💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Without the tests or the write up of the report containing the results of the test, it is a massive "I want to believe" stance to believe someone that got to know about Niggieta yesterday has some inside scoop about a confidential CPS report; I´m sorry for anyone giddy about it, but there is no way to believe it, specially mentioning a blood test that has a pretty short window to attest use and wasn´t made at the time of the report we got via @MNPublicRecords already verified.
 
* Nick's kid tested positive at a level consistent with daily use.
That statement is not supported by the information available to us.
All we know is that one test exceeded the range of the calibration.

This could have been an entire hair or a section for a specific period from which you could extrapolate at what time the cocaine was consumed.
I assume that the more detailed test was done, but results are sealed, and all court documents it would be discussed in are sealed as well.

The ONLY thing we know for a fact is that there was a test that showed a positive test result, no info about the time frame or frequency of use.
Anyone claiming differently is as retarded as Nick and making shit up.
 
Without the tests or the write up of the report containing the results of the test, it is a massive "I want to believe" stance to believe someone that got to know about Niggieta yesterday has some inside scoop about a confidential CPS report; I´m sorry for anyone giddy about it, but there is no way to believe it, specially mentioning a blood test that has a pretty short window to attest use and wasn´t made at the time of the report we got via @MNPublicRecords already verified.

Sorry, but are you ACTUALLY kidding?

If I was an innocent parent, particularly a parent in the public eye, in which the law and approximately +/- 100K people are paying attention...

...I would:
1) Retest my kid on my own dime. Her hair is long. This is not hard. (It's still long, btw. Pics are out there.)
2) Publicize the negative tests ON BLAST.
3) Scream to the HIGH HEAVENS that I have EVIDENCE that her hair does not show cocaine dosing.

Nick cannot do ANY of that. I wonder why.

Also, do you really think the State wouldn't have followed up on the positive test? Of course they did.

Is this an agenda against Chad? I don't even know what we're discussing.

It's obvious (to me) Nick was dosing his kid. He'd have proven otherwise by now if it was not true.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
If I was an innocent parent, particularly a parent in the public eye, in which the law and approximately +/- 100K people are paying attention...

...I would:
1) Retest my kid on my own dime. Her hair is long. This is not hard. (It's still long, btw. Pics are out there.)
2) Publicize the negative tests ON BLAST.
3) Scream to the HIGH HEAVENS that I have EVIDENCE that her hair does not show cocaine dosing.

Nick cannot do ANY of that. I wonder why.

Also, do you really think the State wouldn't have followed up on the positive test? Of course they did.
Such a shame that information isn't public. I agree with you but I think we could go on for weeks and weeks speculating without ever getting real answers unfortunately.
 
That statement is not supported by the information available to us.
Bullshit. The amount was consistent with daily use. That doesn't mean it PROVES daily use. It is also consistent with a single particularly large dose, perhaps from negligent exposure. It is not consistent with incidental exposure.
 
Such a shame that information isn't public. I agree with you but I think we could go on for weeks and weeks speculating without ever getting real answers unfortunately.
Bullshit. The amount was consistent with daily use. That doesn't mean it PROVES daily use. It is also consistent with a single particularly large dose, perhaps from negligent exposure. It is not consistent with incidental exposure.
It's entirely possible we may never know with 100% certainty exactly what happened in that house, but we should all be able to agree on this:

There is zero legitimate reason his daughter should have tested positive for coke. And certainly not in the levels she did.

And no, it didn't happen because a cop patted her head
 
Keep in mind the daughter knows the truth and so do the rest of his kids. Nick may have got his kids back, but did he actually? Remember the horrific shit he's said about his wife and kids in public, and that's even before he eventually ends alone, living the Ralphamale lifestyle. He's also not going to stop and it's a matter of when he breaks his probation, not if. I give it less then a month, especially if he starts doing streams again. He'll just get so fucked up, and basically do a repeat of the Cokestream, but with whippets this time.
 
We're discussing Aaron.

If you don't think he wouldn't be "leaking information" then "use your head for a second Jesus Christ."

Also, I happen to think Aaron is a bit lovable but he IS "absolute pants shitting retarded", as is the entire Dabbleverse.

Thanks for making this post so easy by quoting you.
I think Aaron would be leaking info like a sieve. I just don't think Aaron has any credible paths to actual or truthful information about the kids. Aaron is a degenerate idiot. He is a true cow, just like all the rest. None of these people would have access to any of the child related info. EVER. It's a sealed child related court proceedings that also involves the personal medical records of minors.

Two things can be true here.
A. Nick's 8-9 yo daughter tested positive for obscene levels of cocaine metabolization. We have seen documents confirming this.

B. This new "Shocking Insider Leak" is almost certainly Ralph style made up bullshit to drive traffic to one of these retards streams. Could it be true? It's within the range of possibilities based on the test we do know about. Is it likely true? Not based on the sketchy sources.

Law Enforcement or the DA can and do leak. But not about something like this. You don't touch the kid stuff.

If the tests had come back the way this Zummock cow is claiming Nick would be facing felony child abuse charges. Any plea would have been shredded and he would be going to jail. They don't generally hand wave this sort of thing away. They don't waffle over whether they Lawtube Cocaine King shared his mountains of cocaine with his kid, if they find it in the bloodworm or urine. The Prosecutor will roll the dice on that.
 
He is a giver, He is a giver.
He fed his kids bowls of jism.
cuckieta-cooking.png
He has his kids thoroughly blackmailed. If they do not go along with his story, he will force them to eat whatever vile slop this is. Fuck, look at his threatening eyes in the third panel. Du VILL eat de JIZZUM!
 
I'll leave it there. This seems obvious to me.
Although I appreciate your contribution to the thread, @Melty Butter, one must always be responsible to keep their own confirmation bias in check.

While it may be compelling to believe in Zumock's story, the objective reality is that we have Zumock stating that someone said they know that someone else knows that Rekieta's children tested positive for cocaine in multiple tests. That is hardly credible information.

For such strong allegations, this is not enough for me to trust this information. It may be fun to speculate about this, for sure, but I wouldn't trust it per se. I don't think anyone in this thread is also saying that such a thing is impossible to have happened. People are just saying that Zumock's clips are hardly compelling evidence for this hypothesis.
 
I am not a lawyer or legal professional, but is it not an incredibly easy thing to look at Nick, who has admitted he wants to do more drugs, who (in the past) has gone to Vegas and presumably consumed alcohol and cocaine in Vegas, and say, "You are absolutely not going out of state to a place where you used the substances we're not going to allow you to use while you're on probation, you fucking retard"?

Because if I was a judge and I had a defendant plead to possession of cocaine, who has obviously abused multiple substances simultaneously, I wouldn't let him go back to a place where he has done it. It'd look like if they let him go, they were banking on his inability to control himself to fuck himself over.

Actually on second thought, I'm fully supportive of it. Let Nick felt himself again. He hasn't clinched LOTY2025 yet.

I will note he did not reveal the location. I think he is trying to get an approval before naming the location. If he is forced to do so, I wish I sould hear his spin of the trip as 'business'.

But fr, I wonder if the stupid one-space approach is partially why so many yoots can't seem to tell when to use a comma and when to use a period - they have lacked an additional visual association that would underscore the difference and reinforce when to use which. And they also don't read enough real books.

Pure speculation, but I'm equally dismayed by single-spacing and comma splices, so I've sewn them together with my theory.

I am not an enjoyer of the double-return after a full stop, but I link the decline in reading comprehension and writing skills to the removal of the Classics and Bard study in grammar classes and the discontinuation of sentence diagramming.

Robert Barnes's pet retard Viva Frei has broken out the big broom to sweep up for Barnes and Rekieta.

Wyświetl załącznik 6914066

Link | Archive
I legitimately want to know what Viva means by "Barnes was right"
Didn't Barnes say the warrant would be tossed out? Instead it got affirmed and Nick plead guilty

He was 'right' about the 'conspiracy' against Nick! The government HAD to convict him, and the fact they did is PROOF of the conspiracy!
 
...I would:
1) Retest my kid on my own dime. Her hair is long. This is not hard. (It's still long, btw. Pics are out there.)
2) Publicize the negative tests ON BLAST.
3) Scream to the HIGH HEAVENS that I have EVIDENCE that her hair does not show cocaine dosing.

Nick cannot do ANY of that. I wonder why.
Nick's cope for this is that the police weren't interested in doing a second test. Nick also claimed that he couldn't do a test himself because he no longer had access to his kids so he couldn't do a test, he claimed he asked the court and they refused (clips of this were posted a while ago). Of course no one believes him, just saying that is what he said.
 
First time poster here, I don't know if this if this true, and God I hope not, this was one of the worst things I've ever read from a cow ever. If this true then Nick should fucking kill himself, no fucking child ever should be given drugs and he actually cared about his family once to know this.
Welcome to the thread of twice loty WINNER and superior milk producer (also according to Aaron Imholte) compared to yawn-inducing gambling retard.

Anyways, top level rundown:
- it is true
- his daughter tested positive for a cocaine metabolite called benzoylecgonine, which is excreted via urine and metabolised in the liver
- the positive result here refers to the cutoff, which was 500 picograms/milligram
- this means his other kids might have all tested positive for trace amounts of said metabolite, but it was below the cutoff, so the state didn't care. Skelly can disprove my claim by showing me the test results.
- she tested at over 5000pg/mg, over ten times the cutoff
- they definitely retested the samples
- We don't know how the cocaine got into her.
- everything nitrous Nick said was a lie. The cop with gloves, test results being wrong, it's all lies and lies and lies. He claimed he read 40 free abstracts (he still cannot pronounce the metabolites) and thus is an expert. Turns out his lie was based solely on a quora post made by someone who was convicted for running a ecstasy lab.
- GC-MS will NOT get this wrong. All the studies I've read regarding intentional exposure mostly had test levels at well below the 500 cutoff, it was never above 1000. This means I did see a few results that were above the cutoff. I never saw anything close to 2000 let alone >5000.

And yeah. When this news was brought to us by @MNPublicRecords, the first few responses was "kys nick". He should take this advice.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I still think the idea that Rekieta intentionally dosed his kid is insane and I don't believe it.

First, the guys an addict and that's a waste of good blow. Second, as much you could conceive that maybe he would come up with such a harebrained scheme, do you really think everyone else would go along with it? Did he hide it? How did he do that? How did he justify it then after the test results?

After she tested positive, do you not think CPS wouldn't have gone through some questions with the kid and Rekieta? Do you honestly think the guy would walk with some probation and a promise to be a good boy if they caught wind of him dosing his nine-year-old?

I think it is far, far more likely that this wetbrained retard who had spent shells all over his floor just wasn't careful locking up his stash and his kid got into it without him realising. Because he is a narc, he can't ever concede that his horrible parenting abilities and poor life decisions that are so FUN and WEIRD had an adverse effect on those he is supposed to protect and so he just denied it ever happened.

He never saw his kid high (because he never watches them), so therefore it didn't happen, therefore the state made it up. That's the way I see it.
 
First, the guys an addict and that's a waste of good blow.
Nick shared it with Kayla, Aaron, and April, so I'm sure he's willing to share with his daughter if he considers it her "medicine"
Second, as much you could conceive that maybe he would come up with such a harebrained scheme, do you really think everyone else would go along with it? Did he hide it?
Probably hid it. Nick's a known liar and seems to manipulate Kayla regularly (I will be us tattoo). Wouldn't be surprised if he used the "metabolized glove" excuse on her and April too. If not, he probably justified it to Kayla by saying he knew what he was doing and it would treat her ADHD. She's a pushover retard and would just believe him. Once the shit hit the fan he probably told her that if she snitched about the cocaine it'd destroy the family and it'd be her fault
After she tested positive, do you not think CPS wouldn't have gone through some questions with the kid and Rekieta? Do you honestly think the guy would walk with some probation and a promise to be a good boy if they caught wind of him dosing his nine-year-old?
Nick did his gay implication thing to imply Aaron dosed her with cocaine in her food. That sounds like a Freudian slip to me. Daughter can't snitch because she didn't know she was getting dosed. CPS is notoriously incompetent. Nick probably just said he didn't know how she got the positive test and they just believed him.
I think it is far, far more likely that this wetbrained retard who had spent shells all over his floor just wasn't careful locking up his stash and his kid got into it without him realising. Because he is a narc, he can't ever concede that his horrible parenting abilities and poor life decisions that are so FUN and WEIRD had an adverse effect on those he is supposed to protect and so just denied it ever happened.
I think it's far less likely an 8 year old would be ingesting cocaine on her own.
He never saw his kid high (because he never watches them), so therefore it didn't happen, therefore the state made it up. That's the way I see it.
Nick falsely accused the state of lying throughout the entire trial. He said the cops planted the cocaine, he accused the judge of lying under oath, he claimed the whole thing was a conspiracy to frame him, he said they lied about the warrant.

Whenever Nick accuses someone else of lying, he's lying.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole