Culture Have More Sex Please

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Ishtar
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia


By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
Slight but important correction, women don’t do these things consciously. They aren’t waking up and thinking “I should make sure a strong man reproduces through me”-it’s innate subconscious behavior. Instinct that has to be rationalized post box.
Sure, it's a subconscious desire but they require you to act on them. Being hungry doesn't make me eat food. I eat food because I decide to move my fat ass and get something to eat.
A women can spread her legs all she wants but she cannot summon a dick without the assistance of a willing man.
Am I really the delusional one for blaming both for committing adultery?
Women are the gate keepers of sex. Women basically can summon a dick any time they want today and that's a problem. Men and women are both responsible for their actions but the guy who doesn't lock the door should be held responsible when the theft opens the door and steals a bunch of shit. No one is saying women are 100% responsible for the problem. In fact I'll side with you. Men SHOULD behave better, they should tard wrangle women into behaving properly instead of letting them run riot. Men are the blame and only we can fix it.

You hear me men? Go tard wrangle your local tinder whores and turn them into Stepford wives!
 
If women don't have enough agency to responsibly choose mates, then we should just all agree that cultures where the woman's father is her custodian until handing her off to a husband he approves of have the generaly right idea. Feminists regularly portray women as too stupid and childish to make good decisions about what to do with their bodies or think about consequences, and who am I to disagree?

It can't be both. Women can't be retarded children with no control over their actions when they get impregnated by that irresistible rake that picked them up at the club, yet simultaneously men's equals who absolutely should be running military strategy and handling billion-dollar contracts.
 
The government is women’s husband and corporations her mother. The Jew is her father and instructor.
 
I don't give a shit. Talk to me if you're going to quote the things I say for response, not the chorus of incels that totally exists.
Okay then, are you involuntarily celibate?
Every response you've given towards women having accountability is but the men though.
We know. All of us know. When you say that, we call it deflection because it doesn't justify anything.
Okay, I'll single women out specifically if that'll make you happy: women shouldn't be whores. We don't disagree on that point. However, as I pointed out, and will continue to point out, the men that participate in the adultery share in equal measure of responsibility.
 
Then please, tell all about how Nasty Women hurt your dick. I am very interested in hearing of your experiences.
Personally, I've had perfectly fine experiences with women.

But I'm capable of learning lessons from the misfortune of others. I don't have to lose an arm in a car accident to know it's prudent to wear a seat belt.
 
In retrospect I have to give this article a lot more credit, if only because it sparked so much discussion despite being so vapid. Very predictable that its devolved into nothing but the usual suspects getting baited by the other usual suspects, though
 
In retrospect I have to give this article a lot more credit, if only because it sparked so much discussion despite being so vapid. Very predictable that its devolved into nothing but the usual suspects getting baited by the other usual suspects, though
pretending to be retarded is the same as being retarded
but that is every slightly controversial thread, yes
 
men that participate in the adultery share in equal measure of responsibility.
The problem is the false equivalence implied by the deflection. Nobody ever claims that the men who sire bastard children with barflies are just unable to control themselves, hapless, innocent, lost boys who are preyed upon by malicious sluts, and should be protected by society and the state from the consequences of their actions. Not even the surliest misogynists argue this.

The only groups whose innocent nature is regularly cited as the reason why all social and state forces should be marshaled to protect them from the consequences of their own stupid decisions are women, faggots, niggers, and illegal aliens.

EDIT: I forgot about addicts and bums
 
Actual loneliness and despair are very real problems. The issue of course is no one feels sympathetic for lonely or depressed men(even in leftist or liberal circles-in fact they are even more hostile). Actual solutions to these problems are never going to be proposed because a lot of people would suffer very badly to solve them.
 
you're either lying or a eunuch
There's no point in you getting hung up on my not having had sex if you're only going to assume what's most convenient for you.

There's no point in it at all, to begin with, but there's especially no point if you're not asking questions to get information.
 
There's no point in you getting hung up on my not having had sex if you're only going to assume what's most convenient for you.
Dude she is an abortion championing radfem. She’s not got an honest bone in her body. Everything about her is dishonesty and resentful misandry.
 
Protip: Citing research and then making up your own conclusions, or even worse, using the conclusions of journalists is retarded.

A 51% chance for bungus will mean that there's a 51% chance for bungus.
Not that people like bungus cuz wungus therefore women good.
ESPECIALLY if the study is a fucking survey and it's only been done once.
Dude she is an abortion championing radfem. She’s not got an honest bone in her body. Everything about her is dishonesty and resentful misandry.
You'd think the femcel in kiwifarms wouldn't worry about having sex.
'Pparently not. In fact it's like three thots.
Why do these threads devolve into the 3 Blue haired bitches on Kiwi farms arguing with some Larping Faggot who I have never seen post before this thread was created?
I assume it's because the goochie gang are literally too retarded to get simps irl.
It's sad, like watching a decrepit lion scrounge for refuse cuz they're too dried up to be useful to anyone.
 
Because they are human and make mistakes also relationships are messy so is pregnancies and hormones. Go read some relationship advice how many men and women were in terrible relationships or where cheating is happening and it didn't click to them until they found out. Also people can't act like paranoid cunts all the time. But i am sure this is also somehow womans fault . And the fact that sex and relationships together with births are in decline shouldn't be already indicator that woman are careful .
So you're just going to deny women any agency in this? Say "oh it's messy, you see hormones and feelings and women are just human" while claiming that it's the big bad evil men's fault?

Do you not get how absolutely ludicrous that sounds? Using your own argument why do women have rights if 'hormones' can lead them to accidentally create a baby with a scumbag?
 
pretending to be retarded is the same as being retarded
It’s as easy as just saying “I don’t care, retard” or even outright ignoring said retard when confronted with obvious bait from the same 4-5 people who troll A&N regulars daily with the EXACT same material everytime… but I guess reruns don’t seem so bad when they’re all you got.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole