💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
The wildest thing is Nick cooked up colourless slop with his shaking hands, but then is a food critic.
Nick's entire life now revolves around Aaron and it's pathetic.

Aaron cooks something? Nick has to prove he's a better chef. Aaron loves boxing? All of a sudden Nick's even more of an expert despite showing no prior interest. A pedophile Nick's never heard of hates Aaron? Nick's now paying to talk to him, treats him like his best friend, and is begging the court to let him fly out to his event in Vegas.

He's put more effort into obsessing over Aaron than he has fixing his own life and his relationships with his friends and family.

I guarantee if Aaron posted a picture of his shit, Nick would say how weak and unhealthy it is and instantly post a picture of his own "superior" turd.

Does Nick have daddy issues? This is a very unhealthy attachment.
 
I haven't found much to laugh at since Friday but delving into the forms required by MN for the Presentence Report (PSR) gave me a snort. Nick must fill this out.

Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 9.38.07 AM.png Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 9.38.28 AM.png Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 9.38.48 AM.png

Here's my crosspost from the legal thread with more details on the information that the PSR will require. TL;DR, it will be a favorable PSR.
Color me curious. Here's what the PSI will cover in MN.
 
Also how the FUCK does anyone mistake a Minnesota accent for a North Dakota accent? I guess he's autistic as well as retarded.
Depending on the parts of Minnesota and North Dakota, they can be pretty damn similar. (ie the stereotypical Fargo accent- oh you betcha, uptown, dontcha know?...)

That said, how did this joker of a lawyer understand Nick's lispy, faggy, skelly speech? Did he need a translator for that classic Houston-Rural Minnesota accent? Or is he just fluent in faggot? (I'm joking- We know from his *discharge* he is fluent.)
 
It’s a holdover from typewriters (even electric typewriters and early word processors) which used monospace font. You were taught it in school if you’re gen x.

It is objectively correct! I'll die on that hill. :-)

But fr, I wonder if the stupid one-space approach is partially why so many yoots can't seem to tell when to use a comma and when to use a period - they have lacked an additional visual association that would underscore the difference and reinforce when to use which. And they also don't read enough real books.

Pure speculation, but I'm equally dismayed by single-spacing and comma splices, so I've sewn them together with my theory.

Nick will be a convicted Felon until the probationary period is over and the charge is expunged
No, he will not be a convicted anything. It's a stay of adjudication and basically puts conviction in abeyance. He'll be under court jurusdiction but not convicted. If he completes, charges are dismissed. No criminal conviction, and can have his records expunged after applicable periods (link says auto-expunge a year after diversion completion, but that section also specifies that the offense not be a felony, so he might have to wait the standard 5 years for a 3rd degree felony).
 
"on [the news] for pleading guilty" does not imply that he "plead guilty in court".

Do you mind explaining if this is a bit or if you are actually this stupid?
These retards are likely in some discord server doing all this gay retard shit, they shat up DSP chat a few times with their retarded, low-IQ drivel as well. It's part and parcel being the follower of a low energy boring gambling addict that produces no real milk.

you plead guilty in court. Not on the news.
Was today's Duolingo achievement "get hyper factual about the meaning of words and engage in petty semantics"? I rate your attempt B-. Try harder next time to get S.
 
The only reason they are giving Nick such a good plea deal is because they know Nick loves BBC, and mutt's law would be a reward for Nick.

(Hypothetically, if Nick was sent to jail)
:really:"Oh boy, I don't have to put up with my wife or feed those stupid fucking kids anymore? And I get to be locked in building with sexually frustrated men?

I can't wait!"
 
"on [the news] for pleading guilty" does not imply that he "plead guilty in court".

Do you mind explaining if this is a bit or if you are actually this stupid?

Was today's Duolingo achievement "get hyper factual about the meaning of words and engage in petty semantics"? I rate your attempt B-. Try harder next time to get S.

I totally agree with you @AltisticRight I dont know why he's so stuck in the semantics.

The only reason they are giving Nick such a good plea deal is because they know Nick loves BBC, and mutt's law would be a reward for Nick.
They know he's got an opening for another male in the polycule and don't want him using the jails to recruit! But now that he's successfully become the martyr for his two women, he'll likely use this to bring a third woman into the mix. The Nose stays winning.

At this rate he'll be onstream licking bottles of whiskey with women on his lap by Memorial Day.
 
It is objectively correct! I'll die on that hill. :-)

Notice also how the site automatically alters your own posts from the one last bastion that was APA Style Manual 6th Edition backed by science to the utterly benighted barbarism that has been the Chicago Manual (and APA 7th Edition apostasy that I'd just as soon pretend never happened), unless you deploy embedded PNGs to get around it.
APA6thSpace.png
Null does enjoy his petty torments.
 
Barnes said that Nick was 100% innocent, the warrant was bad and would be tossed, and Nick would beat all the charges. Barnes was more off the mark than the people who were thinking/hoping Nick would go to jail. Barnes was perhaps one of the most wrong lawtubers.

Try again, Viva.
I legitimately want to know what Viva means by "Barnes was right"
 
I legitimately want to know what Viva means by "Barnes was right"
Like every other lawtuber, Barnes probably made one couching statement when no one else was watching saying that this was a possibility. A lot easier to say you were right when you take every likely outcome as a position at least once.

Or he told Viva that, but told his audience the opposite.
 
I legitimately want to know what Viva means by "Barnes was right"
"Barnes was right" is a stupid meme among the Barneswalkers. He is, in fact, frequently wrong.

His ranting about the warrant was, in some ways, even more embarrassing than Rekieta's. Rekieta spoke with some at least some vagueness on the topic, whereas Barnes spoke with absolute certainty. Mis-citing nearly every Constitutional amendment while doing so.

Barnes is a joke, and Viva is his lapdog.

Didn't Barnes say the warrant would be tossed out? Instead it got affirmed and Nick plead guilty
Yes, and yes

EDIT: Word order.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
No, he will not be a convicted anything.
What the fuck is that system.

That is way too lenient, for the duration of the diversion he should be treated as the criminal he is.

Didn't Barnes say the warrant would be tossed out? Instead it got affirmed and Nick plead guilty
Barnes not only said the warrant would get tossed, he also claimed the Frank's motion would go through and completely dismantle the state's case.
 
What the fuck is that system.

That is way too lenient, for the duration of the diversion he should be treated as the criminal he is.
It streamlines the process if you do blow the deferred adjudication, more than the usual diversion agreement where you plead guilty to nothing and then if you blow that, you go back to trial. If he blows the deferred adjudication, then they can just go directly into entering the adjudication. He's already pled to it.
Barnes not only said the warrant would get tossed, he also claimed the Frank's motion would go through and completely dismantle the state's case.
Barnes is a bloviating stuffed shirt phony and has gone out of his way to make that abundantly clear.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Didn't Barnes say the warrant would be tossed out? Instead it got affirmed and Nick plead guilty

Surely his cope can always be that the warrant would have been tossed out if Nick had petitioned the Minnesota Supreme Court for review of the Minnesota Court of Appeals' affirmance, if Nick had petitioned SCOTUS for certiorari to reverse the Minnesota Supreme Court, if Nick had petitioned the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota for a writ of habeas corpus, if Nick had appealed denial of habeas corpus to the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals, and if Nick had petitioned SCOTUS for certiorari to reverse the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals.

Because Nick was too much of a pussy to try each and every one of the above, Barnes can forever rest soundly in the knowledge that the warrant would have been tossed out and Barnes would have been proven right had Nick not been such a pussy.

Nick L, Barnes W.
 
What the fuck is that system.

That is way too lenient, for the duration of the diversion he should be treated as the criminal he is.

A felony conviction doesn't mean much of anything anymore in Minnesota in any case. About all not tagging with the felony means for Nick is that he gets his guns and his gun rights back.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole