💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Desktop User2]

What drives somebody to be this defensive of Melton?

Shared sexual appreciation for kids.

 

[zimzam88]

I don't even know if he's lying to the audience or to himself.

When he did his crossdressing stream and took all of his kids toys he was drunk and the kids walked in on the stream confused. He's just a shitty disgusting liar about everything.

 

[demicolon]

What's the common denominator between drug cops, lab techs testing for drugs and the Rekieta children?

Denny's

 

[Mr E. Grifter]

Probably late but leading toxicology expert thinks you can piss hot from eating food seasoned with spirits:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=YGlxvEeL0rk
He really is incapable of understanding the concept of thresholds, isn´t he?
His notion of the world is incredibly childish... does he think drug tests are accepted as predictors of drug consumption without controlling for negligible exposure? Like everywhere in the world people recognize the predictive value of those tests but no one in the whole wide world has the same intelligence to question scenarios where a false positive could be returned and already accounted for it. He is really really dumb...

It's not even just threshholds when it comes to this stuff, lots of non-alcoholic food and drink have ABV around or above 0.5%. I think ketchup is about 0.67. Such a low amount of alcohol will be processed by your liver before it is able to have any sort of intoxicating effect. It is exactly the same when you cook with alcohol, a large amount will be cooked off and the rest will be so diluted by the other ingredients that the alcohol content would be too low to even make you intoxicated because you would never be able to consume it fast enough. If I remember rightly you really need to be drinking something over 1.5% ABV to get even slightly intoxicated.

It almost isn't even worth commenting on the utter garbage spewing out of his mouth about test results, but isn't it funny that his issue with tests is that you can't challenge their results by claiming that you never took drugs... That unlike the rest of this process, the results of the test are so black and white he cannot lie his way out of them. That's the real problem Nick has with the tests - he can't brow beat a lab tech into submission.

 

[Midnight Energy Drink]

I don’t know, I shouldn’t expect logical consistency from Rekieta at this point but it just popped into my head reading the second screenshot in your post.

Think about this: Rekieta drops a hundred dollars to a pedophile who harasses a child Nick took care of personally. Does it sound like a man of principles?

Imagine someone you know acted this way. Wouldn't you want to kick his ass?

Dude, have you seen Juju lately?

Wyświetl załącznik 6737821

At this point he's legally required to change his name to Fat Herrera.

 

[Mr E. Grifter]

Wyświetl załącznik 6737969
"false positive FOR USE."
Is this a backhanded admission that his daughter did ingest cocaine at some point, but now we are using the cope of "she didn't use it voluntarily"? I seriously can't keep up with the different lies and excuses Nick uses just on this one issue, never mind the myriad of other lies and copes he uses about everything else in his life.

It appears that he is trying to say that the test was a false positive for the ingestion of cocaine by his daughter, and that instead the "exposure" was by cops who had touched his daughter after taking cocaine.

The interesting part here is that the narrative this comment is trying to establish is itself inconsistent. If the results are a false positive for use, then he is confirming that the test results that came back are what the lab would consider indicative of drug use - that she ingested cocaine. Meanwhile he is saying any exposure - not ingestion - of cocaine would of come from the cops. Yet the test never indicated exposure, it indicated that the drugs had been ingested, due to the metabolites within the hair follicles.

Yet again this is just a Crackeita bait and switch where he thinks he is the smartest man in the room. The cops touching her hair is a red herring, and his word games demonstrate that he knows this to be the case. He seems to be leaving himself some wiggle room, so that he can say "Oh I never said she used cocaine because of the cops".

He is going to hate the next few years of his miserable existence being a dry drunk. Poor kids.

 

[Captain Manning]

I'll be a nice guy and give Nick credit for one thing he said to Dick the other day:

I think he is actually correct that the obsession some have with bringing back terrestrial shock jock radio is fucking dumb. I've made that argument myself a number of times.

But that's not even a uniquely Aaron problem. That's a Dabbleverse problem. And he's not even consistent about it. Nick will shit on Aaron and Zumock, but go on a show with Karl, Moody, Melton, and that stupid puppet.

Not to mention it's basically Juju's gimmick too.

 

[Folgers Can]

This is a VERY interesting titbit. Does it also apply to concurrent sentencing? What if Nick is convicted of both counts in the same trial? Does the second get a higher criminal history score?

My logic says, 'no', because that could be gamed, but I want to be sure.

That's a whole other can of worms but in short his criminal history score will be the same regardless of how many convictions result from the Kandiyohi County case. This would not be because the sentences are concurrent or because they will have been imposed at the same time for an offense committed at the same time, as that argument has been attempted on similar facts and failed:

Appellant argues that her convictions stem from a single behavioral incident, and therefore, her sentence for sale of methamphetamine and child endangerment was improper. We disagree. "f a person's conduct constitutes more than one offense under the laws of this state, the person may be punished for only one of the offenses. . . ." Minn. Stat. § 609.035, subd. 1 (2004). The defendant may not be sentenced for two or more offenses that were committed as part of the same behavioral incident. State v. Norregaard, 384 N.W.2d 449, 449 (Minn. 1986).

Whether multiple offenses arose out of the same behavioral incident depends on the facts of each case. State v. Bookwalter, 541 N.W.2d 290, 294 (Minn. 1995). In determining whether two convictions arose out of a single behavioral incident, we are to consider time, place, and whether the offenses were motivated by a desire to obtain a single criminal objective. State v. Richardson, 633 N.W.2d 879, 888 (Minn. 2001). We must also consider whether the offenses "(1) arose from a continuous and uninterrupted course of conduct, (2) occurred at substantially the same time and place, and (3) manifested an indivisible state of mind." State v. Johnson, 653 N.W.2d 646, 651-52 (Minn.App. 2002).
...
Sale of methamphetamine and child endangerment are different in nature and require proof of different elements. See Minn. Stat. § 152.022, subd. 1 (2002) (controlled substance crime); Minn. Stat. § 609.378, subd. 1(b) (2002) (child endangerment). The sale of the methamphetamine resulted from a single incident, and the child endangerment resulted from an ongoing course of conduct. See State v. Scott, 298 N.W.2d 67, 68 (Minn. 1980) (holding that where possession of burglary tools occurred on different date than burglary, defendant could be sentenced for both offenses). The district court did not err by imposing multiple sentences for sale of a controlled substance and child endangerment.

State v. Jackson, No. A05-247, (Minn. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2006)

Instead, his criminal history score will be limited to the felony drug charge because the child endangerment gross misdemeanor and the gun gross misdemeanor won't add up to the four needed to count:

“Under the sentencing guidelines, "[p]rior gross misdemeanor and misdemeanor convictions count as units comprising criminal history points. Four units equal one criminal history point; give no partial point for fewer than four units." Minn. Sent. Guidelines 2.B.3 (Supp. 2017).”

State v. Biby, No. A19-1551, 16 (Minn. Ct. App. Jul. 6, 2020)

As a result, he would get a criminal history score of 1.5 from the second-degree possession conviction only:

(LINK)


Then, when walking into the Stearns County case with a criminal history score of 1.5, that and any new Stearns County convictions' respective severity levels would be factored into the guidelines grid to determine the new sentence. Unfortunately, even with the most optimistic interpretation of what sorts of offenses the Stearns County investigation could ever conceivably find, almost all of their severity levels on the grid are miniscule:

(LINK)


Cross-referencing those possible Stearns County severity levels with his criminal history score of 1.5 from the Kandiyohi County case, and assuming Stearns County investigators never find or successfully decrypt any proof of Nick having solicited death threats like the one that his mod ArtTheClown posted here (which would be the only conceivable scenario severe enough to trigger the 9-ponter above), it's pretty clear that he will once again face no incarceration even if he gets caught:

(LINK)


Even worse, there can be no doubt that any Stearns County sentence would also run concurrent with the Kandiyohi County sentence even though the facts and course of conduct in each case were so separate in time and place, because the Stearns County sentence lacks the presumptive imprisonment that would be a necessary prerequisite to the judge having discretion to stack the two sentences consecutively:

Criteria for Imposing a Permissive Consecutive Sentence. Consecutive sentences are permissive (may be given without departure) only in the situations specified in this section.

(1) Specific Offenses; Presumptive Commitment. Consecutive sentences are permissive if the presumptive disposition for the current offense(s) is commitment, as outlined in section 2.C, and paragraph (i), (ii), or (iii) applies. If the court pronounces a consecutive stayed sentence under one of these paragraphs, the stayed sentence is a mitigated dispositional departure, but the consecutive nature of the sentence is not a departure. The consecutive stayed sentence begins when the offender completes the term of imprisonment and is placed on supervised release.

(i) Prior Felony Sentence. ․

(ii) Multiple Current Felony Convictions. If the offender is being sentenced for multiple current felony convictions for crimes on the list of offenses eligible for permissive consecutive sentences in section 6, the convictions may be sentenced consecutively to each other.

(iii) Felony Conviction After Escape (Non-Executed Sentence).

Minn. Sent'g Guidelines 2.F.2.a. (emphasis added).

Arola Johnson relies on the first sentence of 2.F.2.a.(1) italicized above. He contends that permissive consecutive prison sentences are not authorized in this case because the presumptive sentence for each of his offenses is a stayed sentence, not an executed sentence that would require his commitment. In response, the state relies on the second sentence of 2.F.2.a.(1) italicized above. The state contends that the second sentence authorizes permissive consecutive sentences in this case because it provides that a consecutive sentence is “not a departure” and, thus, it is unnecessary for the district court to state reasons for a departure.

We interpret section 2.F.2.a.(1) in the manner urged by Arola Johnson. The general rule of section 2.F.2.a.(1) is contained in its first sentence, which has two requirements: first, that the presumptive sentence is an executed sentence and, second, that one of the three following paragraphs applies. Id. The first requirement of the first sentence is not satisfied because the presumptive sentence for each of Arola Johnson's offenses is a stayed sentence, not commitment. The second sentence of section 2.F.2.a.(1), on which the state relies, would apply only if the requirements of the first sentence were satisfied and only if the district court actually imposed consecutive permissive sentences. The second sentence does not limit or qualify the applicability of the first sentence and does not contain an independent authorization for permissive consecutive sentences; the second sentence merely determines the character of a stayed nature and the consecutive nature of consecutive permissive sentences.

State v. Arola Johnson, A23-0134 (Minn. Ct. App. December 4, 2023)

With all of that in mind, I'm increasingly convinced that the reason Nick and MAPton have been so brazen in publicly admitting guilt isn't because they don't think they'll get caught, but because Nick realized there would be no practical real-world consequences for him even when he gets caught. Whatever probationary period he gets in Stearns County will just be subsumed within the concurrent (and longer) probationary period that the Kandiyohi County conviction will have already put in place. In effect he loses nothing other than some Petrofac-bux tossed at whatever lawyer with a pulse cobbles together the Stearns County plea deal for him, and in exchange for incurring that mild annoyance he gains whatever mild embarrassment of Aaron he thinks he can achieve.

All that's missing at this point is leaking all the stolen files online like MAPton already threatened to do, which he should totally do RFN because there clearly won't be any consequences. Release the Kraken, Nick!

 

[Strix454]

Not to mention it's basically Juju's gimmick too.

Yeah. That was the sick irony of Nick's comments about Aaron and his format. Everything they said in criticism was equally or even more true of Juju & his format. Juju is as stale, nostalgic and dated in format as anything in the dabbleverse. The biggest difference is that Juju's dream is to be on TV like it was 20 years ago rather than being on radio like it was 20 years ago.

 

[Captain Manning]

All that's missing at this point is leaking all the stolen files online like MAPton already threatened to do, which he should totally do RFN because there clearly won't be any consequences. Release the Kraken, Nick!

PSA:

If Melton dumps an archive, I strongly recommend not downloading it. I know I wouldn't.

Let me count the ways. Even leaving aside the fact the files were obtained through illicit means, I can think of some not-at-all legal things Patty could put in such an archive. Things you wouldn't want touching your devices.

Yeah. That was the sick irony of Nick's comments about Aaron and his format. Everything they said in criticism was equally or even more true of Juju & his format. Juju is as stale, nostalgic and dated in format as anything in the dabbleverse. The biggest difference is that Juju's dream is to be on TV like it was 20 years ago rather than being on radio like it was 20 years ago.

Aaron wants to be Howard Stern or OnA.

JuJu wants to be Jerry Springer.

I don't think one is better than the other. They are both dated and suck, IMO.

 

[thebigdream]

Nick has no self-awareness. Nick sees his natural superiority in all aspects of life to be self-evident to any open-minded person presented with the true facts. Nick thinks of himself as magnetic gigachad. The idea of Nick being a skinny middle-aged nerd with nerd body, the idea of Nick coming across as really gay and the idea of Nick being a cuck are all completely absurd to Nick.

It's like he has body dysmorphia, but instead of it being (just) about weight, he literally can't perceive how much of whiney, nerdy faggot he comes across as to others. He is the poster child for people who need to be dunked in toilets and have their lunch money stolen, but when he looks in the coke dusted mirror in his pug feces-filled bathroom, he sees the coolest, gun-toting lolbertarian gigachad who ever lived. It's deranged.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Summary of Dick Show call-in:

Thanks for posting the audio segment.

After listening to it, it seems clear to me that Rekieta is ready to accept a plea deal, and one of his objectives/requests is for the State to drop of the child endangerment charge.

"I had a settlement conference. And so a settlement conference like nothing happens in the courtroom. The prosecution, the defense come to the courthouse and try and reach an agreement. We didn't reach an agreement, but we're really damn close." (elb clip timestamped)
"What they're gonna do is: they're going to drop the charges of child endangerment. They never could support them. There were no facts for it at all. So they know that none of that shit happened, but it was convenient for them to have that shit go into the public to put pressure on me and leverage my situation." (elb cip timestamped)

That sounds to me like he's saying: I care about my public image, and I want this charge dropped before I accept any plea deal.
I also found it interesting how he thinks everyone would want to live a hedonistic, degenerate life like his if they had the money:

"Like they, everyone knows this: money and opportunity eliminate moral boundaries. Like they redefine how you view life." (elb clip timestamped)
"That's why people hire a hooker or go to a strip club. Someone focuses on them and lies to them and makes them feel good. Everybody on earth wants that. You just don't have the money and opportunity to do it." (elb clip timestamped)

But the best quote, in my opinion, is this one:

"The only victim of anything I did is me." (elb clip timestamped)


EDIT:

X | A

 

[Captain Manning]

Well, somebody ain't happy with BBN:

Wyświetl załącznik 6737914

While at first blush you'd think it is a Balldoguard, it's more likely a Meltonite since it seems to spend most of its time attacking Aaron and sucking off fatso.

If I were a betting man, I'd put $5 on this being our old, and since site banned, "friend" Citizen M / @SaddamLanza. Despite the account creation date of March, the oldest existing tweet is October 23. Which is right around the time Melton got thread banned from the Melton thread again, followed by a site ban. Guess this is his coping mechanism.

These examples also sound a lot like them:
Wyświetl załącznik 6737975
Wyświetl załącznik 6737957
"NICK IS BAD, BUT AARON IS WORSE!" He's tried that several times here.

They previously claimed that BBN was @elb (who has posted clips of things critical of Patty, as well as a mirror of @Third World Aristocrat's excellent compilation of fatty being a creep towards kids), but then changed their mind to it being Faran right around the time @Gobermental Supervisor suggested that possibility in the Melton thread.

Wyświetl załącznik 6738001
Live link (Archive is borked ATM).

What drives somebody to be this defensive of Melton?

UPDATE:

BBN thinks it's formerly the Ranger_X account that rebranded. They could very be right.


(Archiving still borked for me, and it's likely not that important)

It's definitely one or more Meltonites though. I seldom encounter weirdos quite as weird as they are. They're even weirder than Balldoguards, if you ask me. Regular Balldoguards are in short supply these days, but Melton's involvement has caused a large infusion of weirdos whose main thing is to try and destroy Aaron for whatever reason.

 

[Procrastinhater]

I asked in Gunt chat, where the history & lore of the Sektur resides, & it’s been determined that the gunt reveal photo came from that guys twitter account. His moniker at the time was Mister Misanthropic.

Damn. Never heard of him. Its like he's an agent of the Kino Gods, appeared to drop the Gunt pic, an avatar of Chaos, and dissapeared back from wherever he came without a trace...

 

[Melty Butter]

I periodically check on Celeste's socials. Somehow I never noticed this.

Celeste, I think the Internet was trying to tell you something. (My red pen.)


(My first Rekieta-related laugh of the day.)

 

[RodgerDodger]

The CPS case didn't "close". Nick (likely) followed the plan negotiated with CPS and got custody of his kids back at the end of just about six months. And six months is just about as long as CPS can usually keep the kids away without CPS doing more drastic things in court. Keeping the kids away for the whole six months means that either (a) the parents are non-cooperative with the CPS plan or (b) they are total shit parents but not so evil that custody can be removed from them.

The idea of CPS cases "closing" definitively forever at a point in time is a self-serving idea that comes from Nick. And Nick is a habitual liar. Nick has continuously lied about everything to do with family court and CPS since he was arrested.

The last "win" Nick probably got in court was getting the family court records related to his family made non-public.

CPS cases only close definitively when all kids are 18+

 

[MeltyTW]

EDIT

Too late nick we saw you grovel and sniveling and exain to much how much of a NERD and a victimized squeaky voiced loser you are who can't get hard and needs an increasingly bizarre array of gadgets and do-hickies to emulate actual intercourse

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

This would not be because the sentences are concurrent or because they will have been imposed at the same time for an offense committed at the same time, as that argument has been attempted on similar facts and failed:

That's a situation nearly unique to meth offenses (and 2 others, neither of which apply). Sentencing Guidelines:

Assigning Felony Weights – Current Multiple Sentences. Multiple offenses
sentenced at the same time before the same court must be sentenced in the
order in which they occurred. As each offense is sentenced, include it in the
criminal history on the next offense to be sentenced (also known as
“Hernandizing”) except as follows:
(1) Single Course of Conduct / Multiple Sentences. When multiple current convictions arise from a single course of conduct and multiple sentences are imposed on the same day under Minn. Stats. §§ 152.137, 609.585, or 609.251, the conviction and sentence for the “earlier” offense does not increase the criminal history score for the “later” offense.
(2) Single Course of Conduct / Multiple Victims. When multiple current convictions arise out of a single course of conduct in which there were
multiple victims, weights are given only to the two offenses at the highestseverity levels.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Wow, I can't imagine why Nick thought going on The Dick Show a week prior to his settlement conference would be a good idea... but then again Nick doesn't think, Nick just does.

Nick saw his thead beginning to lose interest. As stupid as Balldo is, his need for attention compliments our need for drama in a delightful synergy.

 

[Desktop User2]

Apparently Nick´s eldest is either retarded or never used the Internet or watched a TV show because he wasn´t aware of what cocaine is and how to ingest it:

ETA: Nick is obviously lying.