Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
Distinctly lacking any of his usual piss whining, he did not want to file this lmao
My theory is he didn't want Hardin to file a report explicitly pointing out he was late. He was hoping the judge wouldn't scrutinize the exhibit, and if Hardin accuses him of hiding it he can say "no I didn't, it's in the exhibit!"

However, as I have thoroughly argued in other threads, Hardin is still ordered instructed to file a status report anyway. There's no reason for him to leave out the tardiness. When Russ whines about redundant filings, Hardin has a docket order to point to, while Russ doesn't.
 
Lol, he such a damn disaster, he can't do anything right.

I went through a period in life where I was so uptight about being perfect, and also subconsciously rebellious, I'd always deliver late. Without fail, always delivered, always good product, and often not late enough to be objectively wrong or missed, exactly, but still, always late. I'd chalk Russell's chronic failure up to some anxious perfectionism, but we all know it's just spit-in-your-eye recalcitrance and assholery.
 
My theory is he didn't want Hardin to file a report explicitly pointing out he was late. He was hoping the judge wouldn't scrutinize the exhibit, and if Hardin accuses him of hiding it he can say "no I didn't, it's in the exhibit!"

However, as I have thoroughly argued in other threads, Hardin is still ordered instructed to file a status report anyway. There's no reason for him to leave out the tardiness. When Russ whines about redundant filings, Hardin has a docket order to point to, while Russ doesn't.
I do wonder if Hardin woke up this morning and decided to wait to file a status report specifically because he expected this sort of fuckery from Greee. An easy way to add to the list of reasons why this case is absurd, but perhaps out of mild annoyance. To comply with what he was instructed to do, Hardin would have had to periodically check to see if a payment was sent until until midnight.... only for the payment to come in close to the deadline, but the next day. Wasting the opposition's time and money certainly seems vexatious to me.
 
I do wonder if Hardin woke up this morning and decided to wait to file a status report specifically because he expected this sort of fuckery from Greee. An easy way to add to the list of reasons why this case is absurd, but perhaps out of mild annoyance. To comply with what he was instructed to do, Hardin would have had to periodically check to see if a payment was sent until until midnight.... only for the payment to come in close to the deadline, but the next day. Wasting the opposition's time and money certainly seems vexatious to me.
My guess is that Mr. Hardin is simply waiting to make 100% sure the funds clear. It's easy to file "Failed to pay." But he likely doesn't want to tell the court "we're all good" if the payment somehow fails. If Xoom is operating on the normal EFT/ACH mechanism then it may be a couple days.
 
Lol, he such a damn disaster, he can't do anything right.

I went through a period in life where I was so uptight about being perfect, and also subconsciously rebellious, I'd always deliver late. Without fail, always delivered, always good product, and often not late enough to be objectively wrong or missed, exactly, but still, always late. I'd chalk Russell's chronic failure up to some anxious perfectionism, but we all know it's just spit-in-your-eye recalcitrance and assholery.
This was my thought exactly. He needed some psychic self soothing, so he sent payment late on purpose to spite everyone and make himself feel better.
 
What are the odds Brickface gave him the money in order to keep draining the legal fund and annoy Dear Feeder?
Him paying up increases the chances of other (pending) sanctions not being mooted by case closure. 10th Circuit caselaw says it's not supposed to be mooted, but the judges may have wanted to play fast and loose anyway
 
There has been so much shit going on regarding sanctions and Greer's incompetence/IFP status and stalling that I genuinely forgot there's a copyright case still going on after the sanctions got cleared up. I think Russ has forgotten too, and just vaguely marks whenever the next court date/statement/whatever is supposed to be done by on a calendar and then just types "I'M BEING HARRASSED YOUR HONOR" into an email to relevant parties (making sure to CC Hardin so Hardin knows he's part of muh harrassment) and then goes on hooker sidequests until he realizes he has to sperg out again.
 
There has been so much shit going on regarding sanctions and Greer's incompetence/IFP status and stalling that I genuinely forgot there's a copyright case still going on after the sanctions got cleared up. I think Russ has forgotten too,
If only. I don't know how many times he's plight posted in his filings about The Hardship looking into and exposing his many lies that, according to Greee, don't matter because it's a copyright case.
 
There's a TON of shit still to be ruled on. Time for my monthly recap:

ECF 234, Hardin's motion for sanctions from FEBRUARY on Greer's lies about witnesses (and about Hardin) which was taken under advisement at the hearing IN MAY.

ECF 299, Greer's idiotic motion for show cause which was filed IN MAY, timely opposed by Hardin.

ECF 313, Hardin's motion to unseal Document 1 for private viewing with a mind to prove IFP fraud when the case was originally filed almost five years ago. Greer opposed.

ECF 314, Greer's idiotic motion for a protective order against Hardin, filed IN MAY, timely opposed by Hardin.

ECF 243, "taken under advisement" at the hearing IN MAY, pending Greer's production of the Utah 2018 docs. Greer never produced them. Case-ending sanctions were explicitly threatened in the hearing if Greer refused to produce them, but the Magistrate's language was more "We might have to look at that" than "DO IT OR ELSE" which would've maybe been more effective.

No motion was ever filed by Hardin on the "attorney's eyes only" bullshit but it was entered into the docket at ECF 321. The court won't do anything about it absent a motion, but it's out there.

ECF 330, Hardin's motion for sanctions on Greer re: the subpoena Greer fraudulently obtained from the clerk while discovery remains stayed. Filed IN JUNE, Greer has opposed.

ECF 331, Greer's motion for "clarification" AND for modification of the discovery stay, filed IN JUNE, timely opposed by Hardin.

ECF 337, Hardin's motion for sanctions re: Greer's fuckery in trying to get an "emergency" reschedule of the May 6 hearing and his lies to the court about that. Greer opposed.

ECF 346, last month's motion for sanctions from Greer on Hardin, filed improperly without the 21-day service as per usual. Hardin took his time but eventually responded.

ECF 350, Hardin's motion a few weeks ago to revoke Greer's access to electronic filing via emailing docs to the clerk. Greer has opposed.

And, of course, the motion to dismiss, originally filed IN APRIL at ECF 274. Response and reply have been made, nothing left to do but for a judge to rule on it.

I think those are all the action items that remain open. A metric buttload of shit sitting around for months with zero action from the judges.
That looks like a lot of work. I'd hate to be the guy who has to deal with that. I am 100% not the secret account of Judge David Barlow, but my view 100% represent his.
 
And, of course, the motion to dismiss, originally filed IN APRIL at ECF 274. Response and reply have been made, nothing left to do but for a judge to rule on it.
Is there any reason why this would not be the first thing ruled on now that the sanction has been resolved? Everything else might as well get wrapped up into another omnibus.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole