US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Yeah, all of these point to the same thing which is the future will not be a liberal societies of the past post WW2. Its going to be a much more authoritative state and ruled by overt force rather than implicit social contracts. I remeber two years ago republicans and the farms were scared AF about the idea of Biden or Kamala federalizing the local police forces. Republicans cheering for a federalized police force that is openly advertised as just an example to do this in other cities and extended past the time period it was designed to last is another break away from the cultural norms we've been living under. An observation, no judgements.
You're right. It's not the first time in history that has happened.
Things have changed heavily since pre-WW2. Attitudes, expectations, demographics. It literally cannot go back to whatever idealized liberal society you have in mind, at least not until a few hundred years post-Whites becoming the majority in population and influence again. All of those values could only be expressed due to the fact that we lived in a high trust white run society.
Besides, that liberal society pre-WW2 directly led to Somali migrants raping your daughter and then getting 1 million dollars raised on their GoFundMe by the same old people who lived and benefitted from those pre-WW2 values and societies. So fuck those liberal societies.
They keep the smart, driven people at the beck and call of the weak and stupid because "Fair's fair, and we all want to play nice, right?"
 
Did school/mass shootings just basically stop in the last few years? It seemed like during the 2000s/2010s there was a new massive school shooting or something every few years but the last one I can remember is either Parkland or Sandy Hook, whichever came last.
There was that pooner one, but mass/school shootings to tend some in waves. Every 4-5 years there seems to be a sudden outburst and a bunch of copycats. The media needs to not give them the insane amount of attention because it really sets off fame seeking copycats.
 
That is a very vague statement:
Example of how to deal with the problem?
Example of incompetent leadership being the problem?

Trump legally cannot take the actions he has taken in DC anywhere else. DC's method of operation is not a cultural norm anyway. It was only in '73 when DC stopped being run by Federal appointees and oh boy how well that has gone.
Ok, bookmark this because I guarantee Trump will do the same exact thing he is doing in DC to LA in the run up to the Olympics. He already has laid the groundwork for it. I dont think it stops in LA for the Olympics.

As people have pointed out, it may not be a bad thing but its definitely a thing that is happening.
 
Batshittery, but I wonder if Gavin Newsom will be standing around grinning like he was during the Pacific Palisades fires, when his state gets a big ol' earthquake?
I mean yeah, he probably will when he starts thinking of all the federal disaster money he can pocket and all the cheap ruined real estate he can sell off to developers.
If Mother Earth opens up and swallows him whole, I'll abide by her judgement.
🌎
 
Did school/mass shootings just basically stop in the last few years? It seemed like during the 2000s/2010s there was a new massive school shooting or something every few years but the last one I can remember is either Parkland or Sandy Hook, whichever came last.
It's all been Trannies lately so the media hasn't had the ability to push the gun control narrative.
 
It's all been Trannies lately so the media hasn't had the ability to push the gun control narrative.
You also have to remember that stats were being cooked when a black 19 year old was dealing in the school parking lot and got shot up it was considered a "school shooting".
 
Trump shit on him for refusing to let the fire victims rebuild again.
This is the thing that kills me about establishment politicians. All this stuff is just so easy. Like how hard would it be for him to let fire victims rebuild and not get shit on? Apparently, it's pretty hard. These people are so used to being handed political victory that they think they can govern completely incompetently and not experience consequences.
 
You also have to remember that stats were being cooked when a black 19 year old was dealing in the school parking lot and got shot up it was considered a "school shooting".
That correct, but that's not the kind of story that would make astroturfed headline news. I assume stats are the same as they've always been re; school shootings.
 
>there is a future
>voting


No sense in voting when you don't like either option and get the same result either way. I doubt I'm going to vote ever again, no sense in voting for red tribe or blue tribe when you don't align with either or anything in American politics and just can't force yourself to care anymore.
If you don't care and have given up, please kindly do the needful and stop bothering everyone else about it.
 
Ok, bookmark this because I guarantee Trump will do the same exact thing he is doing in DC to LA in the run up to the Olympics. He already has laid the groundwork for it. I dont think it stops in LA for the Olympics.

As people have pointed out, it may not be a bad thing but its definitely a thing that is happening.
I will bite: What groundwork?
 
Republicans cheering for a federalized police force that is openly advertised as just an example to do this in other cities and extended past the time period it was designed to last is another break away from the cultural norms we've been living under.
In fairness, there is a tangible difference in "why" that both groups here would be pushing for. A Republican is looking at DC is absolutely seeing a mayor who isn't doing their job and won't be cowed into doing their job. Thanks to this being DC, the next person in chain of command would, quite frankly, be POTUS or POTUS adjacent just due to DC's state of legal existence as not-in-any-state. If Biden or Kamala does it, well this doesn't square with their policy positions, Democrats traditionally support soft on crime policing, so clearly the action wouldn't be done for its own sake, which makes their motives much more able to be scrutinized. This ain't Trump dick sucking either, Republicans in general have owned being hard on crime for a long time.
... what exactly do you think he is trying to make an example of and to who?
A Democrat mayor he has direct control over enacting soft on crime policing and the city they are ruining, and to the United States to prove soft-on-crime means criminal enabling in practice.
Every 4-5 years there seems to be a sudden outburst and a bunch of copycats.
TBH, I wonder if this is a case of media framing writ large. US is big, we have guns and terrible schools, any time the media wants a story, they can flip through the files and find an attempted on whenever they want.
All this stuff is just so easy. Like how hard would it be for him to let fire victims rebuild and not get shit on?
With California, you have a citadel of red tape, so it may very well be that it is not in fact easy.

Of course, Newsom is also the one responsible/in control of most of that red tape too. So I'm not defending him per se, but more questioning to what degree Newsom is acting vs. Newsom is part of the swamp in California and exists in a state of tied-hands.
I will bite: What groundwork?
My wild guess... Trump trying to force-manage cities as a reaction to the litany of shitty mayors who quite frankly aren't doing their damn jobs and letting cities go to shit. The path of frog-boiling would be to declare an emergency in L.A., then go after DC since he has nothing really stopping him, and then NYC (If I'm correct about the Olympics.) under the auspices of something diplomatic given the Olympics is an excuse for nations to engage in dick measuring and there's no reason not to show off Uncle Sam's.
 
Ive been informed by unreliable sources that all of this stuff is just an israel first agenda
Nick fans have been and always will be angry that Charlie is the successful version of Nick.

All their stated goals are essentially the same. But while Nick is still the gay kid in his basement with no real political or real-world power. Charlie has made inroads across Colleges, high schools, State and local elections, and has a direct phone line to the majority of sitting officials, all the way to the President.

For a more detailed description of their dichotomy. I wrote up a longer think piece here.

The biggest impact Nick ever did was his groyper's cringe attack on him over 5 years ago. And while Nick stagnated with his cult, Charlie shrugged it off and went on to win BIGLY!
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole