💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[repentance]

>giving 100 bucks to a pedo because he a-logs your ex boyfriend
Nick is such a homo lol

I wonder how Nick would react if Melton started calling his 9 year old a coke whore.

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

Kayla's literally going with the strategy that Nick is an actor, and you could investigate Al Pacino for Scarface if you can investigate the live-streamer. It could have been drywall powder on Nick's nose...

I'm going to guess that the judge will see a difference between someone who is acting like a practicing lawyer and someone who is literally an actor purposefully portraying a character using drugs.

LOL NO WAY.
This whole thing is batshit crazy.
"Well it was an act, the coke had in the home was clearly method acting."

Doesn't matter. Probable cause is at the time of granting the warrant. If there was no probable cause, the warrant was invalid and the evidence doesn't get in. The problem is there was probable cause at that time.

The insane accusations against Aaron are still absolutely irrelevant to anything of importance. It was pure retardation to include that, presumably at the insistence of Balldo.

That's a lie. He's been seen gorging on an entire Dorito in one sitting.
kiwifags.mp4

This clip might get some serious use in the coming weeks.

From Melton's chat right now

Anathema.
FAGGOT PLEADING OUT LOL AHAHAHAH.
Not a good enough lawyer, not smart enough, and a coward at the end.
Cheers Rackets. You're guilty plead out like a lil bitch.

Its for the keedz right Crackets? Nah its because you know you'd lose. Cause you're guilty.
If it was for your kids you would have gotten clean and stopped drinking. You don't care about them.

Here is my final plea deal cope. Nick is playing 4d balldo chess with the Melton superchat to make us all THINK he's taking the plea deal when in fact he is actually going to trial! As a super lawyer he would always advise someone to take a good plea so he's doing just the opposite, thus outsmarting all of us stupid nerds!

Take that incel prudes!

That's too smart for Nick as I catch up on the thread reading this.
I'd love your cope to be real but that's too smart and charismatic for wetbrain skeletor.

My cope is the DA and Judge are so fucking sick of this guy acting like an asshole. No deal will be given. But I think the government is too lazy to do that sadly.

Jesus Christ, Nick I was JOKING when I said the thing about 4d chess!

Not skipping to the latest page in this thread is a CHALLENGE for me right now. My god things are getting exciting. I do not want to get my hopes up. I know its gonna be a plea.

ITS OUR CHRISTMAS PRESENT! WE HAVE BEEN GOOD KIWIS!

You ladies and gentlemen have me giggling in the final minutes of wrapping up work for the week.
Don't get my hopes up for him doing the dumbest shit imaginable.

He's pleading guilty and has informed the Court of this. They are ironing out the specifics.

He is 100% trying to get the bodycam footage hidden.
He does not want us to see his dirty crack shack.

GIVE HIM NOTHING YIELD NO GROUND DA. I BEG OF YOU. LET CHRISTMAS COME EARLY

Cross posting from Ralph’s case thread. Ralph has written a hilarious letter to the judge.

Wyświetl załącznik 6690102

The gunt getting a 50 state warrant was such a good present.
AH HAV CATS BISHHHHH.

He's got cats but no pussy.

Well he's the big pussy himself.

Been busy at work and catching up via highlights, so apologies if this was asked and answered. If Nick was actually going to plea out, why would Kayla have filed such a strange document just before anything happened? It doesn't make much sense, to me at least, to say he had something else on his nose and that all he does is performance art if Nick's going to turn around and just plea guilty.

Also goddamn of course nothing happens, it always seems to just be kicking the can further down the road with these lolsuits.

My only guess would be to attempt a business play at a better plea deal.

Come in, bang on your chest like you think you're hot shit and know something they don't.
Hope the DA doesn't want to deal with it and gives you a better plea.

````
Well I am now caught up. I hope the DA doesn't bend down and give him anything on pleas. They have an iron clad case against this loser. Take what they offer you rackets you're a loser and guilty.
We'll get that bodycam footage unless you fight and win!

 

[You're MDNWU]

I wonder how Nick would react if Melton started calling his 9 year old a coke whore.

It's just FUNNY and WEIRD, alright. It's that edgy humor that no one of you seem to get, ok. He was a REAL comedian like Juju. They know humor, they know jokes, you're all just incel prudes and dorks.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Nick will owe our wife half of everything he has, likely alimony, trust payments and probably child support. I highly doubt the non-practicing not lawyer at the time got our wife to sign a prenup. He'll absolutely be divorce raped by her unless he or april kill her.

First of all, no she wouldn't get half assets + his trust payments + alimony + child support.

What she should get is half of all marital property (adjusted through an equity lens; if he were to have hidden everything away from being strictly marital property, half of the three pennies he let exist in joint name would be unjust, for example).

As for spousal support, presumptions in MN are 0 if married under 5 years, transitional (1-2 years to allow supported spouse to train for/find work) for up to 20 years, and only permanent if 20+ years marriage. So in his case, yes.

Child support is for the children not the ex-spouse, and it is based on both parties' incomes and the parenting time split. Depending on how his money flows that could be not much. And it caps out around $3000/month based on the general calculator. I've showed calculations before if you care to hunt.



That's not a rape; that's reasonable*. Or, if you like, it's a case of "changed mind =/= rape."

*"I will be us."

But also, courts in MN have a strong preference for equal/close to equal parenting time.

And more importantly, they'd likely negotiate it, if his narcissism would allow it.

 

[Cringemaster Supreme]

Kayla is just gonna sit and take it while her non-practicing husband emotionally abuses her openly. They probably fuck right next to her in bed after she's gorged on pills to cope with what a pathetic waste of space she is. Poor widdle pill head. Maybe perhaps you'll choke on those pills someday and free up the world of what miserable garbage you are. You get what you deserve you dumb cuck bitch.

 

[DumbDude43]

Child support is for the children not the ex-spouse, and it is based on both parties' incomes and the parenting time split. Depending on how his money flows that could be not much. And it caps out around $3000/month based on the general calculator.

3k total, or 3k per child?

 

[Niggernerd]

Avgn: balls on the dick
Nick: balls in the balldo

 

[Captain Manning]

I wonder how Nick would react if Melton started calling his 9 year old a coke whore.

He wouldn't give a shit as long as Melton doesn't accuse him of giving her the coke.

He pretty clearly doesn't care about Melton saying awful things about children in general.

You think Nick loves his kids? Ha!

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Also may explain why no final deal with Nick today. If Kayla's motion somehow managed to turn the world upside down and succeed, Nick's negotiation position is also improved, so kicking his stuff out a month allows time for the Court to rule on Kayla's motion, whereas he's already lost his challenge of the warrant so no downside potential on that.

It would be very optimistic to expect a ruling on Kayla's motion will come by Nick's new settlement conference date. It's scheduled for a week after the deadline for the state to respond.

I'm curious what happened at the last minute to scuttle a deal, since it seemed to me that Nick was hinting strongly for some time that he was going to accept the deal.

 

[john marston]

I wonder how Nick would react if Melton started calling his 9 year old a coke whore.

He didn't care when Ethan Ralph called his retarded, why would that be any different?

 

[Folgers Can]

If Nick was actually going to plea out, why would Kayla have filed such a strange document just before anything happened?

Never forget that it was Kayla's attorney, not the court, that conveniently set her briefing deadline exactly one day before Nick's hearing:

To whatever extent the defendants coordinate on strategy somewhat (which would not necessarily be unethical especially if it went through White instead of from Nick directly), it's not a stretch to think it was intentional to select that date so that the last-minute filing of Kayla's brief on Monday night could be used by Nick and White as a cudgel in backroom negotiations with the prosecution on Tuesday.

In that sense Nick's statement in that $100 superchat to the nonce would have been more or less accurate: he was going into that hearing with every intention to eventually plea, but because he always has to be the smartest guy in the room, he still planned on putting the screws to the state one last time about any "changed circumstances" like what could happen to his chances on appeal if Kayla's hours-old motion brief prevails, not to mention him likely thumping his chest about what could happen to Aaron's credibility on cross-examination if he gets pinched for what Nick (per his tweet today) at least thinks was an HRO violation just this morning (which it wasn't).

