💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Exactly - but then how does the court disentangle any negative effects from this, from her kids being removed, her husband posting about loving and fucking another one, court cases, financial difficulties...

If she was seeing a therapist, are they going to provide notes of their sessions?
Maybe Kayla should try to sue Nick for emotional damages... That would look much better case... Though I doubt there is any law for that...
 
Exactly - but then how does the court disentangle any negative effects from this, from her kids being removed, her husband posting about loving and fucking another one, court cases, financial difficulties...

If she was seeing a therapist, are they going to provide notes of their sessions?
She would need her therapist to testify, but she most likely doesn't even have one.
 
What was that weird shit that happened when a superchat came in and was immediately taken down that said something to the effect of "Does Gabe know about Ralph raping and murdering a woman in 1998"?
It’s a meme. Neither of them got the joke.
I didn’t watch much beyond that, but seems like it was a complete gong show. There was no revelation at all?
Oh well!
 
>Gabe right at the start of the stream last night
"we're no tardski"
>Gabe midway then after the stream
"holy shit she's six million tardski's"

one thing for sure, this probably killed keanu's streaming "career", i can't imagine anyone would want to be hosted by her for any reason after this. which is pretty funny.
 
Is this the 1 in 5 research NIck is referring to? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3945599/
Who knows?
Hair testing was used to investigate the prevalence of unsuspected exposure to drugs of abuse in a group of children presenting to an urban paediatric emergency department without suggestive signs or symptoms. Hair samples were obtained from 114 children between 24 months and 10 years of age attending the emergency room of Hospital del Mar in Barcelona, Spain.
The subjects were children admitted to the paediatric department, already it'll be disingenuous to extrapolate this onto the entire population, most of which don't do drugs nor do they abuse their children.
The samples were analyzed for the presence of opiates, cocaine, amphetamines, and cannabinoids by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
They're looking at more than just cocaine though, so skelly already lied if this were the "study" he's trying to cite. He said cocaine only. Also, they're using UPLC-MS/MS, not GC-MS.
Were they using a cut-off? Nope.
Hair samples from twenty-three children (20.1%) were positive for cocaine (concentration range 0.15–3.81 ng/mg hair), those of thirteen children (11.4%) to cannabinoids (Δ9-THC concentration range 0.05–0.54 ng/mg hair), with four samples positive to codeine (0.1–0.25 ng/mg hair), one positive for 2.09 ng methadone per mg hair and one to 6-MAM (0.42 ng/mg hair) and morphine (0. 15 ng/mg hair) .
Narcotic or metaboliteCount | percentConcentration
Cocaine23 | 20.1%150-3810pg/mg
Δ9-THC13 | 11.4%50-540pg/mg
codeine4100-250pg/mg
methadone12090pg/mg
6-MAM1420pg/mg
Morphine1150pg/mg
Here's the cut-off commonly used:
1749808674455.webp
See the numbers? A lot of them falls under the cut-off or tested positive borderline.
That's what I've been saying. Only one kid tested positive with cut-off referenced. The other 4 could have tested positive too, but the results were below cut-off.
This isn't really the own he thinks it is and he shouldn't be citing this study.
In 69.5 and 69.2% of the positive cocaine and cannabinoids cases respectively, drugs was also found in the hair of accompanying parent.
70% of those tested positive for cocaine and cannabinoids had likely user parents.

This study was conducted in the Paediatric Emergency Department of the Hospital del Mar of Barcelona, Spain, between March and April 2013. The hospital is located in an urban area with low socioeconomic status and a high percentage (more than 40%) of immigrants.
This hospital is located in an area of lower socioeconomic status, not some rich urban neighbourhood which would have been more applicable to this skeleton.

Why don't we look at cocaine?
1749809180472.webp
The highest recoded for cocaine was 4.73ng/mg which is 4730pg/mg.
The highest recoded for benzoylecgonine was M27 at 4670pg/mg. This result is weird as the kid only tested positive for cocaine at 710pg/mg, that is barely above cut-off. It could be contamination. However, we know skelly's daughter A.R.R. tested positive for COCAINE at 5000pg/mg, as the reports references a cut-off value of 500, used for cocaine, not benzoylecgonine. We know by his own admission that she tested positive for benzoylecgonine as well.
That's right, none of them tested positive for cocaine at >5000pg/mg.
A.R.R. has a grim future. :(
While it has been proved that acute exposure to cocaine during childhood is associated with neurologic manifestations such as focal and generalized seizures in children eight years of age and younger and alterations in mental status, including delirium stupor and coma in older children, and even death in cases of oral or inhaled routes of intoxication, the long term effects of a repeated postnatal exposure to cocaine have not been clarified yet.
I'm still waiting for your 40 abstracts cope stream sponsored by Quora.
Since hair testing for drugs of abuse is still an expensive test due to the required specific skills and instrumentation, unfortunately it cannot be proposed as a general screening for the paediatric population. As maximum cost benefit ratio, we advocate performing this test in the paediatric population attending emergency wards or general hospital for any complaint when:

-
the hospital is located in a area of very high percentage of drug consumption and socioeconomic difficulties;
-
there is clinical suspicion of acute intoxication from any possible drug in the child;
-
there is a clinical suspicion of chronic intoxication from any possible drug in the child;
-
there is a suspicion or evidence or declaration of drug addiction in the accompanying parent;
-
there is evidence of a risky environment around the child.
Specific social and health interventions towards exposed children and their families may help in preventing and treating possible intellectual, emotional-behavioural and neurologic disorders in the exposed children. This strategy can also lead to educating and counselling parents on potentially deleterious effects of drugs of abuse available and consumed at home even if it is done not in the presence of the children.

I'll laugh my fucking arse off if he used this "study" to show 20% of children are exposed to narcotics at a level that can be picked up by mass spectroscopy.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Hate to say it but Rekieta needed a small W do push the doomsday-Benoit clock back a bit.

At least we got to hear at least some of what those people who have been teasing new info claim?

I know this is cope
I agree with this concept. Chris Chan got boring when too many weens were circling him, he (after a very long time) got wise.
Lolcows need green pastures to produce sweet milk. Let them have their deluded successes. The pride before the fall, etc.

I hope he doesn't win anything on Montegraph though. He legitimately called him a "boy cock sucking pedophile" for no reason.
He's arguing in his Anti-SLAPP dismissal that because Monty played the role of a rapist as an actor, that somehow translates into the actor himself, in reality, being reasonably called a pedophile, which is absurd
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Doomers stop overlooking the real W here
Many of you need to remember Gabe's nothing burger caused Nick to reveal child abuse allegations to try and get ahead of something.

I need the strongest kiwi video geniuses to splice 3 videos.

1) The video where Nick is raging at Sean about the farms & people saying he beats his kids.

2) The video where Nick claims the allegations are about choke slamming his kid

3) anything worth salvaging from the Gabe steam.

I'm not doing it I'm lazy but adding dates for each clip would make it kino.
 
I agree with this concept. Chris Chan got boring when too many weens were circling him, he (after a very long time) got wise.
Lolcows need green pastures to produce sweet milk. Let them have their deluded successes. The pride before the fall, etc.

I hope he doesn't win anything on Montegraph though. He legitimately called him a boy cock sucking pedophile for no reason.
He's arguing in his Anti-SLAPP dismissal that because Monty played the role of a rapist as an actor, that somehow translates into the actor himself, in reality, being reasonably called a pedophile, which is absurd
There's no way in hell that holds up in the court against monty in favor of Rekieta. I would like to think it wouldn't, even from a pragmatic standpoint, but given the way things have gone in this country for many such cases that are criminal versus his civil case against him, I guess anything can happen.
 
-Nick trapped Kayla in a corner and yelled "HIT ME!" over and over again at her to try and bait her into hitting him so Nick could get her in trouble

-Nick cornered Kayla in the shower and screamed at her. Kayla panicked and bashed her head against the shower window, giving her a gash in her head and concussive symptoms

-Nick's former close friend claims Nick "is physical" with his kids in an "impulsive and disciplinary way" (not punching them) and is comfortable with doing this in front of others, something verified by multiple people

This info wasn't worth 4 fucking hours of recapping Nick's entire history with retard whore Keanu

Thanks for the summary.
Yeah, this could have been a tweet.
 
>Gabe right at the start of the stream last night
"we're no tardski"
>Gabe midway then after the stream
"holy shit she's six million tardski's"

one thing for sure, this probably killed keanu's streaming "career", i can't imagine anyone would want to be hosted by her for any reason after this. which is pretty funny.
It was really a make it or break it moment for Keanu Thompson and I found her way, way more annoying than Gabe Hoffman just recapping everything and dangling the allegations for 4 hours. Indeed, I felt the urge to chokeslam and drive something through glass walls.

At least Gabe gave me a recap. Keanu interrupted constantly with things I don't care like her opinions, treating it like a conversation instead of an interview.

She has no idea how to read out superchats and the dead air where she hums like a bimbo while skimming through the superchats and deciding what to read and not shouting out the person sending the money is infuriating and surprising considering that she supposedly had years of experience doing this.

There was one part where she just displays screenshots describing a torture rape cartoon featuring teenagers and saying nothing expecting the audience to silent read the screenshot and not considering that some are listening, not watching the interview.

She blew this opportunity for clout hard just like how she blew figuratively and literally in her Onlyfans stint. It was such a waste.
 
>go to bed because I'm eurofag and enjoy good sleepy time
>Wake up to read 60pages
>99% farmers complaining
>1% still being "not my story to tell/not on kiki"

I know it looks bad, but how retarded are people calling it unironic nick W? He told on himself with "chokeslam", he seethed in the chat, probably got out wife to greenlight more humiliation suing with Aaron. What would satisfy you guy? Yea, Gabe have lost goodwill that rakietalogs gave him, and whatever else he could have noone will believe he have something big if he failed to show it first time. He's gay and Jewish.
The only thing we should take form it is to tell to every faggot like Gabe, Meme, etc, who keeps saying "there's a story but it's not mine to tell" to kill themselves before trying to insert themselves as someone "in the known", drip drip drip from fucking rafters.
 
Exactly - but then how does the court disentangle any negative effects from this, from her kids being removed, her husband posting about loving and fucking another one, court cases, financial difficulties...

If she was seeing a therapist, are they going to provide notes of their sessions?
I mean… Kayla already posted nudes of herself. And publicly. Not just to one person.

Good luck to Nick showing any damages, though the seethe we will see when he gets a verdict of $50 worth of damages and 50.000$ worth of lawyers costs will be absolutely delightful.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole