- Dołączono
- 6 Lut 2021
For the sake of innocent skunks and raccoons, I hope the answer is no.
Ostatnio edytowane:
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
For the sake of innocent skunks and raccoons, I hope the answer is no.
David Foster Wallace was the master of the run-on sentence - some of his in Infinite Jest go on for 3 pages.Doesn't it depend on the formality of the writing? Comma splices in formal writing to the point it makes it unclear sucks, but I like deliberately making it unclear with them if I don't care what people think about it.
I always liked Joyce's deliberately annoying refusals to punctuate to make things even more ambiguous than they already were.
I dunno man I’m struggling with this one. I can fully believe Nick would do something like this, and the surface level evidence seems to support that he did.Nick did his gay implication thing to imply Aaron dosed her with cocaine in her food. That sounds like a Freudian slip to me. Daughter can't snitch because she didn't know she was getting dosed. CPS is notoriously incompetent. Nick probably just said he didn't know how she got the positive test and they just believed him.
49:53-50:45
Robert Barnes on the 28th of May 2024: "The warrant basically violates all the war rules of warrants"
You attached the same clip for both of them1:01:38-1:03:42
Robert Barnes on the 28th of May 2024: "A corrupt cop wrote a fake warrant"
They likely asked her if she had been taking a white powdery substance up her nose. If she says no, what can they do? At that point you are at accidental environmental ingestion as a likely explanation and no obvious reason why someome would literally feed their child cocaine.I dunno man I’m struggling with this one. I can fully believe Nick would do something like this, and the surface level evidence seems to support that he did.
But how the fuck did he get away with it then? There were child abuse charges at first - that was about the positive test, wasn’t it? So how did they get dropped?
This seems too serious to just sweep under the rug, more serious than the possession itself.
Did the cops actually fuck something up and that’s why such a lenient deal was offered, to avoid going to trial and having to admit that?
First, the guys an addict and that's a waste of good blow.
Second, as much you could conceive that maybe he would come up with such a harebrained scheme, do you really think everyone else would go along with it?
I don't care what any DNA test may say, Nick has earned himself a Star of David for such unabashed kikery.Wyświetl załącznik 6915588
- Nick Rekieta, Xitter 1/26/2025 (after pleading guilty).
Full Xeet.
Wyświetl załącznik 6915601
I'll leave it there. This seems obvious to me.
You are forgetting that all cut-off and test values are for use by adults, there are no values for children. Or at least that is what I remember on the topic from the aggregated information posted on KF when the info first came out.Bullshit. The amount was consistent with daily use. That doesn't mean it PROVES daily use. It is also consistent with a single particularly large dose, perhaps from negligent exposure. It is not consistent with incidental exposure.
"Is this an agenda against Chad"Sorry, but are you ACTUALLY kidding?
If I was an innocent parent, particularly a parent in the public eye, in which the law and approximately +/- 100K people are paying attention...
...I would:
1) Retest my kid on my own dime. Her hair is long. This is not hard. (It's still long, btw. Pics are out there.)
2) Publicize the negative tests ON BLAST.
3) Scream to the HIGH HEAVENS that I have EVIDENCE that her hair does not show cocaine dosing.
Nick cannot do ANY of that. I wonder why.
Also, do you really think the State wouldn't have followed up on the positive test? Of course they did.
Is this an agenda against Chad? I don't even know what we're discussing.
It's obvious (to me) Nick was dosing his kid. He'd have proven otherwise by now if it was not true.
You attached the same clip for both of them
You would do nothing because you had the case sealed. Any court records, including tests and their results, are under seal.Sorry, but are you ACTUALLY kidding?
If I was an innocent parent, particularly a parent in the public eye, in which the law and approximately +/- 100K people are paying attention...
...I would:
True, but this is Nick.I do not think that Nick can just go around publishing things because he needs to argue with people online.
Thank you!barnesclip.mp4
Apologies, this is the "This warrant violates all the rules of warrants" clip.
I still think the idea that Rekieta intentionally dosed his kid is insane and I don't believe it.
First, the guys an addict and that's a waste of good blow. Second, as much you could conceive that maybe he would come up with such a harebrained scheme, do you really think everyone else would go along with it? Did he hide it? How did he do that? How did he justify it then after the test results?
After she tested positive, do you not think CPS wouldn't have gone through some questions with the kid and Rekieta? Do you honestly think the guy would walk with some probation and a promise to be a good boy if they caught wind of him dosing his nine-year-old?
I think it is far, far more likely that this wetbrained retard who had spent shells all over his floor just wasn't careful locking up his stash and his kid got into it without him realising. Because he is a narc, he can't ever concede that his horrible parenting abilities and poor life decisions that are so FUN and WEIRD had an adverse effect on those he is supposed to protect and so he just denied it ever happened.
He never saw his kid high (because he never watches them), so therefore it didn't happen, therefore the state made it up. That's the way I see it.
On a day when there’s been so much to clear up, Nick has been unusually quiet.![]()
![]()
![]()
Totally what a CHIPS case is for. Thank you Nick!Don't you know he has a an ongoing legal case where the government is trying to RIP HIS FAMILY APART???? You don't understand how it works in MN!
He cant stop talking about his Chippendales case thoTotally what a CHIPS case is for. Thank you Nick!
Wyświetl załącznik 6917580
Wait, is Nick lying??? Who would have thought. (Source)
I am not be surprised to learn that he tried to recruit other streamer for his degenerate lifestyle and swinging.Unsurprising but mildly amusing: Aaron mentioned yesterday that Chrissy Mayr told him how Nick offered her cocaine at Anime Matsuri (August 2023). Eleven months later he went on her show, claimed he dindu nuffin, and insinuated that the cops planted drugs in his house. He must have been pretty confident that she would play along.
This also suggests that many of the streamer types Nick had meetups with knew about his little habit.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WJ5LRcqWfrg:293
Sorry to tell you- they're still going through it now. It's not like mom is off the THC gummies or dad off the Galaxy Gas.the kids had to endure the total chaos at home and how many other "partner" they met over the years.