State of Texas v. Riley Dalton Mix (a.k.a. Youngclippa)

[MisterCH 86]

I don't exactly disagree with you that Riley should have gotten a proper warning, but the judge quashed the information regarding the supposed threat of bodily harm made. Since they have not filed anything new, they either do not have enough information to prove that claim, or they are past a deadline to modify the charges.

If they lack the evidence to support the claim and cannot specify it properly, then the case was fucked from the start.
If they failed to file properly and did a hack job writing the submitted filings, then the DA is incompetent and should be fired.

Right now we do not know which is correct, but if what you claim is accurate, then it could be #2 and that would be real stupid.

I really recommend you go back in the thread and read the motion to quash. With the extra info that the motion was granted as to 1A and 3, it should be enlightening.

[EDIT]: TL;DR in case you are too lazy. All information regarding harassing statements containing threats to cause bodily injury were quashed. That likely killed the case.

Actually from what I understand they quashed the original charge and they're refiling it. So they may not have dismissed it exactly, if anything they're refiling it because they screwed up the first time. That was already established. Also the charge was for harassment, it had nothing to do with threatening bodily harm to my knowledge. The case wasn't dismissed, if anything they're just dismissing that charge so they can refile it.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Actually from what I understand they quashed the original charge and they're refiling it. So they may not have dismissed it exactly, if anything they're refiling it because they screwed up the first time. That was already established.

I do not know Texas criminal procedures, but should they not be able to amend the charges?
If it is all about how poorly written it is, then it should not be hard to fix.

If the problem is that they cannot be more specific in their language because they lack the evidence to support it, then I really wonder why the case has gotten this far.

 

[MisterCH 86]

I do not know Texas criminal procedures, but should they not be able to amend the charges?
If it is all about how poorly written it is, then it should not be hard to fix.

If the problem is that they cannot be more specific in their language because they lack the evidence to support it, then I really wonder why the case has gotten this far.

I'm not going to repeat the part about the evidence to you again. However the motion to quash was just to dismiss THAT specific charge so they can refile it the right way. That was already confirmed, so I don't know what they're hoping to do but it's not going to work in their favor. It's still going ahead and I guess they will find out when the trial happens. Oh well they can have their little fake victory, they're going to be very upset in the future.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

I don't know how people feel about Kino Casino here, but I will say this.... They've been very informative as well as entertaining.

From what I heard from Kino Casino it was filed but there was a mix-up and it had to be refiled. I don't think the judge is going to dismiss it, not without Eric being there to make sure Riley doesn't do anything like that again. At least I hope not, otherwise Riley's going to do everything he did again. He won't learn from his mistakes and he'll probably gaslight himself into thinking they allowed him to do this.

I didn't think my opinion of Kino Casino could get any worse but seeing you cite them as reliable source on legal analysis and commentary may just do it.

The "mix-up" was the complaint was poorly drafted and had to be corrected. Riley filed a motion to quash and won on 2 of the issues he raised, and those issues would have to have been rectified for the case to continue.

It appears they decided to cut bait instead.

It's still going ahead and I guess they will find out when the trial happens.

What's your source? Is your source Andy Warski the cokehead with his eyes bulging from drug abuse?

 

[Fleetwood]

I watched @Potentially Criminal appearance with Fag Tony

Can confirm Fag Tony and his chat read the farms and are big mad about it.

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

From what I heard from Kino Casino

My nigga...

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Internet is not real life. I don't get concerned unless it becomes that. The guy maybe retarded but he can also pose as a danger if he wanted to

It's a nothing burger. I looked up the case myself, it's still going. He still scheduled for trial. If anything they are celebrating it way too soon. According to Kino Casino there's some mix up when the lawyer filed for it so they have to refile. It's still going and it doesn't look like it was dismissed at all.

https://apps2.collincountytx.gov/JudicialOnlineSearch2/case/3af05fae-90ee-48d8-81dc-5fc9cb515df2

It's right here if anyone wants to see it.

I don't know how people feel about Kino Casino here, but I will say this.... They've been very informative as well as entertaining.

What Riley NEEDS is to be punished for once. I don't care how small or insignificant this case is, he's not going to learn anything from this. Granted it wasn't Eric's case, but the fact that they're being soft on him is a terrible idea. They basically gave him the idea that if he does it again, they're going to do the same thing.

This guy cares WAY too much...

I'm not going to repeat the part about the evidence to you again. However the motion to quash was just to dismiss THAT specific charge so they can refile it the right way. That was already confirmed, so I don't know what they're hoping to do but it's not going to work in their favor. It's still going ahead and I guess they will find out when the trial happens. Oh well they can have their little fake victory, they're going to be very upset in the future.

Oh? So what is the source of them re-charging him?

 

[Potentially Criminal]

However the motion to quash was just to dismiss THAT specific charge so they can refile it the right way. That was already confirmed, so I don't know what they're hoping to do but it's not going to work in their favor. It's still going ahead and I guess they will find out when the trial happens. Oh well they can have their little fake victory, they're going to be very upset in the future.

Confirmed by who, PPP and Warski? I like then and live their showmanship, but this isn't an area where they have the inside info.

There's nothing to indicate why this was dismissed (but I have my theories) but there wasn't a filing accompanying it (which is what would logically happen). For whatever reason, the case got dumped.

You're the Mayor of Copenhagen.

It's over. Riley won.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Oh? So what is the source of them re-charging him?

Someone who actually cares that much to find out what their intention is could in theory contact the Collin County DA and ask them.
Might even get a straight answer.

Or wait with the rest of us until the judge rules on this motion, dismisses the case and wait for it to be refiled (which it won't).

[EDIT] @Potentially Criminal According to their case system the subpoenas were issued, but 3 of 4 were not served, among of which is Eric July. Which would support your theory that the witnesses do not intend to show up.

 

[Fleetwood]

This guy cares WAY too much...

The parasocial Eric July fans like this are what escalated this whole feud initially. Of course Riley took it to retarded extremes but the initial engagement was from Rippa defenders before Eric himself even commented.

You're the Mayor of Copenhagen.

He's the opposite of the host and chat last night who were Riley supporters. In the stream they detected some impartial rhetoric and started going at Sean for simping Eric July because he said Riley could have gotten in trouble. Once again the parasocial follower effect this time the anti-Eric July people simping for Riley.

Personally I called it that people were going overboard predicting jail time. I thought he would get a ticket fine. But the incompetence of the initial filing prevented even that. It's a blunder to not detail the specific crime that happened, Was it laziness and banking too much on thinking they would get a plea deal?

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

It's a blunder to not detail the specific crime that happened, Was it laziness and banking too much on thinking they would get a plea deal?

I read people talk about Riley supposedly being trespassed from the property and showing up again later.
If that had been the case, then he would have been charged with criminal trespass, which he was not.
That would have been a slam dunk conviction, because its a binary incident.

Was trespassed? Yes
Showed up again anyway? Yes
Case done.


The other stuff has big shades of grey because the prosecution has to prove that Riley intended to harass Eric July with his actions, that his threats of bodily harm were actually real and serious, and they failed to even specify which of the things he did qualified as any of those things.

It is either massively incompetent by the DA or the victims who initially reported the incidents promised evidence that never materialized.

 

[Fleetwood]

I read people talk about Riley supposedly being trespassed from the property and showing up again later.
If that had been the case, then he would have been charged with criminal trespass, which he was not.
That would have been a slam dunk conviction, because its a binary incident.

Was trespassed? Yes
Showed up again anyway? Yes
Case done.


The other stuff has big shades of grey because the prosecution has to prove that Riley intended to harass Eric July with his actions, that his threats of bodily harm were actually real and serious, and they failed to even specify which of the things he did qualified as any of those things.

It is either massively incompetent by the DA or the victims who initially reported the incidents promised evidence that never materialized.

It's a common tactic to go after errors in the filings to get a case dismissed. It has nothing to do with anything Riley did so that point is moot. If the charge was like trespassing said address of venue or violating contact order for Eric D July or something specific like that it would have been hard to disprove.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

If the charge was like trespassing said address of venue or violating contact order for Eric D July or something specific like that it would have been hard to disprove.

Yes, which is why I was wondering if the information in OP was incorrect. If he had committed criminal trespass it would have been a very easy case.

 

[Potentially Criminal]

[EDIT] @Potentially Criminal According to their case system the subpoenas were issued, but 3 of 4 were not served, among of which is Eric July. Which would support your theory that the witnesses do not intend to show up.

Which would make Eric July a bitch made faggot.

 

[Niggernerd]

Someone should just shoot Riley. He's a faggot

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Someone who actually cares that much to find out what their intention is could in theory contact the Collin County DA and ask them.
Might even get a straight answer.

Sounds like something a fanboy would do... @MisterCH 86 , you up?

Or wait with the rest of us until the judge rules on this motion, dismisses the case and wait for it to be refiled (which it won't).

This dismissal looks genuine. It matches the record and style.

I can get a copy later this week to verify, but I do not think it is really required.

[EDIT] @Potentially Criminal According to their case system the subpoenas were issued, but 3 of 4 were not served, among of which is Eric July. Which would support your theory that the witnesses do not intend to show up.
Wyświetl załącznik 6838737

Which would make Eric July a bitch made faggot.

The address for service is the warehouse location Riley turned up at twice, and the one who returned service is the manager of the location.

My guess is that the employees are ducking service, left, or have the day off. Eric might also be ducking, or he has not shown up at the warehouse for a while.

Edit: Missing word

 

[Fleetwood]

Someone should just shoot Riley. He's a faggot

If the same prosecutors are writing up the case there's a chance the gunman gets off scott free.


yes @cjflan32 you are big mad. 11 comments so far on that one youtube video. I'm sure there are more by the time I hit post reply. The countless hours of Fagatony videos are a much deeper obsession over this subject than the >200 messages on this thread. It's people like him and his followers that make me not care wtf Eric does because of how evidently pathetic the people who watch Eric's every move are. You people let it take over your whole lives. People on the farms might have laughed at Eric a few years ago if they didn't have to be associated with your crew by doing that.

 

[AnOminous]

It's a blunder to not detail the specific crime that happened, Was it laziness and banking too much on thinking they would get a plea deal?

Apparently they alleged recklessness and then cited absolutely no facts to support it. Why not intentional harassment? It was obvious on its face that he was there intentionally. He didn't just accidentally show up dressed like a retard and harass people.

Anyway, they blew it.

Or conceivably, Eric July not being willing to show up (or that if he did show up he would testify that he was not in fact scared of a smelly fat midget) made it no longer worth pursuing. Actual subjective fear is not actually an element of the offense, otherwise you could just argue well, this is a tough guy so I can harass him all I like, but it doesn't really make an enticing case.

So all we really know is their initial filing was basically dogshit and got tossed, presumably with leave to amend it unless there's some deadline I missed, and then they have (apparently) decided not to pursue it and to dismiss instead.

They might have had some (non-stupid) reason for doing that, like they talked to EJ to get an idea what his testimony was going to be and he said something like "I'm not going to get up there and commit perjury and say I'm actually afraid of this sawed-off little runt."

We don't really know.

Which would make Eric July a bitch made faggot.

Or his testimony wouldn't have been of any use to them. So far as I know, he wasn't even aware of the situation until Riley was already getting busted. Or at least I don't know otherwise.

 

[Potentially Criminal]

Or his testimony wouldn't have been of any use to them. So far as I know, he wasn't even aware of the situation until Riley was already getting busted. Or at least I don't know otherwise.

If he ducked a subpoena, he's a bitch.

He can pursue whatever charges he wants but to be unavailable at the last minute is ridiculous.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

If he ducked a subpoena, he's a bitch.

He can pursue whatever charges he wants but to be unavailable at the last minute is ridiculous.

The State's MTD cites the quashing as the reason. I do not think it fair to impute any malice. In theory, however I agree.

Based on the available options, however, and the record, it seems the State does not have the desire or motivation to emend the charges. A lazy prosecutor has more factual basis.