Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
You people and your displays with more than 256 colors. Luxury.
Wyświetl załącznik 9201756
Not exclusively.I might be wrong, but isn’t any app with the org.freedesktop.*.* nomenclature a flatpak?
open_temporary_icon_file() works upstream it utilizes g_get_tmp_dir(), which the glib docs mentions uses TMPDIR and falls back to /tmp if it isnt set. So unless AccountsService sets its own TMPDIR (it doesnt), then this naturally lands in your shared /tmp which doesn't work anymore for reasons stated previously.g_get_tmp_dir() with get_icondir() This is an internal helper thats already defined in accountsservice's util.c that retrieves the static icon directory variable. This base path is /var/lib/AccountsService/icons, which is a fixed directory exposed to accountsservices. So basically a patch can have it stage icons right there instead./tmpRan Openbox on Debian for a while with tint2 taskbar, jgmenu startmenu and PCmanFM for desktop icons. It was the most stable system I have ever used. Shoutouts to IceWM too:Yall niggas need to put more respect on Openbox's name. I reject your tiling modernity in favour of stacking tradition.
Use one only on my work computer. ultrawide, I simply want three quadrants.Why do people like tiling window managers? I don't really get it. I usually don't want to see applications that I'm not using, so why have them take up screen real estate? There are relatively few scenarios where I'd want a screen split between several applications.
>Threethree quadrants.
It's really nice on ultrawide monitors, it can be a bit of an annoyance whenever you want to see a picture or something and you quickly open it only for it to screw up your entire workspace. I don't prefer one over the other, they're just different.Why do people like tiling window managers? I don't really get it. I usually don't want to see applications that I'm not using, so why have them take up screen real estate? There are relatively few scenarios where I'd want a screen split between several applications.
Ye you can just install them either through config.scm or home.scm and instead of installing an entirely new package it will just use the one already on your system thanks to GNOME, so when you eventually uninstall the GNOME suite your font doesn't get garbage collected. I don't use EXWM myself but the guides and streams from SystemCrafters are super legit.@Ferryman so i see in the exwm tutorial they want me to use their systemcrafters config
im kind of skipping around i got through some of the emacs from scratch and im moving onto exwm
it says to install fonts-cantarell and fira-code
i see fira-code in the guix repo and gnome presumably comes with cantarell but i want to have that in my config.scm separate from gnome so when i eventually uninstall it ill still have the font
i see the a cantarell font here but im not sure if its the same font
speaking of i found their config is a bit outdated. package dired-single was removed from melpa so you have to git clone it into emacs.d/lisp and add this to your init.elYe you can just install them either through config.scm or home.scm and instead of installing an entirely new package it will just use the one already on your system thanks to GNOME, so when you eventually uninstall the GNOME suite your font doesn't get garbage collected. I don't use EXWM myself but the guides and streams from SystemCrafters are super legit.
Yes, but just think about all the advantages from running a rolling-release distro that you would have missed out on by using software that has undergone a minimum of quality control. Why, Dolphin 26.04 fixed '514209 preventted flickrering when holding F5 key, by Ritchie Frodomar,' Don't we all just hold down the F5 key constantly? It's so frustrating when you hold the key to refresh things and the screen refreshes. Very important to avoid that. Why, it only made it into Debian testing a couple weeks after release, imagine waiting that long to be able to hold down the F5 key like a deranged spastic and not have your screen update each time the file manager reloaded files in a directory.Whoever it is that pushed a regressed fontmanager for Arch should go take a long leap off a bridge, KDE's now throwing fits and refusing to launch random programs over font setting strings having too many 0s meaning all my system fonts are currently stuck at semibold and I had to run font caching commands I last had to deal with three or four years ago or otherwise Dolphin for some stupid reason would straight up crash while also having a fit with ffmpeg thumbnails.
It's amusing how KDE became the devil, when i got into Linux 6 years ago it was universally loved and recommended.
Let's you not use the mouse. Also you're supposed to use multiple virtual desktops, rather than minimizing. Basically GNOME 40 for men.Why do people like tiling window managers? I don't really get it. I usually don't want to see applications that I'm not using, so why have them take up screen real estate? There are relatively few scenarios where I'd want a screen split between several applications.
It's way more than that. It was good then bad over and over.It's amusing how KDE became the devil, when i got into Linux 6 years ago it was universally loved and recommended.
"if you see me running ubuntu i might say hi"
I remember KDE being thrown hate at in the 90s already, and it was for the same reason as today: that it's too similar to Windows.It's amusing how KDE became the devil, when i got into Linux 6 years ago it was universally loved and recommended.
I've used KDE since KDE 3 (KDE 2 if you count the SuSE 7.3 disk I took from work that was already way outdated when I installed it). They have a habit of getting their DE perfect by the x.3 release and everything goes well for a few years, then releasing a major x.0 release that feels like a beta. They track Qt so they don't have a choice when going from 5.27 to 6.0, but I really think a lot of the issues are on them. The move from 3 to 4 was brutal, 4.0 felt like an alpha release, more recent ones have been better. It's also been one of the more resource-heavy DEs. This was of vital importance back in 2005 and may be important again as RAM gets expensive, and I don't think there's an excuse to not be conscious of that kind of thing even when everything is cheap.It's amusing how KDE became the devil, when i got into Linux 6 years ago it was universally loved and recommended.
I don't think it's all on them, though. Some of it is also due to Qt. A good example of this is how you literally have to patch the entirety of Qt6 itself to get Qt6 based applications to display animations at higher refresh rates than 60. No, I am not joking. If you ever noticed Dolphin or System Settings scrolling choppily on your high refresh rate monitors, this is literally why:They track Qt so they don't have a choice when going from 5.27 to 6.0, but I really think a lot of the issues are on them.
(src)Qt is old. It was created when no one could ever imagine surpassing that framerate, hence the animations are implemented in a way that is tied to a single unified timer that ticks every 16 ms, which is nothing but slightly above 60 times a second. This timer is called the default timer interval, which is nothing but how often the animation updates are triggered globally.
And guess what? That timer is hardcoded at compilation time. There's no way to change it at runtime. Not even Kwin developers have figured out how to change it without doing hacky stuff like these patched versions of kwin and qt6-base do.
According to the very same KWin developers in said thread, including me, there's a theoretical architectural redesign needed for animations to actually work perfectly synchronized by getting rid of the default timer interval - or at least make it not hardcoded - but that's out of our hands and only Qt can make these changes themselves because the animations API code is private and a change like this is definitely not trivial to do.