The Harris in the White House Alternate History Speculation Thread

[Book Thief]

Maaybe gun control, and she even went back on that.

Giving you a simply because if you look back at her history in California, it becomes clear that her attempts at trying to court the 2A crowd were transparent lies, as both her and Walz were all in on the "2A's about hunting" and "AR-15s are weapons of war and don't belong on our streets" schtick we've heard a million times. They absolutely wanted to implement an "Assault Weapons Ban" like the one we had during the Clinton administration.

 

[Thiletonomics]

I imagine more assassinations of notable "wrongthinkers" would happen in that Harris timeline than in real life. A Charlie Kirk assassination likely still would've happened.

Those assassinations would also include collateral deaths and damage too, and the Harris administration will refuse to acknowledge and apologize for the innocent people that also get injured/killed and property that gets damaged/destroyed while taking down the select wrongthinker target.

 

[Gandhi's Left Hook]

But on the plus side, with no pushback against illegal immigration there'd be no endless anti-ICE freakshows in the "woke"-run cities.

How is this a plus? I think the Dems exposing themselves as anti-American in such a manner is great. Following random cars around and harassing people with the same make as ICE cars is going to do much more harm to them than they will gain out of having a few of their gremlins killed.

 

[FunPosting101]

Honestly? She'd have done some damage, caused some problems, but would've been an overall ineffective president that would get absolutely clobbered in the mid-terms and the next presidential election after that would have gone overwhelmingly to the GOP.

Some of the shit people in here are talking about is pretty out there, and just wouldn't have happened in any sort of realistic scenario where Harris won in 2024.

 

[Taser Confetti]

Putin invade a NATO country

You seem to forget that there's two other NATO countries with nuclear weapons. Including one that's rejected the Anglophone "no first use" policy.

I want to see how aggressively they'd go after Chinese media

China exports virtually no culture to the rest of the world besides kung fu movies. Even tankie Sinophiles aren't consuming Mandarin movies and TV shows.

 

[Gurney Halleck]

Wouldn't she just purge MAGA and the GOP outright so that the US is a one-party state so "thing's can actually get done", like how China's one-party state does?

I think the ideal Dem scenario is that the national GOP would just turn into what it is in California or other solidly blue states, nominally still existing in a few remaining geographic areas but is shut out of power in every meaningful way.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

Another thing that would have gone differently in the Harris timeline?

There would have been no pushing to overthrow the regime over in Iran.

 

[Do Not Touch Me Pls]

There would have been no pushing to overthrow the regime over in Iran.

It would happen anyways and likely in a more braindead and much less cutthroat manner.

Remember the last series of Iran scares happened under Biden.

 

[Thiletonomics]

Speaking of assassinations, the Harris administration would have pulled off a hit on JK Rowling, even if it involves numerous collateral damage and deaths, i.e. a fully-loaded jet airliner mysteriously points nose down into JKR's mansion and crashes into it.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

This is irrelevant to the topic but I'm going to dump it here anyways, I got to wondering if the idea of Harris sucking dick wasn't hotter in context, so I looked up Young Harris, and she somehow actually looks less appealing.


Ew.


Just looks like a washed up brown wine aunt. I can actually imagine having sex with this woman even though it'd be for want of better options and I'd hate myself for it.

 

[Male Idiot]

The US government would be headed by different pajeets. FBI director would be a jeeta, not a jeet. Poota Patel.

 

[Hallucinogenic Penguin]

given how she would encourage open borders, how likely is it a 9/11 round 2 would happen under her watch?

 

[Thiletonomics]

given how she would encourage open borders, how likely is it a 9/11 round 2 would happen under her watch?

She would also blame Whitey for causing it.

Also, would Kamala have bursted the AI bubble so hard that it causes the entire World to fall into the next Great Depression, either intentionally or unintentionally? Her approval rating would somehow not tank though, because at least it's not ORANGE MAN.

 

[Gurney Halleck]

given how she would encourage open borders, how likely is it a 9/11 round 2 would happen under her watch?

I don't think we'd have another large event on the scale of 9/11, but we would probably have an Obama 2.0 slow burn of constant Islamist bombings and shootings that just get chalked up to part and parcel of living in a society.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

some new prediction to add to the ever-growing list:

* Venezuelans would still be with a socialist regime
* Iranians would still be under the terrorist regime
* Cuba would still be trying to pull Real Communism™

 

[Return of the Freaker]

But on the plus side, with no pushback against illegal immigration there'd be no endless anti-ICE freakshows in the "woke"-run cities.

They'd find some new George Floyd to have riots over. Probably Trans. Also, the Justice Department starts going after police departments that use bodycams because they're suddenly racist/phobic now

 

[Unredacted TND]

We would proably have more right-wing mainstream culture and youth would contunies to get more conservative.

Elon Musk would be in jail (or so he claims).

Media would have an insufferable field week about first black female president.

Midterms would be red tsunami.

We'd not go to Venezuela or Iran.

 

[Evan Kor]

I think the urban scams would've still come to light and she wouldn't have trashed her presidency trying to protect Minneapolis when is stole from the rest of the country. However, she would've been a wet blanket for any political reforms to stop urban areas from defrauding the federal government. She probably would've been better than Biden since Biden was doing 1 of 2 things:
1) Accelerationism by pushing every horrendous leftist policy as far as he could in order to cause a backlash. Even if you love trannies and illegal immigrants, Biden's behavior made those things unpalatable.
OR
2) He was such a coward that he let retards in his party run his presidency. And since moral hazard exists, those people had no problem pushing things far further than any reasonable person would accept.

She would've failed with Iran and Venezuela and would've let things get far worse. Trying to rely on the International community would, at best, just result in aimless interventions like in Libya where no one could take charge over the defeated nation. Iran would've gotten the bomb(assuming they hadn't already detonated one a year or two ago) and the worthless brits would've dragged us into a war with Iran since the British are still bitter about their slaves rebelling.

So yeah, she would've sucked. And she wouldn't have been able to be so brazenly extreme as Biden since even Democrats were getting very sick of their own side in the culture war. Trannies, depite being treated as the most precious Americans, were still shooting up schools and killing themselves when Biden was president.

Edit: I'm not defending the witch but just being realistic. She would've been a nightmare for appointing judges.

 

[Evan Kor]

We'd not go to Venezuela or Iran.

We'd for sure be dragged into Iran. Just look at how the "peace-loving" Europeans have been more pro-Iran-war than the American media once bombs started falling. Europeans all saw Iran as a failing state in need of a master and the Brits would've stopped at nothing to re-assert dominance over Iran. As for Venezuela, there would still be a conflict but it would've been a far shittier one since she would've been relying on Maduro invading Guyana in order to get the International Community to push us into Venezuela.

Both countries needed regime change or at least regime modification. It was too obvious to everyone that Venezuela was a problem due to its ties with China and its proximity to the Canal.

 

[Unredacted TND]

We'd for sure be dragged into Iran. Just look at how the "peace-loving" Europeans have been more pro-Iran-war than the American media once bombs started falling. Europeans all saw Iran as a failing state in need of a master and the Brits would've stopped at nothing to re-assert dominance over Iran. As for Venezuela, there would still be a conflict but it would've been a far shittier one since she would've been relying on Maduro invading Guyana in order to get the International Community to push us into Venezuela.

Both countries needed regime change or at least regime modification. It was too obvious to everyone that Venezuela was a problem due to its ties with China and its proximity to the Canal.

Sure, i'm not denying that. But Harris simply would postpone it.