ScouseGobshite
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 28 Gru 2020
Yes, this. And pretty much every man goes through a point in his life when he's a (relatively) small, smooth-skinned, cute-faced 'male' with no secondary sexual characteristics to speak of - ie, childhood and very early puberty. But no girls outside of the Barnum slideshow stall go through a period of looking big, bulky, hairy and rectangular at the same time, certainly not before or during their fertile lifespan, when they're at the prime point of being 'attractive female' to other humans.You can add mass, but you can't really subtract it without major surgery, and even then, your results may vary.
Wired has (or had, I haven't checked) a video with a woman from the CIA talking about how to disguise a spy, and she literally said you can make a woman look like a man, but can't make a man look like a woman pretty much entirely because men are just that much bigger.
Women retain more attributes common to pre-puberty than men, so it's fundamentally always easier to make a woman look like an adolescent boy or a smaller, slighter man, than it is to take a post-puberty man and morph him backwards into an adolescent girl or average woman. No coincidence that the MTF troons who go all the way as early as possible, before puberty does what it's supposed to, are better passing than their middle-aged equivalents, no matter how much money and effort they can throw at the problem.
Of course, the poor sod of a five-year-old boy whose Munchausens parents decide to girl him up into infinity, before he even knows what 'male' or 'female' (or 'sterilisation') actually means, may make a well-passing dickless ladyboy, but whether that was what he ever actually would have wanted as an informed adult, who can say?