- Dołączono
- 19 Wrz 2020
Maybe it doesn’t matter, but my spider-sense tells me it might be a good idea to do that purely as a courtesy to Null.Also it really ain't cool to accuse her parents of molesting her.
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
Maybe it doesn’t matter, but my spider-sense tells me it might be a good idea to do that purely as a courtesy to Null.Also it really ain't cool to accuse her parents of molesting her.
I feel "sympathy" in that I think most of the really hideous claims about her are exaggerated or mostly the result of her own bullshit tall tales being taken more seriously than they should be. That said she's clearly an asshole, at the very least. One of those people who seems to enjoy making other people feel awful and uncomfortable. Reading the discord logs it's obvious she's a tryhard edgelord who gets off on bringing out the worst in people. She has little empathy for others even at her best. I don't think she killed her dog, but she definitely harassed a trans student and then basically laughed when they committed suicide. That's just straight up fucked up.
Yes. I should make clear that speculating about molestation is not speculation about who did such a thing if it occurred (and if I suggested as much I retract it), although I will make clear they (or at least some of them) neglected, and continue to neglect, her, as evidenced at least by the emergency custody order glowly-dad got against fly-mom.Also it really ain't cool to accuse her parents of molesting her.
These poor fuckers are already dealing with enough.
Yes. I should make clear that speculating about molestation is not speculation about who did such a thing if it occurred (and if I suggested as much I retract it), although I will make clear they (or at least some of them) neglected, and continue to neglect, her, as evidenced at least by the emergency custody order glowly-dad got against fly-mom.
Sorry, but I don't really think this comparison holds water. People mostly feel bad for Bella due to the sheer volume of hate she is getting I think, Gunt perhaps excepted. WCT may or may not get his time to shine depending on whether or not something horrible comes out about him (although lacking a glowdad and big tits he is less memeable.) Then people can feel bad for him and then if there is still a disproportionate response, then you can chalk it up to sexism. If anything I think the degree of exposure Bella is getting is where any sexism would likely be found. Like I said, memeable.To OP and other tender-hearted virgin males: what about Sean Walker / WCT?
He's way, way less involved than Bella. Never boiled any hamsters. Never stole from Chris. The most he's guilty of is being a conceited histrionic teenager.
So why then? I mean why do you make threads defending this evil bitch, but not Sean Walker? What could the difference between these two individuals be? I'll give you the answer: one X chromosome and eight cup sizes.
The glowy stuff is just a meme, but the emergency custody order was detailed in this post.Glowy shit is about as reality based as Zoomer shit.
These are narratives.
It was speculated this was because Bella went to TTU.as evidenced at least by the emergency custody order glowly-dad got against fly-mom.
That makes no sense. She wouldn't be at TTU until over 18, so there is no custody at that point.It was speculated this was because Bella went to TTU.
Since he’s in New Mexico, and mom is in NYC, it makes sense for there to have been a custody transfer.
You are correct. I was going by the part in the custody order saying "Consent Emergency Motion for Order Allowing Minor Childs Immediate Enrollment in School".That makes no sense. She wouldn't be at TTU until over 18, so there is no custody at that point.
This isn't entirely true and I'm not sure what definitions you're using to base this off of.Sociopath by definition is mostly "nurture".
Psychopath definition is mostly "nature".
We don't know whether Isabella is a psychopath or sociopath, so we don't know if its nature or nurture.
As in most instances, it's usually a ratio of nature and nurture.
The question isn't if its nature or nurture, its what the ratio of nature to nurture it is.
I would suspect 75% nature, 25% nurture for now. But that's just a fun guess.
Both psychopathy and sociopathy have similar diagnoses associated with them, such as antisocial personality disorder, but are still considered different. Literature is still in debate on the exact definition of each one.This isn't entirely true and I'm not sure what definitions you're using to base this off of.
Personality disorders are hotly debated by psychs. They don't know if they're nature or nurture, or what % they would be of that because they aren't sure what causes them in the first place. The people who have them aren't really trustworthy in terms of their narratives, and there is seldom pure consistency in the backgrounds of people who have them. Example is like narcissists can be overly neglected or overly praised, but logic would dictate those two extremes should cause two different results in the child and it doesn't seem to. This is part of the confusion for doctors.
I will further point out that Psychopath and Sociopath are both aspects of Antisocial personality disorder and are no longer considered separate diagnosis and are both thought to be the same thing now.
"The common features of a psychopath and sociopath lie in their shared diagnosis: antisocial personality disorder." The DSM-5 doesn't say psychopath or sociopath, it says antisocial personality disorder. Those terms aren't in there.The DSM-5 is the updated version, and the link provided states what I mentioned.
Colloquially maybe, or perhaps in countries outside the USA - but as far as I recall, the DSM-V has no distinct listing for either and they are grouped under ASPD.Psychopathy and Sociopath have different definitions, but are both denoted as Antisocial personality disorder for simplicity. This doesn't mean they don't exist.
Want to add here that bad people are unreliable narrators for how they became such. A lot of really bad people, serial killers and shit, will claim all kinds of abuse but once investigated there is never any evidence of it.
Could it have happened on the DL? Sure. But when someone does that kind of thing is them being a liar really something you wouldn't expect?
Colloquially maybe, or perhaps in countries outside the USA - but as far as I recall, the DSM-V has no distinct listing for either and they are grouped under ASPD.
From now on, every person EVEN MENTIONING THE DSM shall be boiled alive like Allah has willed it in his sacred text, for heresy and not following the Quran when someone is having a rough patch emotionally. Inshallah.