Culture Have More Sex Please

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Ishtar
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia


By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
The problem is the false equivalence implied by the deflection. Nobody ever claims that the men who sire bastard children with barflies are just unable to control themselves, hapless, innocent, lost boys who are preyed upon by malicious sluts, and should be protected by society and the state from the consequences of their actions. Not even the surliest misogynists argue this.

The only groups whose innocent nature is regularly cited as the reason why all social and state forces should be marshaled to protect them from the consequences of their own stupid decisions are women, faggots, niggers, and illegal aliens.
Respectfully disagree. My original point is that absentee fathers are the party that is most responsible for the single mother epidemic, which demonstrates the overall loneliness issue is a two-way street. This is because absentee fathers lead a bachelor lifestyle and single mothers, who could dump their children off on the state at any moment it pleases them, choose to act more responsibly than absentee fathers. I am sure there are exceptions to the rule but this is a broadly statistical phonomime.

You can see the responses for yourself, but I am not straw manning the thread here.
I'm surprised you didn't lie wholesale, instead coming up with this carefully worded interjection to conceal that I've said that I deliberately chose to not have sex in the intimate relationships that I've been in.
Okay, then you're a vocel then, correct? The point I'm trying to make is you might be harboring the slightest smidgen of hatred for women as a gender. This emotion may ever-so-slightly be impacting your ability to see the situation objectively. There are many positives about women and their presence in the household is vital for the wellbeing of children.
 
It’s as easy as just saying “I don’t care, retard” or even outright ignoring said retard when confronted with obvious bait from the same 4-5 people who troll A&N regulars daily with the EXACT same material everytime… but I guess reruns don’t seem so bad when they’re all you got.
My man, I know you seem like you're trying to help. But complaining about this is more autistic than participating and debatably worse than instigating. If you've got nothing to say, why say it at all? The entire point of these threads are to debate, talk, or bitch about the happenings of the world. Le ebbin trolls are just as stupidly wasting their time as we are responding to them, except they debase themselves into retardation. Sometimes, people really are just fucking retarded too.
 
Personally, I've had perfectly fine experiences with women.

But I'm capable of learning lessons from the misfortune of others. I don't have to lose an arm in a car accident to know it's prudent to wear a seat belt.
Why let other people's fear rule your life? Thats fucking stupid. If you are an example, our society is fucked.
Welcome to the Great Replacement, folks. These fags wont even attempt to find a good women (you just have shit taste apparently, or just far more conceited than a good woman can tolerate), because they are scared! Do you check under your bed at night to make sure there arent any women that might steal your penis in the middle of the night.
 
My man, I know you seem like you're trying to help. But complaining about this is more autistic than participating and debatably worse than instigating. If you've got nothing to say, why say it at all? The entire point of these threads are to debate, talk, or bitch about the happenings of the world. Le ebbin trolls are just as stupidly wasting their time as we are responding to them, except they debase themselves into retardation. Sometimes, people really are just fucking retarded too.
Nah that’s cope. This is “definition of insanity” levels of repetitive. Arguing in circles with people who will never ever change their stance is only slightly less futile than taking bait and expecting it to not make you look retarded. I don’t really mind if pointing it out helps or not, I just find it strange that it happens every time
 
This is because absentee fathers lead a bachelor lifestyle and single mothers, who could dump their children off on the state at any moment it pleases them, choose to act more responsibly than absentee fathers. I am sure there are exceptions to the rule but this is a broadly statistical phonomime.

I think you are giving Women too much of the benefit of the doubt. People are people, and are being influenced all the time by the establishment. Women having children means they have a safety net from the government if things go south. Absentee fathers I think are leaving because they have no social pressure to stick around, in fact if you watch Black media they are being influenced in the opposite direction. "Bitches and Hoes Bitches and Hoes."
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Nah that’s cope. This is “definition of insanity” levels of repetitive. Arguing in circles with people who will never ever change their stance is only slightly less futile than taking bait and expecting it to not make you look retarded. I don’t really mind if pointing it out helps or not, I just find it strange that it happens every time
Then why are you here?
 
Okay, then you're a vocel then, correct?
...dude, I just don't want to have sex until I'm married.

The point I'm trying to make is you might be harboring the slightest smidgen of hatred for women as a gender.
Right now, you're not trying to make any point-- you've been trying to categorize me so you can address that category with prefab'd statements, because that's easier than having a regular argument with another individual. That's why you twice veered off into talking about incels instead of what you were quoting from me.

It's smarmy.
 
Why let other people's fear rule your life? Thats fucking stupid. If you are an example, our society is fucked.
Welcome to the Great Replacement, folks. These fags wont even attempt to find a good women (you just have shit taste apparently, or just far more conceited than a good woman can tolerate), because they are scared! Do you check under your bed at night to make sure there arent any women that might steal your penis in the middle of the night.
I'd just like to take a moment to appreciate how well these two posts complement eachother.

By our powers combined, the right-wing neo-nazis and the danger-hair radical feminists will defeat the incel menace that plagues this site.
 
I'd just like to take a moment to appreciate how well these two posts complement eachother.

By our powers combined, the right-wing neo-nazis and the danger-hair radical feminists will defeat the incel menace that plagues this site.
The White birthrate can be literally solved by legalizing rape and polygyny. Like right now.

Do you really want to go there?
 
the only women I've known who use "lol virgin" as an argument have been pretty fat
Feminist type women are always grouchy, ugly and fat or they've disfigured themselves with tattoos and shaved heads. They say the best way to turn someone against feminism is to have them meet a feminist.
I think you are giving Women too much of the benefit of the doubt. People are people, and are being influenced all the time by the establishment. Women having children means they have a safety net from the government if things go south. Absentee fathers I think are leaving because they have no social pressure to stick around, in fact in fact if you watch Black media they are being influenced in the opposite direction. "Bitches and Hoes Bitches and Hoes."
Men have this crazy idea that the woman should be a woman in the relationship. And when she's acting masculine and performing the father's role instead of the mother's one it becomes a problem. Every party needs a leader and trying to have 2 does not work. But everything we're told about modern relationships is about being equals and sharing everything. How women should be working like the men and men should be cleaning and cooking like the women. There's no defined roles so everything becomes unstable and collapses.
 
What does this incel-tier rambling even have to do with the fucking article? How did this fall on the shoulders of it being the fault of women when this article is geared toward both men and women???

Get out and touch grass, retards.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole