- Dołączono
- 9 Sie 2022
Because preparedness means diversifying your skillset which means being a generalist/jack of all trades and that's not what modern civilization values. Modern civilization is built around specialization, i.e. dedicating yourself wholly to a single area of focus and outsourcing everything else to other people for whom that is their area of focus. This is a gamble, because it means that a lot of individuals are dependent upon civilization to sustain themselves, but it also means that because they can dedicate themselves entirely to a single pursuit, they can push that field further, which sometimes benefits society, such as with scientific and technological advancements.
The cool thing is this is stratified; obviously not everyone is a specialist, generalists still exist and aren't subject to the same interdependence and instability that specialists are. In fact a lot of politics is downstream from this: specialists aren't able to sustain themselves independently, they have to be part of a collective, so they clump together densely, and support legislation and policy that meets their needs as vulnerable single-minded interdependent collectivists, which is why cities are liberal. Meanwhile, generalists are less dependent upon a larger collective and broadly capable of meeting their own needs most of the time, so they don't have to clump together or enact policy that forces others to take care of them or keep them safe. Urban liberal collectivism is the high-risk high-reward strategy that -- occasionally -- facilitates the advancement of the species, and rural conservative individualism is the bedrock that grants the stability upon which that gamble is built, and which will act as a bulwark against extinction in the event of inevitable catastrophes that specialists cannot weather. Neither is inherently wrong, except when they believe that the other is, and that the other should be like them or cease to exist.
If everybody was a boy scout there wouldn't be any nerds building rocket ships and computers that fit in my pocket and show me how to fix my car or where I am in the mountains based on the relative latency of clocks on satellites in space. I am happy to not be one of them, but I'm not bothered by their existence as long as it continues to benefit me and they stay in their hive and leave me alone.
The cool thing is this is stratified; obviously not everyone is a specialist, generalists still exist and aren't subject to the same interdependence and instability that specialists are. In fact a lot of politics is downstream from this: specialists aren't able to sustain themselves independently, they have to be part of a collective, so they clump together densely, and support legislation and policy that meets their needs as vulnerable single-minded interdependent collectivists, which is why cities are liberal. Meanwhile, generalists are less dependent upon a larger collective and broadly capable of meeting their own needs most of the time, so they don't have to clump together or enact policy that forces others to take care of them or keep them safe. Urban liberal collectivism is the high-risk high-reward strategy that -- occasionally -- facilitates the advancement of the species, and rural conservative individualism is the bedrock that grants the stability upon which that gamble is built, and which will act as a bulwark against extinction in the event of inevitable catastrophes that specialists cannot weather. Neither is inherently wrong, except when they believe that the other is, and that the other should be like them or cease to exist.
If everybody was a boy scout there wouldn't be any nerds building rocket ships and computers that fit in my pocket and show me how to fix my car or where I am in the mountains based on the relative latency of clocks on satellites in space. I am happy to not be one of them, but I'm not bothered by their existence as long as it continues to benefit me and they stay in their hive and leave me alone.