Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
The worst part is, you know Russell's googling right now "How to overturn a judge's order for sanctions when your requests to stay or reconsider, or appeal, have been rejected three times and the judge says any further protests won't result in any more delays and if you fail to pay for the fourth time there WILL be an additional sanction of $500?"
Granted, but that was a payment to the court. The day he submits and pays actual dollars to Hardin/Null, I'll eat a bug
When Russ first asked for the 10% bonded stay pending appeal, Hardin said he should have to pay bond for the full $5,500 it should've been and could still be on appeal, and I think Russ might've actually taken that deal if he could.

Russ is so spiteful and confident he'll win, I really do believe he'd post a $5,500 bond to put off paying $1000 because at least for the time being, Null hasn't gotten a red cent out of him!
"If you do not bring these documnts until 24.6.25 you will be sanctioned by X"
An additional $500 sanction is half of the existing $1000 one, so I hope the further penalties continue to be half of the existing sanctions as the amount multiplies.

Like, if he fails to pay the $1000 and it turns into $1500, he should have to pay that or suffer an additional sanction of $750, and if he fails to pay the resulting $2,250, suffer a sanction of $1,125, and when he fails to pay $3,375 be sanctioned another $1,687.50
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I'm looking forward to it going to the 10th again and Null not having to lift a finger before it gets thrown out.
When this happens, it'll be incredible. Last time, he was backed by somewhat competent lawyers who managed to finagle a time-travel appeal. Russ will file a million motions over how the 10th circuit already basically said he won, that they should rule in his favor, but can't even be accepted due to technical reasons. I'm sure Russ will frantically email those lawyers again and I hope the non-replies somehow become exhibits. On top of 15 random whore screenshots ofc.
I’m surprised Russ hasn’t filed anything today, objecting to the ruling. When I saw the judge cite $1000 I had a feeling Russ would immediately file something to clarify that he and Hardin agreed to the deduction.
I'm not sure who's gonna make the first move after the rulings. Who knows if Russ is gonna continue plightsperging over recent motions or find something new.
At worst he will cry to daddy and his father will bail him out.
I'm very curious about that dynamic. I've got no doubt Russ doesn't have any issues groveling to his parents in a dire situation, but he's also terrified about people discovering his antics. Russ surely doesn't truthfully explain what he needs the money for so I wonder how he goes about it
 
I'm not sure who's gonna make the first move after the rulings. Who knows if Russ is gonna continue plightsperging over recent motions or find something new.
At this point Hardin will likely simply file what the court asked on the schedule they requested. And probably his 2 still outstanding sanctions requests. The only other thing I could see him asking is politely for the Court to Strike Greee's porn stash from the record. Although he may pass on that one as the Judge seems wound up.

Shitlips is completely unpredictable. It's possible that Barlow's smackdown scares him for a few days.
 
At this point Hardin will likely simply file what the court asked on the schedule they requested. And probably his 2 still outstanding sanctions requests.

That seems most likely. I'm fine with the magistrate denying his request for additional time. Even though there are some matters that Hardin would like the court to rule on before submitting his reply at the end of the month, it should be quite obvious from past history that even with a time extension the court would be unlikely to rule on anything that Hardin is waiting on them for, making the extension for time pointless.

I also take this as a good sign that the magistrate judge is going to dismiss the case. On top of all of the other shenanigans, Greer failing for all of these months to do even the most simple thing and produce a document has broken the judge. He just wants to get it over with and knows that the district judge will sign off on that decision. I also think that the district judge won't be reducing any sanctions this next time either. I'm excited to see how much more expensive that $67 restraining order becomes.

The only downside is that unless Greer does something new and unhinged, I can't imagine much happening for the next three weeks. Of course every other time I've thought that recently, Greer has done something so spectacularly stupid that I'm left completely gobsmacked.
 
i could've sworn it was something handed down by the 10th circuit. is this a mandela effect or am i just retarded? (i'm just retarded, most likely)
It's not illegal to post DMCA, but the 10th says that if you do it, it could encourage copyright infringement in the past.
 
i could've sworn it was something handed down by the 10th circuit. is this a mandela effect or am i just retarded? (i'm just retarded, most likely)
Here's what the 10th said.
2025-06-11_19-35.webp
2025-06-11_19-36.webp
2025-06-11_19-36_1.webp
Document here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66664788/010010936535/1/greer-v-moon/
 
It's not illegal to post DMCA, but the 10th says that if you do it, it could encourage copyright infringement in the past.
Maybe the 10th circuit did it because they thought it'd be funny to watch Russ's attempt to argue time travel copyright infringement or something? Jokes on them though, Russ didn't take the bait. Instead, he filed pictures of Hitler and hookers. Some would say he just "pops off at the mouth".
 
I also take this as a good sign that the magistrate judge is going to dismiss the case. On top of all of the other shenanigans, Greer failing for all of these months to do even the most simple thing and produce a document has broken the judge.

He basically has to (recommend Barlow dismisses it). At the 5/6 hearing he basically said "I'm giving 14 more days to produce the document, and then we're looking at 37(b) case ending sanctions if he doesn't get around to it". He didn't get around to it even with another extension. Not dismissing it after such a clear warning severely undermines the court's authority.

I'm calling 90+% chance the case is terminated shortly after the reply to the response to the MTD is in, and 50-60% that Josh gets full costs & fees due to all of the fuckery. If the motion to unseal ECF no. 1 is granted and fraud to obtain IFP is proven, I think that also jumps to 90+% as it taints the entire legislation from the get-go and is an enormous abuse of the judicial process.

Screenshot 2025-06-11 at 10.32.58 PM.webp

Imagine greeeee on the hook for like 100k. lol.
 
I'm calling 90+% chance the case is terminated shortly after the reply to the response to the MTD is in, and 50-60% that Josh gets full costs & fees due to all of the fuckery. If the motion to unseal ECF no. 1 is granted and fraud to obtain IFP is proven, I think that also jumps to 90+% as it taints the entire legislation from the get-go and is an enormous abuse of the judicial process.
I'm thinking when they finally get around to dismissing it, it will be based on as many discretionary grounds as possible to invoke abuse of discretion review and basically put a stake through its heart and bury it at a crossroads at dawn with garlic sewn in its mouth.

I am hoping that's specifically why they're demanding that response Hardin filed a motion for an extension on (and I do not believe Hardin actually even wanted that granted).
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole