Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) 1 2 3
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
Well I've gotta say that I am actually shocked that he paid the sanction for a lot of reasons (why pay $1500 when you wouldn't pay $1000? Why not take the get-out-of-jail-free-and-don't-get-sanctioned-again card? For that matter why pay the filing fee when you've literally agreed to have no witnesses or evidence?) but I guess I'm just not big brained enough.

But that's not particularly insightful so let's have a fun philosophical question. Is this a win for the nothing-ever-happens bros because the case continues to trundle along like it has for the past 5 years? Or have they been felted because russtard paying the sanction is indeed something happening?
 
But that's not particularly insightful so let's have a fun philosophical question. Is this a win for the nothing-ever-happens bros because the case continues to trundle along like it has for the past 5 years? Or have they been felted because russtard paying the sanction is indeed something happening?
He paid the sanction, but that's just to maintain the status quo and allow nothing to continue happening as the court can not now dismiss the case for his failure to pay. The nothing happens can has been kicked down the way for another 6-12 months minimum.
 
I do wonder if Hardin woke up this morning and decided to wait to file a status report specifically because he expected this sort of fuckery from Greee. An easy way to add to the list of reasons why this case is absurd, but perhaps out of mild annoyance. To comply with what he was instructed to do, Hardin would have had to periodically check to see if a payment was sent until until midnight.... only for the payment to come in close to the deadline, but the next day. Wasting the opposition's time and money certainly seems vexatious to me.

Hardin probably knew a payment was coming because he probably spent the past week trying to walk Greeee through the process of a wire transfer, only for Greeee to act intentionally and actually retarded, before giving up and settling on the paypal adjacent option.
 
He paid the sanction, but that's just to maintain the status quo and allow nothing to continue happening as the court can not now dismiss the case for his failure to pay. The nothing happens can has been kicked down the way for another 6-12 months minimum.
Stocks in $NOTHING are through the roof! BUY BUY BUY!
 
Now what's going to be interesting is the next round of sanctions, when we'll presumably be much closer to one or both of "can't pay" and "won't pay".
 
I used Xoom alot when I lived overseas and needed cash, it's Paypal's own wire transfer/remittance competitor to Moneygram and Western Union so he can't reverse it.
Sounds expensive. I wonder what Greeee did with any fees? He wanted Null/Hardin to pay for copy fees for transcripts. I can't imagine he ate a Western Union sized money fee.
 
Congrats on getting the money Null.

I don't have much to add other than to observe that this case is older than my son, who can now play quite a decent game of chess.
 
Sounds expensive. I wonder what Greeee did with any fees? He wanted Null/Hardin to pay for copy fees for transcripts. I can't imagine he ate a Western Union sized money fee.
That was my thought too. Is it possible to ticky-box for 'recipient pays fees' when sending money via Xoom? Because I can see Russ absolutely doing that.
 
Distinctly lacking any of his usual piss whining, he did not want to file this lmao
Why is he unable to put his fucking exhibits on the same page as the exhibit number, is that the correct format?
He has seen other people do it so he repeats it, but he does not know why they do it that way.

There's not really a "correct format" for exhibits, but using a spacer page in your document is is an easy way to add the exhibit number and then you can insert something from a separate file even if it's a PDF or JPG without having to edit it. An upside with this is that the references in Word can be dynamic, so for example you can change the numbering system or reorder them and your document automatically updates.

If you're going to insert something directly into the document that is not the size of a full page anyway, like the short screenshots Greer loves, then you might as well put it right below the heading instead of having of a full-page spacer.

I think Hardin adds his little exhibit number "stickers" as PDF annotations.
 
I genuinely forgot there's a copyright case still going on
That he is not allowed to call any witnesses or present any evidence for.

At the moment, his only paths of advancement are:
  • Obtain and produce an RO application that is completely irrelevant to the case at his own cost, because he's a malding little child who blurted out that it was relevant in a fit of drooling rage. If this is ever addressed 🌈, Mr Hardin can weaponise whatever useful details are in there, as well as motion for more sanctions because it has fuck all to do with copyright claims. (Ironically, having 0 relevance to copyright has been Shitlips' 'defence' whenever Mr Hardin has unearthed evidence of his misconduct.)
  • Serve 2 anons
  • Potentially be on the hook for a fresh wave of sanctions that are currently being considered for various Greeetarded fuckery
 
Is this a win for the nothing-ever-happens bros because the case continues to trundle along like it has for the past 5 years? Or have they been felted because russtard paying the sanction is indeed something happening?
If he had not paid up, the case would have been dismissed (or so the judge says). Therefore that would be a loss for NEH bros.
If he paid up -as he did- then the case would trog along. The paying up is by itself a happening, and the trogging is a pathway for more happenings.

Therefore, either way, NEH bros lose.
Sounds expensive. I wonder what Greeee did with any fees? He wanted Null/Hardin to pay for copy fees for transcripts. I can't imagine he ate a Western Union sized money fee.
His exhibit shows that Mr. Hardin received every cent, therefore Greer ate all the fees.
 
Is Greer actually allowed to self-adjust the payment amount and deduct the 225-odd dollars himself? Or is that something that would typically require prior approval or agreement? Or would it have been more appropriate to pay the amount specified by the judge and then let the defense pay the other money at the appropriate time?

I realize that this court is unlikely to do anything about it, but I'm wondering if this is something that's generally acceptable.
 
1755688512801.webp
hmmm ... two hours late ... when have we previously seen greee successfully deploy this tactic?

(ecf 203 from december 2024):
1755689034378.webp
1755689366718.webp
(ecf 230, footnote from the district judge's decision regarding this very sanction, february 2025):
1755690228168.webp
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole