Democratic National Convention 2024

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia

Who wins the nomination

  • Kamala Harris

    Głosy: 835 33,9%
  • Hillary Clinton

    Głosy: 182 7,4%
  • Gavin Newsom

    Głosy: 123 5,0%
  • Some black woman or gay man

    Głosy: 728 29,6%
  • Taylor Swift

    Głosy: 464 18,8%
  • Other

    Głosy: 130 5,3%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    2 462
W was never an idiot nor a simpleton. He was very intelligent. He simply spoke in a very relaxed and casual manner, which is contrary to how most presidents speak. He was the 'man who was unpresidential' before Trump.
That's Bush Sr., not W. Look, we must use Occam's Razor and explain it like it is: Liberalism was in full swing during W's tenure, most young people grew to dislike the religious right due to their fumbles during the 90s and 80s, and most of acamedia and MSM was already leaning very liberal. W had his problems and lackings, like all persons, but those were lackings which were magnified by an unfavorable enviroment and his inability to successfully fight back aganist such enviroment
 
I gave $10K to Joe Biden.
I am not "dirt floor poor" or anything, but now I'm thinking about what I would do if someone gave me $10K. I could use it to pay off my car, as a down payment for a real house, pay my medical bills and then use the leftovers for something cool I've always wanted, or maybe split it with my mother who could use it.

But nah, this nigga gave his $10K to Joseph "Dark Malarkey Ice Cream" Biden.
 
We don't even know if Biden is alive or dead, this is genuine banana republic shit :story: :story: :story:

This is bullshit. Biden released those delegates, they shouldn't go to ANYONE until the convention. This is undemocratic; you can't just barter away people's votes; I hope The Heritage Foundation fucks the DNC into the dirt for the next four years over this.
There is a lawyer by the name of Adam Bonin. You can find him on Xitter.

I know him.

He has been preparing for this very moment. They have a legal network and have been advising the DNC on their calls. They are fully prepared for Heritage to lawbomb them.
 
Not sure if I am on the same wavelength as most of the Kiwis on here but I wasn't expecting the 2024 election to be serious and more and more my expectations have been met on that regard.

Politics in the West have become Oligarchs creating "serious guys" vs "over the top populists" in clown shows for the masses to vote for. Whether the stage managed harlequin who promises change is your guy/girl, or the respectable suit the media swoons for that your boomer mom thinks will save the country from, other respectable suits, nothing is going to change.

We should all just purchase our tickets and enjoy the circus. It's certainly not something worth losing a uterus
over

1721615400921.png
 
I'll never understand how the left got chained to furries and trannies

Bro I just want strong unions, workers rights and state funded education

fuck sake
Because that's what retards want. What are furries and trannies? Retards.

Unions so that they can't be fired for being retarded. Workers rights so they can be retarded at work and not get fired and state funded education so they can spend as much of someone else's money as they want to try and not be retarded.
 
I really don't get the fascination with the bible. US right's only mainstream Christian position right now is its support of Israel. Abortion is still kinda relevant in a few midwestern states but I think even most conservatives support abortion for incest, rape, danger to the mother, and nonviable fetuses.

It just sounds so outdated. It's like listening to someone rant about the Masons. Panic about freemasons is a boomer thing, along with UFOs. It's not really a contemporary fear. The Christian Right is dead.
Western Christianity is mostly dead right now. Most "Christians" across the west have the most shallow conception of Christianity, essentially boiling down to "Jesus says to, like, be nice and eat your vegetables and stuff"
At this point the Catholic Church (in the US at least) is the only explicitly anti-abortion denomination. The others are mixed church-by-church, but on average are either pro abortion or view it as a problem that can be solved by throwing more birth control at it.
 
I mean, what is honestly the point of primaries if these people were going to vote for the party no matter what? It's just like with black people. I'm sure some black folks will be pissed that Biden isn't the nominee, but who cares if you're still automatically voting Democrat regardless?
This stunt only proves that the primaries are just a show anyway, which has been evident since 2016 at a minimum. What's crazy is that if they decide to go ahead and remove DNC primaries entirely and just independently nominate the presidential candidate (which I believe they should be able to do, since it technically means nothing), the Vote Blues will just insist that this makes the Dems better, because it protects them from rogue elements like Trump getting the nomination. The DNC will protect them and ensure that they only get a good candidate to vote for going forward.
Wyświetl załącznik 6218279
Patrick oinks that Biden will never drop out because only Nazis say he will.

Then he drops out and Patrick instantly supports Harris.

This man has no opinions of his own.
Vote Blue No Matter Whos do not use their brains. They are in a religious doomsday cult that believes only the Democrat party's annointed nominee can save them from genocide and mass poverty and world war. Because The Party is always right, if they suddenly change who they nominate, that change must also be correct. There can never be a bad nominee. Go back throughout history for as long as these people have existed. Every time it is the same. They will have criticisms about a candidate and then, if they're nominated, those criticisms will vanish. If you back them into a corner and confront them with proof of those past criticisms they'll say things like "Well I said my piece, now it's time for unity to stop the red."
That's Bush Sr., not W. Look, we must use Occam's Razor and explain it like it is: Liberalism was in full swing during W's tenure, most young people grew to dislike the religious right due to their fumbles during the 90s and 80s, and most of acamedia and MSM was already leaning very liberal. W had his problems and lackings, like all persons, but those were lackings which were magnified by an unfavorable enviroment and his inability to successfully fight back aganist such enviroment
I would personally argue that W was smarter and savvier than HW. HW got elected on the basis of Reagan's incredible popularity, giving incredible promises. HW then immediately and directly went back on his promises and got kicked out of office the next election. W, by contrast, controlled his voter base so well that even though he was already becoming hated by the time of his re-election bid he still made it two terms.

Also, as some political historians have pointed out: W was elected to be an economic president and became a war president. This means his qualifications didn't align with his ultimate duties. Despite that, they re-elected him to keep doing the thing he wasn't qualified for.

I don't support W at all, but the impression that he was some stupid hick who couldn't string two sentences together is just the effect of the MSM on a Republican president. MSM also tried the 'Trump is stupid' angle, they just didn't get much success with it so they pivoted to fascist.
 
Not sure if I am on the same wavelength as most of the Kiwis on here but I wasn't expecting the 2024 election to be serious and more and more my expectations have been met on that regard.

Politics in the West have become Oligarchs creating "serious guys" vs "over the top populists" in clown shows for the masses to vote for. Whether the stage managed harlequin who promises change is your guy/girl, or the respectable suit the media swoons for that your boomer mom thinks will save the country from, other respectable suits, nothing is going to change.

We should all just purchase our tickets and enjoy the circus. It's certainly not something worth losing a uterus
over

Wyświetl załącznik 6218294
Wait wouldn't all these women getting hysterectomies basically ensure that liberals have no children? Like isn't this basically the spiteful mutants taking themselves out for the betterment of society.
 
That's where I am on this. Anybody who hasn't changed their mind now isn't going to moving forward. Vote blue no matter who is ingrained into these peoples soul now. The fact that there will still "likely" be 60-70 million votes for Kamala just because she has a D next to her name is troubling enough for anybody who actually gives a shit about the state of the country. What is really being fought over is the 10-20 million people whose votes can be swayed or bought in the next 4 months.
Most people in this thread seem to disregard this, but it's true. Nothing scares these prospecitng voters more shitless than seeing Trump in the Oval Office again. They can't articulate why they're terrified, but they don't need to, and some probably aren't cognitively capable of doing so anyway (but remember, their vote counts just as much as yours).

I'm calling another fortification fiasco come November, but the Dems pull it out of a fear of apathy for their nominee among voters rather than a desire to cheat their way into restoring the status quo of the Obama years.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 6218279
Patrick oinks that Biden will never drop out because only Nazis say he will.

Then he drops out and Patrick instantly supports Harris.

This man has no opinions of his own.
"Its takes a cop to beat a crook" is pretty good, except that the left hates cops, especially the brown left who make up the bulk of the criminals. Great slogan though, too bad its not useful in this era.
Not sure if I am on the same wavelength as most of the Kiwis on here but I wasn't expecting the 2024 election to be serious and more and more my expectations have been met on that regard.
I was betting more on leftist violence and gayops instead of outright idiocy and incompetence. This is definitely preferable to that so far. I'm still banking on post-election violence from the left. There will be tantrums.

The empire has no clothes and has a [barely] visible micropenis. The pretense of democracy is dead.

gerrit lansin biden dropout 2024.jpg

Joe Biden drops out and Kamala Harris says she's in​

Biden’s post to X blindsided much of the rest of the staff at both the White House and the campaign, who had gotten no indication he was reconsidering his run. Since then, Zients has managed much of the communication across an anxious administration, holding calls Sunday afternoon with both the Cabinet and senior White House staffers. Zients is scheduled to hold an all-staff White House call on Monday morning, as well as a call with appointees across the executive branch.
Might we get a Weekend At Bernie's scenario? Has Biden's health taken a major turn worselike?
 
I would personally argue that W was smarter and savvier than HW. HW got elected on the basis of Reagan's incredible popularity, giving incredible promises. HW then immediately and directly went back on his promises and got kicked out of office the next election. W, by contrast, controlled his voter base so well that even though he was already becoming hated by the time of his re-election bid he still made it two terms.
That's very true, HW was far more uncharismatic than W, but what HW did in regards to the middle east was far more sensible. He knew when to keep pushing and when to stop, and at least where it comes to foreign police, that's the most important thing to master. HW also had to face Clinton, which is, well, Clinton. There's a good reason why Hillary ended up being the 2016 nominee, and why the Clinton's are still politically relevant to this day, and neither of those things are due to that woman's charisma.

Also, as some political historians have pointed out: W was elected to be an economic president and became a war president. This means his qualifications didn't align with his ultimate duties. Despite that, they re-elected him to keep doing the thing he wasn't qualified for.

I don't support W at all, but the impression that he was some stupid hick who couldn't string two sentences together is just the effect of the MSM on a Republican president. MSM also tried the 'Trump is stupid' angle, they just didn't get much success with it so they pivoted to fascist.
Yeah, but that's proof that W was very rigid in that regard. He had a background in business, so his economic inclinations were obvious, but a presidency isn't a job where we can just do what we are meant to do, but rather what we are required to do, and it must be acknowledged that most presidents don't live up to that. Yeah, the MSM was brutal aganist W, and the internet was twice as brutal aganist republican boomercons, there's a reason as to why most oldfags here a far more liberal than the average farmer.

Wait wouldn't all these women getting hysterectomies basically ensure that liberals have no children? Like isn't this basically the spiteful mutants taking themselves out for the betterment of society.
Just like with fags, these hags will now have grooming your kids into liberalism as their full time hobby, a sacrifice that they are more than willing to make
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole