💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
He's lying when he says he can make it very expensive for the state. All of his bullshit motions get bushed aside, and they got him dead to rights.
A trial is always expensive. It's a little less harsh on the state because they have a stable of experts who do cases in volume for less than a privately hired expert would get and this for a minor bullshit case likely to get nearly the same result in the end.

He can't break the bank, even of a small county DA, but it's enough to have a bit of leverage.

Now they can make it harder for him for doing that, like going hard on him over the "hacking" shit or requesting an upward deviation from sentencing guidelines, and retaliating against a potential witness in the case against him to attempt to obstruct justice would certainly be the sort of aggravating factor that would apply.

I'm not sure where in the process in Minnesota they're required to do that, but generally an upward deviation requires facts proven at trial beyond a reasonable doubt, so at the very latest, it would be before the finder of fact deliberates on the subject and might require a special jury questionnaire, since most jury forms simply have the option of "guilty" or "not guilty," and deviations require specific factual findings. (If it's the judge as fact-finder, the judge has to issue a written findings of fact.)

Now the state clearly has the best hand here, and if Nick tries to play 72 like it's aces, he's going to have a bad time, but he's not entirely without leverage. He just doesn't have much and they know it.
- It sure sounds like he failed at least one drug/alcohol test. He larps on about how they get the reports a week later, how the alcohol could be in a sauce from cooking. (I mean...)
B-b-b-but maybe I have an evil twin and it's his cocaine! Or. . .the cocaine gnomes left it!

God shut the fuck up Nick you cringy, embarrassing faggot.
 
He got sentenced to two months in federal prison, they confiscated his guns, and he's still a felon to this day. Rekieta has gotten off so much easier, and he still cries harder than Kyle ever did.
Unfortunately for Kyle, the "deep state" or whatever you want to call it actually WAS conspiring to get him.
I thought it was John Goodman @AnOminous
I stole it from Franken too.
 
Probably late but leading toxicology expert thinks you can piss hot from eating food seasoned with spirits:

He really is incapable of understanding the concept of thresholds, isn´t he?
His notion of the world is incredibly childish... does he think drug tests are accepted as predictors of drug consumption without controlling for negligible exposure? Like everywhere in the world people recognize the predictive value of those tests but no one in the whole wide world has the same intelligence to question scenarios where a false positive could be returned and already accounted for it. He is really really dumb...
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Just thought of this during my morning workout. Nick wants people to simultaneously believe 3 things related to his kids.
  1. They are all shockingly smart and talented, and are all way ahead of their peers in public school. They read a lot and know many things.
  2. Nick has previously said that he regretted his parents didn't let him know about sex stuff, and with the April tweets (that Nick wants to disavow) he has told his kids about sex stuff (so they can be cool).
  3. Somehow his kids are so sheltered that they don't know anything about drugs, so much so that the 17 year old young man didn't know cocaine was a powder and that you snort it.
How is it possible that Nick has bragged about how knowledgeable his kids are, has also regretted that his parents didn't teach him about more worldly things (like sex and sex toys) and also wants us to believe that his kids are so sheltered that they don't know anything about drugs and didn't understand why they were taken away from Nick and Kayla, and didn't understand what the problem was with the police?

Just saying I have known some extremely sheltered people in my life (like the kind growing up they weren't allowed to read Harry Potter) and they knew what drugs were and basic functions (like you snort cocaine and smoke meth).
 
Yes and yes.


According to Nick, no. Because Melton kisses the Lawpope ring. As does Ralph.


Dude, have you seen Juju lately?

Wyświetl załącznik 6737821

To answer your question simply, Nick doesn't really care what your body type is. You can be as fat as a whale, or thin as a meth head. What matters is whether you are sucking his dick or not.
Fat Fuck DiddlerDax can't stop pounding in those Double Doubles from In-N-Out by the looks of it.
 
Just thought of this during my morning workout. Nick wants people to simultaneously believe 3 things related to his kids.
  1. They are all shockingly smart and talented, and are all way ahead of their peers in public school. They read a lot and know many things.
  2. Nick has previously said that he regretted his parents didn't let him know about sex stuff, and with the April tweets (that Nick wants to disavow) he has told his kids about sex stuff (so they can be cool).
  3. Somehow his kids are so sheltered that they don't know anything about drugs, so much so that the 17 year old young man didn't know cocaine was a powder and that you snort it.
How is it possible that Nick has bragged about how knowledgeable his kids are, has also regretted that his parents didn't teach him about more worldly things (like sex and sex toys) and also wants us to believe that his kids are so sheltered that they don't know anything about drugs and didn't understand why they were taken away from Nick and Kayla, and didn't understand what the problem was with the police?

Just saying I have known some extremely sheltered people in my life (like the kind growing up they weren't allowed to read Harry Potter) and they knew what drugs were and basic functions (like you snort cocaine and smoke meth).
It doesn't make much sense. Also in an earlier cope, Nick said that his daughter has never seen cocaine. How does she know she hasn't seen (or used) cocaine, if she doesn't know what cocaine is
 
How does Nick still have Locals supporters? how does he still have people defending him? he's barely streamed in an entire year, you could probably count the number of times on both hands, there's no value return in supporting him unless you enjoy his (very) occasional seething butthurt streams. But more than that he's gone back on every belief and principle he once espoused, he's a hollowed out shell of man, a pathetic loser nerd trying desperately to be one of "the cool kids" while in his 40's. Who the heck is left for him and why?
Retards. As far as the eye can see.

Drugs?
 
Lester Burnham is Jesus (I don't understand this either)
In the words of Rev. Nicolas Robert Rekieta, Defender of the Faith He does the thing... before he does the thing
From translate.google.crackhead: Lester gets martyred by a Nazi for wanting to fuck Mena Suvari, but not really because he does not fuck her, but the intention counts, but ah fuck it this dumbass doesn't even understand American Beuty. Lester got killed by a closeted fag for rejecting his advances, not for scoring (or not) with Mena. How can you not get this?
 
1733862563095.png
"false positive FOR USE."
Is this a backhanded admission that his daughter did ingest cocaine at some point, but now we are using the cope of "she didn't use it voluntarily"? I seriously can't keep up with the different lies and excuses Nick uses just on this one issue, never mind the myriad of other lies and copes he uses about everything else in his life.
 
Ive always wondered who the guy throwing the horns next to JuJu the Cow (a man who likes to get fucked in the ass while dressed as a cow) is? Is the the only one immune to the Curse?
The first one to fall victim to it?
The creator of it?

So many questions.
I asked in Gunt chat, where the history & lore of the Sektur resides, & it’s been determined that the gunt reveal photo came from that guys twitter account. His moniker at the time was Mister Misanthropic.
:gunt:
 
The only way "false positive for use" would make sense is if the cops force-fed the kid with coke. Or another game of 315689164 questions where "false positive for use" means "she is not a drug user, it was an accident and well ackshually Pomplun tripped on a ziplock bad and it tore open and all coke flew into her mouth".

There's this thing called "Bayes Theorem" that mathematically-inclined people like lab technicians know about and know how to apply to tests that can show both false positives and false negatives. The chance of a kid testing OVER 9000 on a coke metabolite hair test, then test the same again, is about the same as BossmanJack scoring 5 blackjack hands at once.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 6737969
"false positive FOR USE."
Is this a backhanded admission that his daughter did ingest cocaine at some point, but now we are using the cope of "she didn't use it voluntarily"? I seriously can't keep up with the different lies and excuses Nick uses just on this one issue, never mind the myriad of other lies and copes he uses about everything else in his life.
No, he means she was contaminated by the cop handling the drugs.
 
Wow, I can't imagine why Nick thought going on The Dick Show a week prior to his settlement conference would be a good idea... but then again Nick doesn't think, Nick just does.
 
Wow, I can't imagine why Nick thought going on The Dick Show a week prior to his settlement conference would be a good idea... but then again Nick doesn't think, Nick just does.
For some reason, he still hasn't figured out that cops can use the Internet and see what he does there, even after what he does there got his house raided and his kids taken away.
 
Is his obsession with Aaron because he thinks he is punching down and by making him look bad, Nick would automatically look good?

Nick has no self-awareness. Nick sees his natural superiority in all aspects of life to be self-evident to any open-minded person presented with the true facts. Nick thinks of himself as magnetic gigachad. The idea of Nick being a skinny middle-aged nerd with nerd body, the idea of Nick coming across as really gay and the idea of Nick being a cuck are all completely absurd to Nick.

Therefore people making fun of him and not Aaron is obviously to Nick a problem of education and information. To Nick, if people just had the information on the "real Aaron", they would understand Aaron's inferiority to Nick and switch to all laughing at Aaron.

Nick is also, after all, a world class social media expert.
 
- All drug cops tested for drugs will look like they are using drugs
- All lab techs tested for drugs will look like they are using drugs
What's the common denominator between drug cops, lab techs testing for drugs and the Rekieta children?
- Nick's kids have NEVER seen Nick drunk.
I don't even know if he's lying to the audience or to himself. Even if he masterfully hid his drinking-till-blackout 5 times a week, his kids must've been retarded not to correlate the crankiness, apathy and slow reactions from dad with him smelling or sugar and old farts. Unless he's one of those "naw i totally don't get hungover" faggots that metabolize alcohol in the cloud.
 
Therefore people making fun of him and not Aaron is obviously to Nick a problem of education and information. To Nick, if people just had the information on the "real Aaron", they would understand Aaron's inferiority to Nick and switch to all laughing at Aaron.
He totally can't grasp the concept that you can think Aaron is kind of a piece of shit while thinking Nick is a much bigger piece of shit.
Unless he's one of those "naw i totally don't get hungover" faggots that metabolize alcohol in the cloud.
It's actually almost bad luck to have that, because not having to pay any real penalties for the boozing leads to no motivation to kick the habit, and eventually, when you're about Nick's age, it catches up to you fast and maybe you don't have a hangover as such, but you're still slow, stupid, belligerent, etc. and it's a 24/7 thing.
 
Well, somebody ain't happy with BBN:

Screenshot_20241210-130108~2.png

While at first blush you'd think it is a Balldoguard, it's more likely a Meltonite since it seems to spend most of its time attacking Aaron and sucking off fatso.

If I were a betting man, I'd put $5 on this being our old, and since site banned, "friend" Citizen M / @SaddamLanza. Despite the account creation date of March, the oldest existing tweet is October 23. Which is right around the time Melton got thread banned from the Melton thread again, followed by a site ban. Guess this is his coping mechanism.

These examples also sound a lot like them:
Screenshot_20241210-133313~2.png

Screenshot_20241210-131325~2.png
"NICK IS BAD, BUT AARON IS WORSE!" He's tried that several times here.

They previously claimed that BBN was @elb (who has posted clips of things critical of Patty, as well as a mirror of @Third World Aristocrat's excellent compilation of fatty being a creep towards kids), but then changed their mind to it being Faran right around the time @Gobermental Supervisor suggested that possibility in the Melton thread.

Screenshot_20241210-133130~2.png

Live link (Archive is borked ATM).

What drives somebody to be this defensive of Melton?
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole