This was one of the most insufferable parts of his Rittenhouse trial coverage and why I eventually switched to Law & Crime’s commentary-free coverage. He (and others) wanted Richards to object to every other word out of Binger’s mouth.
Nick Rekieta, who as far as I know has never litigated a case that has gone to a jury trial, did not understand that it is not a good idea to piss off the judge with incessant objections. Also, if the prosecution is making a retarded and far-fetched comparison, why the hell would you interrupt? Let the jury see how nonsensical the argument is.
Overall really obnoxious to hear Nick say “I could do soooo much better than this veteran criminal defense attorney who is also a former prosecutor with 35 years of intense legal experience!”