In his mind there was at least some chance of some small W to brag about to his whores or to the iInternet if that last-minute brinksmanship could eke one last marginal concession out of the state to make the deal happen, like shaving off a year or two of the probation period, or like dropping the child endangerment charge only while keeping sentencing unchanged, or like shaving alcohol only off the list of things to be tested for during probation, etc.

Instead, there's nothing we're seeing that's inconsistent with the possibility that the state balked and said "fine, if you really think these changed circumstances matter, then how about we just postpone until the outcome of Kayla's motion and the outcome of Aaron's case are resolved, and then you can come back and do the same deal that was already on the table before today." Thus the new settlement conference is scheduled to December 17th, which is exactly 8 days after the state's brief on Kayla's motion is taken under advisement, for what should be an unusually quick decision from Wentzell since it's the second time rehashing old issues:

Even better, December 17th would be 6 days after revelation of Aaron's own plea deal at his December 11th hearing, which he seems to think will be so plainly final that he's already gleefully gloating about being able to speak freely about Kayla after that date:

1:00

Sammich Enthusiast: [unintelligible] is gettin' too cold for naked twister. People are gonna stick together, that's not good.
Aaron: You know what I used to say in my old friend group, it's never too cold for naked twister.
Sammich Enthusiast: Especially if you do some snow angels?
Aaron: After December 11th, Sean, after December 11th.
Sammich Enthusiast: *laughs* December 11th.

So then the real question becomes this: even if Nick truly had every intention to plead out under the original offer's terms or with whatever marginal concessions he tried to get today, will he really be able to go through with it on December 17th in the midst of seething at what a shocking slap on the wrist his nemesis just got on December 11th, and outright malding at his nemesis' suddenly "unshackled" gloating and shit-talking that would surely ensue in the 6-day interim? Or will that get his rage boiling over to the point that he tells the state to shove their deal up their collective ass and takes this to trial like a man, just to grasp for any slim chance at getting less punishment than his ex-boyfriend did?

 

[RotPockets]

I asked Grok to tell me about Lord Balldo, these were the results:

Based on the information available from online sources, here is an account of how Nicholas Rekieta's public image shifted following his association with the "Balldo":

**Initial Context:**
Nicholas Rekieta, known online as Rekieta Law, was initially recognized for his legal commentary, especially during high-profile cases like the Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard trial and the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. He built a significant following on platforms like YouTube, where he discussed legal matters with a libertarian perspective.

**The Balldo Incident:**
The narrative starts with Rekieta discussing and promoting the "Balldo," a unique sex toy designed to use the testicles for penetrative sex, during one of his streams or discussions. This was not just a fleeting mention but became a recurring topic, which surprised and entertained some of his audience while alienating others.

- **Online Perception Shift:** The term "Balldo" became synonymous with Rekieta among his followers and detractors. Discussions about the Balldo on platforms like Kiwi Farms and Reddit led to him being labeled as a "degenerate" by some, particularly those who found such topics inappropriate or excessively hedonistic for a figure previously known for legal analysis.

**Public Reaction and Consequences:**

- **Kiwi Farms Discussions:** On forums like Kiwi Farms, where internet personalities are often dissected, Rekieta's streams discussing the Balldo were highlighted as part of a broader narrative of his "descent" into what some described as degeneracy. Comments often focused on how this contrasted with his earlier, more serious content, suggesting a shift in his public persona from a legal commentator to someone engaging in what was perceived as vulgar or inappropriate content.

- **Community Response:** Within the communities that followed him, there was a split. Some found the humor in his new direction, enjoying the shock value and the meme culture it spawned. Others felt it was a degradation of his brand, pointing out the incongruity with his previous image as a family man and legal expert.

- **Crossover with Other Personalities:** His association with figures like Dick Masterson and his involvement in various online dramas, including with other YouTubers and personalities, further fueled this narrative. The Balldo became a sort of meme or shorthand for his new public image among internet circles.

**Later Developments:**

- **Legal and Personal Issues:** Over time, Rekieta's life and streams took a darker turn with his arrest for drug possession alongside his wife in 2024, which was widely discussed online. This event, coupled with previous behaviors like the Balldo discussions, painted a picture of a significant personal and professional decline.

- **Public Fall from Grace:** The once-respected legal commentator was increasingly viewed through the lens of his personal controversies, with many linking this to his earlier shift towards more explicit and controversial content.

**Summary:**
The moment Rekieta started openly discussing and promoting the Balldo marked a turning point in how he was perceived online. It transitioned his image from a legal commentator to someone involved in what some segments of his audience considered inappropriate or degenerate content, contributing to his later legal and personal troubles. This narrative was heavily influenced by online communities and forums where his actions were scrutinized and often exaggerated for dramatic effect.

I was pleased to see Kiwi Farms given proper credit for the dissemination of degeneracy.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

3k total, or 3k per child?

Total. I ran a simplified worst-case scenario (worst = worst outcome for monied spouse: very high income by Spouse A, 0 income for Spouse B, 5 kids, no parenting time at all for A, no spousal support from A to B, no healthcare costs paid by A - bc parenting time can lower amount owed and so potentially would spousal support and insurance).

Throw all that in and total calculation = $3359/month total.

Here you go: https://childsupportcalculator-beta.dhs.state.mn.us/

Now, would a court find that equitable? I would hope not (that's just the snack budget!), but that is the baseline max.

Note: The calculator caps out at around $150k/year income to the higher-earning spouse, so it's ridiculous in hnw divorces with a large gap between the spouses. And family courts are hybrid law-equity, so a court could order more (or less) than baseline, but baseline sets expectations, and you have to (successfully) argue or agree to departures.

Child support isn't always awarded. If parents earn about even, it will show at or around zero. And if you put in $0 income for one and a moderate amount for the other, even if the earner wants nothing to do with the kids, you can see as little as $50/month.

 

[Chazzed Up]

Kayla is just gonna sit and take it while her non-practicing husband emotionally abuses her openly. They probably fuck right next to her in bed after she's gorged on pills to cope with what a pathetic waste of space she is. Poor widdle pill head. Maybe perhaps you'll choke on those pills someday and free up the world of what miserable garbage you are. You get what you deserve you dumb cuck bitch.

Take it easy, Nick.

 

[Captain Manning]

I'm curious what happened at the last minute to scuttle a deal, since it seemed to me that Nick was hinting strongly for some time that he was going to accept the deal.

I think he was prepared to accept a deal today, but he was hoping he could convince them to agree to a something a little less bitter in the 11th hour, and they told him no dice.

Basically what @Folgers Can just said. He's gotta try and have the last word and claim some sort of W from this mess. Otherwise people will just (rightfully) assume he rolled over because he has no defense.

The thing is, Nick doesn't have the state over a barrel. The state has Nick over a barrel. He's pushing his luck when has little leverage.

The judge might have given him till next month to decide if he wants to pull his head out of his ass.

That's my theory anyways. No idea how accurate it is.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

It would be very optimistic to expect a ruling on Kayla's motion will come by Nick's new settlement conference date. It's scheduled for a week after the deadline for the state to respond.

Oops! Thanks!

I'm curious what happened at the last minute to scuttle a deal, since it seemed to me that Nick was hinting strongly for some time that he was going to accept the deal.

4D.

 

[hunchbacksrus]

Tbh, I hope Balldo refuses for a while and for Mt. Graph to go on a justified legal crusade to make ‘m bend over for the money. Would be funnier

The best thing is he refuses and they hit him and fat fuck Melton with the cybercrimes charges then he goes straight to prison as he violated his parole

 

[Chug Smuckle]

More time to fuckup, rack up more charges and piss off the court.

 

[BigPeanut]

Know how to multi-quote! Just a bad habit to double-post

Don’t worry about it, it’s the janny’s job to clean it up anyway. they have to earn whatever amount it is that Josh pays them!

 

[parsnip]

Can the prosecutor bring up that Nick didn't use the "I'm an actor" defense for his own request to void the search warrant? Did he forget he was only acting until after his attempt to get the warrant thrown out failed? Was he also acting when the church members and Kayla's family members thought he was on drugs? Was he pretending to do lines in front of Aaron for months? He's either the greatest method actor of all time or a lying liar who lies.