcrime.

Fat studies, an interdisciplinary field that arose in the 1990s, focuses on what it calls “weight-based oppression”…

No wonder so many lardass creatures want Democrats to force others to pay off their student loans. It can’t be easy to secure gainful employment with a degree in fat studies.

Like ethnic studies and queer studies, fat studies was inspired by activism and organized around identity, incorporating aspects of social sciences, the arts and the humanities. In the language of fat studies, to “fatten” an issue means to examine it through the lens of the fat justice movement.
1755963809937.webp

There is no shortage of shitlibs whose heads have undergone fattening.
 
Where neoliberalism prevails, everything else is crowded out. Before long, there will be no standards at all in academia except DEI shitlibbery. Students will be accepted to college who cannot even read and write, so long as they check correct identity group boxes. University of Connecticut is already there:
https://xcancel.com/MissVega8888/status/1958894654767718408
Wyświetl załącznik 78192935wCxSp-QrDhVmZxW.mp4
Make all student loans and federal scholarships contingent on and available size proportional to an IQ test administered in English, with availability starting at 115.
 
Make all student loans and federal scholarships contingent on and available size proportional to an IQ test administered in English, with availability starting at 115.
You can't do that for the same reason you can't do a competency test for hiring people. Anything that has disparate outcomes -- that is to say, if you're not hiring X+ percent of niggers and Y+ percent of women, where X and Y are the demographics in your area, then you are BY DEFINITION, CODIFIED IN LAW, guilty of a heckin' racism and sexism, and you get the shit sued out of you forever.

It doesn't matter if you just got a bunch of male applicants. If you're not at least 50% female, the ONLY POSSIBLE LEGAL CONCLUSION is that you're sexist and bigoted against women. It doesn't matter if you're doing tech work that requires a high IQ and specialized skills. The ONLY POSSIBLE REASON you're not hiring at least 15% black people is that you're racist and discriminating against them. Tabula Rasa -- a theory that's the cornerstone of leftist thought but has been discredited for CENTURIES -- states clearly that people are fungible exchangeable economic units and can be slotted in and out at will, so the only reason not to have the preferred ones -- women and blacks -- is that you have a preference against them, and freedom of association doesn't exist in the US anymore.

Note the plus sign, too. No one cares if you're hiring 80% women executives and as many black people that you can get through the door. No one cares about racism against whites or sexism against men. That's how you know it's not really about racism or sexism. It's about punishing the majority and damaging the west until it can be shattered across the inflection points and a color revolution can bring "real communism" (tm) to the masses.

The one exception to this is "we require a college degree." College degrees, at least in theory, required a base level of competency. You couldn't be retarded as fuck and get one, so if you demanded one, you filtered out anyone too stupid to get one, when you couldn't otherwise ask them to prove that they're not stupid. The left is just fine with this becuase they control the colleges, which means if you want a job of any merit in the west you have to go through a leftist indoctrination course, lock yourself to forever-debt slavery (while the left syphons every dime it can from you), and even then, if you're a straight white male, they'll use HR consultant firms to filter you out so the company never even sees your resume to apply for it.

And this is before you get into the techbros and boomers ruining everything by outsourcing everything to India and China. I have no idea when this system collapses but I hope to god I survive to see it.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I give it ~2 weeks after the gibs are cut off before we hit full on race war in the US. I doubt it will even be intentional. Jeetcode causing the SNAP / EBT system to crash catastrophically would do it. A economic crash would do it. In both cases our friendly neighborhood white women, jewish saboteurs, and CCP agents would be calling to air lift in food from elsewhere, no matter what they had to do to get it.

But people like your average Tyrone, they aren't the ones going to go hungry first. Not when they can get a gun and there's no consequences for them just rolling up and killing some whypypo and raiding their fridge, or just walking into a store and eating while sitting down in isle 13 threatening anyone reacting with violence, then walking out without paying.

Once the dindus realize there is absolutely no serious response to chimpouts -- friendly DAs will refuse to do anything because of marxist demoralization, terrified mayors and state leadership will refuse to let the police intervene, and even if the police wanted to help it takes them 30-45 minutes to respond and the chimpouts are over by then -- they'll get a taste for it. Once they get a taste for it, the only thing that will stop it is when people get tired of dealing with every store within travel distance from the porch monkeys being raided and bragged about on social media, followed up by porch monkeys and jewish women crying about the injustice of "food deserts" after they've driven literally everyone out of the area. This all ends with vigilantes just randomly shooting into chimpout events, which the usual suspects who got us to this point will scream bloody murder about. "All those poor doctors, nurses, and engineers! Our 75 IQ advantage against China, lost forever!"
We saw a preview of this during the summer of love. Tyrone was only able to loot winebar and shitlib sections of the city. They didn't loot the aeras the local Whites that had firearms ready to go and posses formed.
 
Where neoliberalism prevails, everything else is crowded out. Before long, there will be no standards at all in academia except DEI shitlibbery. Students will be accepted to college who cannot even read and write, so long as they check correct identity group boxes. University of Connecticut is already there:
https://xcancel.com/MissVega8888/status/1958894654767718408
Wyświetl załącznik 78192935wCxSp-QrDhVmZxW.mp4
No fucking way. This makes my blood boil. I’ve known so many people who busted their ass and got all worked up over bullshit GPAs, SATs, ACTs, dual enrollment, whatever other bullshit that dried up white women in their 40s come up with to stress you out and waste your time, all in the hopes of MAYBE getting into college and MAYBE getting a career. Meanwhile as long as you’re a brown ass nigger you don’t have to do anything and you get it all for free. Deport every last one of them.
 
You can't do that for the same reason you can't do a competency test for hiring people. Anything that has disparate outcomes -- that is to say, if you're not hiring X+ percent of niggers and Y+ percent of women, where X and Y are the demographics in your area, then you are BY DEFINITION, CODIFIED IN LAW, guilty of a heckin' racism and sexism, and you get the shit sued out of you forever.

It doesn't matter if you just got a bunch of male applicants. If you're not at least 50% female, the ONLY POSSIBLE REASON is that you're sexist and bigoted against women. It doesn't matter if you're doing tech work that requires a high IQ and specialized skills. The ONLY POSSIBLE REASON you're not hiring at least 15% black people is that you're racist and discriminating against them. Tabula Rasa -- a theory that's the cornerstone of leftist thought but has been discredited for CENTURIES -- states clearly that people are fungible exchangeable economic units and can be slotted in and out at will, so the only reason not to have the preferred ones -- women and blacks -- is that you have a preference against them, and freedom of association doesn't exist in the US anymore.

Note the plus sign, too. No one cares if you're hiring 80% women executives and as many black people that you can get through the door. No one cares about racism against whites or sexism against men. That's how you know it's not really about racism or sexism. It's about punishing the majority and damaging the west until it can be shattered across the inflection points and a color revolution can bring "real communism" (tm) to the masses.
A man can dream. And give it time. I don't think the current supreme Court will be as favorable to that precedent as they have in the past. You can only stare at the ability to effectively predict outcomes with a cheap and widely available test and pretend like it doesn't exist.

The supreme court has overturned much more precious rulings to the left recently and this has the added benefit of being good for corporations (in addition to competent people) as well.
 
You can't do that for the same reason you can't do a competency test for hiring people. Anything that has disparate outcomes -- that is to say, if you're not hiring X+ percent of niggers and Y+ percent of women, where X and Y are the demographics in your area, then you are BY DEFINITION, CODIFIED IN LAW, guilty of a heckin' racism and sexism, and you get the shit sued out of you forever.
Disparate impact theory. I humbly offer you the nuke, go HAM.
Tabula Rasa -- a theory that's the cornerstone of leftist thought but has been discredited for CENTURIES -- states clearly that people are fungible exchangeable economic units and can be slotted in and out at will, so the only reason not to have the preferred ones -- women and blacks -- is that you have a preference against them, and freedom of association doesn't exist in the US anymore.
Rosseau and his consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
It's about punishing the majority and damaging the west until it can be shattered across the inflection points and a color revolution can bring "real communism" (tm) to the masses.
TBH, I don't think this is the end goal. They want Chinese "communism," which is capitalism for me, communism for thee, and absolutely zero ideological interests whatsoever. It's all just power grab attempts, and we shouldn't pretend there's an ideology here so we don't get roped into arguing that to people who fundamentally do not care.
 
They've completely lost it, TDS doesn't even cover how bad the Dems and the Lefties hate Trump. If Trump cured cancer today they'd be on the MSM singing the praises of cancer and how awesome it is and how evil it is of Trump to kill it.
Nothing drives this home more than watching libs defend John Bolton. Anyone who has a shred of awareness longer than two days ago should understand how the left has no real coherence by their reaction to John Bolton getting his house raided. Democrats will, without embarrassment, declare Liz Cheney and John Bolton the champions of “our democracy.” I truly believe TDS is a serious mental illness.
haha don,t think dem party be aruond next relaction be aruond short bit. rinos as well
Have you had your aneurysm checked out? You might want to get on that.
 
Griggs v duke power has done more damage to this country than any other court opinion post civil war
 
You can only stare at the ability to effectively predict outcomes with a cheap and widely available test and pretend like it doesn't exist.

The supreme court has overturned much more precious rulings to the left recently and this has the added benefit of being good for corporations (in addition to competent people) as well.
I would caution that I doubt they'd go fully to this, but that's because the more conservative justices would also be aware of not wanting to back-end a technocracy. I wouldn't want IQ testing to get mainstreamed either, but that's because psychology is an absolutely captured discipline that attracts lefties like stink on shit, even at the best of times it has large margins of error by necessity since we humies aren't good research subjects unlike lab rats, and left-wing loons have absolutely tried this with the 2nd Amendment and red flag laws. (Some therapists absolutely will say, "Seeking a gun," is evidence of mental illness, and I absolutely think they'd try to worm their way into the tests and "curate" the results. Don't give an inch.) I doubt they'd go for a full repeal of civil rights legislation, but that's out of an understanding that no one's going to be ready for that and it'd sink the GOP overnight. You want to trigger the libs, but you also want to deprive them of anything to grab onto as well so it's a feckless triggering.

Hence my prognostication that if they touch this, expect more along the lines of kicking disparate impact theory for being an abuse of statistics, (It really is, an -ism is last on the order of operations for explaining a disparate anything, not first, and that whole thing is law whose spirit has an expiration date.) and seeking to roll back law in general without really commenting on what the law should be. That ambiguity is one of the better assets this iteration of the court has. State-deference and explicitly just canning Roe v. Wade practically killed abortion as a wedge issue by 2024 (And obligatory fuck you to Lindsay Graham for raising it like a dipshit in 2022 and being half of the terrible two I blame for the failure to red wave.) by gutting any liberal retorts of, "THEY'S COMIN' FER MAH ABORTIONS!!!"
 
@An Idle Observer
yes, having the court mandate IQ tests or some such shit would be retarded.

best course of action would be to simply declare 'disparate impact' theory and 'affirmative action' type laws unconstitutional, and leave the rest to the legislatures (state and federal)
 
yes, having the court mandate IQ tests or some such shit would be retarded.

best course of action would be to simply declare 'disparate impact' theory and 'affirmative action' type laws unconstitutional, and leave the rest to the legislatures (state and federal)
I'm going that extra measure in saying they probably wouldn't allow an IQ test to be used in hiring or anything like that in general. (I mean that literally, trying to measure IQ is the issue because the courts don't want soyence as a talking point.) Otherwise, that's going to be the best action given civil rights legislation as a premise has enough edge cases to where you wouldn't want to just nuke it all without some safety net.
 
I saw yesterday that Kilmar, the guy with a pending human trafficking trial, got released on a no bond thing. Trump couldn't even keep a piece of shit in El Salvadorian prison. Even after he succeeded at getting him there.

God I hate our clown political leadership.

1755969971136.webp
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Wstecz
Top Na dole