What's the deal with "conventionally attractive"?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

cybertoaster

Chairman of the mammary regulation committee
kiwifarms.net
Dołączono
3 Gru 2020
1740902384976.png

Lately I hear this being thrown around a lot and like other new terms it seems to have lost all meaning from overuse because just 2 days ago I heard some girls referring to a pretty redhead chick as "not conventionally attractive". She wasn't tatted up, she wasn't a walking MRI claymore she didn't have even one piercing, and her clothes were also normal, maybe a bit hipster-ish but she was very conventionally attractive in that you have to be a very gay guy (not that there's anything wrong with that, heh) to find her unattractive.

And many such cases, when I ask women what's conventionally attractive they point to a girl who is only half a pound from being a supermodel/famine victim and has more paint layers in her face than a car, hardly conventional, not even close to the average of what men find attractive.

I even asked the all mighty computer programmed by that gay guy who touched his sister, this is what it said:

For women, conventional attractiveness often includes features such as:
Symmetry and Proportion: Faces and bodies that align with traditional notions of balance and harmony.
Clear Skin: Smooth, blemish-free skin is often associated with health and vitality.
Pleasant Smile: A bright, well-aligned smile is seen as a marker of friendliness and approachability.
Body Shape: A figure that conforms to societal norms, such as a slender waist and curvy hips, is often idealized.

So is that it? because that redhead would fit on all those categories, unless you're bri'ish and think all redheads should be drowned I guess...
 
To be honest, this just reads as that typical passive aggressive lying thing women do to each other.

Also could be some social media brain rot and they're taking cues on what types of profiles get the most attention on whatever apps they use...but that doesn't operate off the same rules as IRL. Socmed really is cancer.
 
1740902384976.png

Lately I hear this being thrown around a lot and like other new terms it seems to have lost all meaning from overuse because just 2 days ago I heard some girls referring to a pretty redhead chick as "not conventionally attractive". She wasn't tatted up, she wasn't a walking MRI claymore she didn't have even one piercing, and her clothes were also normal, maybe a bit hipster-ish but she was very conventionally attractive in that you have to be a very gay guy (not that there's anything wrong with that, heh) to find her unattractive.

And many such cases, when I ask women what's conventionally attractive they point to a girl who is only half a pound from being a supermodel/famine victim and has more paint layers in her face than a car, hardly conventional, not even close to the average of what men find attractive.

I even asked the all mighty computer programmed by that gay guy who touched his sister, this is what it said:

For women, conventional attractiveness often includes features such as:Symmetry and Proportion: Faces and bodies that align with traditional notions of balance and harmony.Clear Skin: Smooth, blemish-free skin is often associated with health and vitality.Pleasant Smile: A bright, well-aligned smile is seen as a marker of friendliness and approachability.Body Shape: A figure that conforms to societal norms, such as a slender waist and curvy hips, is often idealized.
So is that it? because that redhead would fit on all those categories, unless you're bri'ish and think all redheads should be drowned I guess...
I know you meant this question for women but Ill take a crack at it if its okay
"Conventionally attractive" is a term used to indicate how good a partner is supposed to be on a subconscious level. It involves many implicit and explicit traits, natural and artificial. Those traits help determine how genetically compatible two people are which in laymans terms manifests as attractiveness. It even involves something nonsensical as smell, there is a overlap between genetic similarity and body odour, if you find somebody's natural body odour (natural scent) to be bad chances are the both of you are more genetically similar and vice versa. There was a study in Britain conducted for the same back in the 2000s.
(
)
The human body is very intelligent that way.

When it comes to the traits women find attractive about men, most of it has a scientific basis just like most of the traits men find attractive about women. We are animals at the end of the day and natural selection is a very important thing. Attraction and mating in every species is a constant process of trait selection, said trait selection is something humans term as "attraction".

1. Symmetry and proportion is a result of the Golden Ratio or Phi (6.614), its a ratio according to which most of human body proportions exist in nature, say proportion of arm to joints, finger joints and fingers, head and neck etc. The closer to the ratio the body proportions are, there generally is more symmetry. Its deemed to be attractive cause its closer to natural perfection and the body tries to select partners such that their symmetrical proportions can be passed down to children, making the children more attractive and therefore more capable of lineage propagation.

2. Clear skin is just an extension of hygiene. Hygiene in general is more preferred cause it signifies that said partner is less capable of being diseased and less capable of transmitting diseases to offspring.

3. Pleasant smile is probably one of the only non biological traits. Its probably attractive cause it means said person is happy and outgoing, probably has something to do with psychology which I dont know much about.

4. Body shape and physical features is also dictated by the Golden Ratio to a large degree. But it also comes down to some non golden ratio things. Women like strong men cause they subconsciously perceive the strength as a trait which would be passed down to children, increasing the childrens survival capability. Men like thin women cause it probably has something to do with ease of childbearing, a good trait to be passed down to children. Also the chest to waist width is also a golden ratio, supposed to be anyways.

Apologies for being hyper autistic about this, almost all of subconscious attraction comes down to trait selection and lineage enhancement. Conscious attraction is more personality based and probably varies from person to person.

Sidenote: Women hate baldness for pretty much the same reason, it posits the possibility of having children who bald early, decreasing their survival chances against things like sunlight and weather which human hair is supposed to protect against. Also probably why black people bald less on average than white people do cause their hair actually protects them from harsh weather.
 
"not conventionally attractive"
As I've always understood the concept, it's used to poke fun at writers who cast or create obviously attractive characters, but give them a minor "flaw" that steps out of the the typical girly girliness to pretend they're average/uncool/ugly. Because they are super feminist, not like those other superficial men, and break pesky beauty standards, yo.

It could be things like a pretty female best friend being goth, ginger, or wearing glasses and braces. Yeah, there are absolutely no millions upon millions of men (including the writer who created the character) who would find that extremely hot and base their entire lives around those fetishes.

To be honest, I think people who use "not conventionally attractive" as a criticism are kind of stupid. Yeah, if you're going to watch someone for a couple of hours, you'd prefer them to be pleasing to the eye. It's just a fictional story, stop being such joyless bitches.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
All these other posts are wrong. "Conventionally attractive" means if you saw the person at a furry convention you would fuck them in a drug fueled fursuit orgy.
 
There was a study in Britain conducted for the same back in the 2000s.
( )
The human body is very intelligent that way.
I saw this back in the day. Same applies to women, better looking, healthier men smell better to them.

Might have been part of the same program but this extended to babies as well. Babies who where nursing had a bunch of bras of women placed around them. Babies would turn/go to the bras of their mothers.
 
Normalization - romantization of degeneracy.
Like when women call out other women for being virgins and prudes.
It hurts them down to their core that they humiliated themselves with tats and achieved nothing of importance, while superior specimen just walks by like they don't exist.
 
Asks women all posts are made by men shitting on women. Don't you have whole board for that called autistic thunderdome?

Also lol.

Hello woman hivemind care to explain the weird comments of one woman?
Literally this post.
 
i'm glad all of the WHT regulars decided to pitch their two-cents in all at the same time. really makes you wonder why this post is in the beauty parlor at all.
 
Asks women all posts are made by men shitting on women. Don't you have whole board for that called autistic thunderdome?

Also lol.

Hello woman hivemind care to explain the weird comments of one woman?
Literally this post.
They're not asking women; posting on this board does not entail that, despite its name. They're asking Kiwifarmers regardless of their gender, however they said that they have previously asked women.

Also, most of the posts in here are not shitting on them.

And the irony of a regular in one of those hate-threads for posting this. :story:
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole